Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Combined rTMS and tSCS for Upper Limb Recovery in Cervical SCI

8. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: National University Hospital, Singapore

Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

This clinical trial investigates whether combining cortical and spinal neuromodulation can improve upper limb motor recovery in adults with chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Restoring upper limb function is the top rehabilitation priority for individuals with tetraplegia, yet effective interventions remain limited.

The study combines transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), which enhances spinal circuit excitability, with intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation that increases cortical excitability and strengthens descending motor pathways. While each approach has shown independent promise, their combined use has not been evaluated in a controlled trial.

Eligible participants are adults aged 21-65 with chronic (>12 months post-injury) incomplete cervical SCI (ASIA Impairment Scale grade C or D, levels C2-C8). A total of 24 participants will be randomised 1:1 to either combined iTBS and tSCS plus standardised upper limb rehabilitation, or tSCS plus rehabilitation alone, across 24 sessions over 12 weeks.

The primary outcome is change in Upper Extremity Motor Score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes cover functional performance, independence, spasticity, corticospinal excitability, quality of life, and goal attainment. Assessments occur at baseline, post-intervention, and at 4- and 12-week follow-up.

As a pilot randomised controlled trial, this study will generate the first controlled evidence on adjunctive cortical neuromodulation alongside tSCS-based rehabilitation, while also producing feasibility data to inform the design of a future definitive multicentre trial.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Background: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) results in severe upper limb impairment, with restoration of hand and arm function ranked as the highest rehabilitation priority by individuals with tetraplegia. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing upper limb recovery. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), an efficient form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, can enhance cortical excitability and descending motor drive. However, the benefit of combining these complementary neuromodulation modalities to simultaneously target supraspinal and spinal circuits has not been evaluated in a controlled trial.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of combined cortical neuromodulation (iTBS) and spinal neuromodulation (tSCS) versus tSCS alone, each paired with standardized upper limb rehabilitation, for improving upper limb motor function in chronic incomplete cervical SCI.

Methods: This single-center, two-arm, assessor-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll 24 adults aged 21 to 65 years with chronic (more than 12 months post-injury) incomplete cervical SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C or D, neurological level C2 to C8). Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either iTBS combined with tSCS plus standardized upper limb rehabilitation or tSCS plus upper limb rehabilitation alone. Interventions will be delivered twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions). The primary outcome is the change in Upper Extremity Motor Score from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include measures of upper limb function, independence, spasticity, corticospinal excitability, quality of life, and goal attainment. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and at 4-week and 12-week follow-up.

Conclusions: This pilot trial will provide the first controlled evidence on whether adjunctive cortical neuromodulation via iTBS produces additional upper limb motor recovery beyond tSCS-based rehabilitation in chronic incomplete cervical SCI. Feasibility data and effect size estimates will inform the design of a subsequent multicenter confirmatory trial.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

24

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronicity: More than 12 months post-injury at enrollment
  • Injury type: Traumatic or non-traumatic incomplete cervical SCI, neurological level C2 to C8
  • AIS classification: Grade C or D
  • UEMS: 10 to 20 out of 25 on the more impaired side; lower bound 10 ensures sufficient voluntary activation for task training and elicitable MEPs, upper bound avoids ceiling effects.
  • Grip strength: MMT grade 3 or higher in finger flexors (C8 myotome) on at least one side.
  • Hand function: Able to transfer at least 1 block across the partition within 60 seconds on the more impaired side.
  • Sitting tolerance: Able to tolerate upright seated posture in own wheelchair for at least 1 continuous hour without symptomatic orthostatic hypotension or pressure-related discomfort requiring position change.
  • Medical stability: No acute medical complications
  • Informed consent: Able to provide written informed consent and comply with the study schedule
  • Medications: Stable regimen for 4 weeks prior, AND participant plus clinician agreement that dosage (baclofen, tizanidine, botulinum toxin) remains unchanged throughout the 12-week intervention; any change logged as protocol deviation
  • Surgical clearance: Cleared by neurosurgeon or orthopedic surgeon for participation in tSCS-based rehabilitation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Seizure history: History of seizures or epilepsy
  • Implanted devices: Intracranial metallic implants, cochlear implants, cardiac pacemakers, or other implanted electronic devices. Cervical spinal instrumentation (e.g., posterior rods, plates, or screws at C2 to T1) is not an exclusion for tSCS provided overlying skin is intact; participants with hardware directly beneath planned electrode sites will undergo low-intensity test stimulation during screening, and electrode placement will be shifted by one interspace if current distortion, focal discomfort, or unexpected motor thresholds are observed. Intracranial hardware remains an absolute exclusion for iTBS.
  • Prior craniotomy: Prior neurosurgical procedure involving craniotomy
  • Pregnancy: Currently pregnant or intending to become pregnant during the study period
  • Psychiatric or cognitive: Active psychiatric illness (eg, untreated major depression, psychosis) or cognitive impairment precluding informed consent
  • Concurrent neurological disease: Progressive or degenerative neurological condition (eg, multiple sclerosis, motor neuron disease)
  • Concurrent trials: Participation in another interventional rehabilitation or neurostimulation trial
  • Skin integrity: Skin lesions or breakdown at electrode placement sites (scalp or posterior cervical spine)
  • Cortical excitability medications: Medications known to alter cortical excitability (eg, antiepileptic drugs, high-dose benzodiazepines) that cannot be stabilized for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Severe spasticity: Modified Tardieu Scale muscle reaction grade 4 (unfatigable clonus >10 s) at elbow or wrist flexors on the more impaired side, or spasticity judged by the treating physician as unresponsive to optimised pharmacological management.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: iTBS combined with tSCS plus standardized upper limb rehabilitation

Interventions are delivered twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions): iTBS over M1 followed by combined tSCS plus upper limb rehabilitation (45-60 min).

tSCS uses a constant-current stimulator with 5×10 cm electrodes at C3-C4 and/or C6-C7, with reference electrodes over the ASIS or clavicles. Parameters: biphasic pulses at 30 Hz, 1 ms pulses with 10 kHz carrier frequency, intensity 40-120 mA, delivered continuously for ~45 minutes.

iTBS is delivered over the M1 hand area contralateral to the more impaired limb. Protocol: 600 pulses (3-pulse bursts at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, 80% AMT over 3-4 minutes.

Upper limb rehabilitation follows immediately, supervised by a physiotherapist and occupational therapist, based on the Up-LIFT trial protocol. Sessions include reaching, finger movements, pinch, grip, bimanual coordination, and individualised functional tasks, with difficulty progressed systematically.
Gerät: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that enhances cortical excitability and corticospinal drive. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a brief patterned form of rTMS, produces lasting facilitatory effects and is more time-efficient. Evidence indicates rTMS improves motor function, reduces spasticity, and enhances neuroplasticity in SCI.
Gerät: Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that delivers electrical stimulation over the spine to activate sensory afferents and enhance spinal motor circuit excitability. Early studies showed it can enable voluntary movement even in motor-complete spinal cord injury (SCI), with subsequent research demonstrating improvements in motor function, standing, and walking in incomplete SCI. Evidence suggests tSCS modulates both spinal and corticospinal pathways, supporting neuroplasticity. The Up-LIFT trial (2024) provided strong clinical evidence, showing that tSCS combined with rehabilitation significantly improved upper limb strength and function in chronic cervical SCI, with 72% of participants meeting effectiveness endpoints and no serious adverse events. Later studies confirmed its safety in home and community settings, though standardization and larger trials remain needed.
Aktiver Komparator: tSCS plus standardized upper limb rehabilitation only

Interventions are delivered twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions).

tSCS uses a constant-current stimulator with 5×10 cm electrodes at C3-C4 and/or C6-C7, with reference electrodes over the ASIS or clavicles. Parameters: biphasic pulses at 30 Hz, 1 ms pulses with 10 kHz carrier frequency, intensity 40-120 mA, delivered continuously for ~45 minutes. The carrier frequency reduces skin discomfort and enables deeper dorsal root activation.

Upper limb rehabilitation follows immediately, supervised by a physiotherapist and occupational therapist, based on the Up-LIFT trial protocol. Sessions include reaching, finger movements, pinch, grip, bimanual coordination, and individualised functional tasks, with difficulty progressed systematically.
Gerät: Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that delivers electrical stimulation over the spine to activate sensory afferents and enhance spinal motor circuit excitability. Early studies showed it can enable voluntary movement even in motor-complete spinal cord injury (SCI), with subsequent research demonstrating improvements in motor function, standing, and walking in incomplete SCI. Evidence suggests tSCS modulates both spinal and corticospinal pathways, supporting neuroplasticity. The Up-LIFT trial (2024) provided strong clinical evidence, showing that tSCS combined with rehabilitation significantly improved upper limb strength and function in chronic cervical SCI, with 72% of participants meeting effectiveness endpoints and no serious adverse events. Later studies confirmed its safety in home and community settings, though standardization and larger trials remain needed.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
The UEMS is a component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination and assesses the strength of 10 key muscles of the upper extremities (5 per side) on a 0 to 5 scale, yielding a score of 0 to 25 per side or 0 to 50 bilaterally. The UEMS has well-established psychometric properties, is sensitive to change in SCI populations. Higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 0
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
The UEMS is a component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination and assesses the strength of 10 key muscles of the upper extremities (5 per side) on a 0 to 5 scale, yielding a score of 0 to 25 per side or 0 to 50 bilaterally. The UEMS has well-established psychometric properties, is sensitive to change in SCI populations. Higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 12
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
The UEMS is a component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination and assesses the strength of 10 key muscles of the upper extremities (5 per side) on a 0 to 5 scale, yielding a score of 0 to 25 per side or 0 to 50 bilaterally. The UEMS has well-established psychometric properties, is sensitive to change in SCI populations. Higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 16
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
The UEMS is a component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination and assesses the strength of 10 key muscles of the upper extremities (5 per side) on a 0 to 5 scale, yielding a score of 0 to 25 per side or 0 to 50 bilaterally. The UEMS has well-established psychometric properties, is sensitive to change in SCI populations. Higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 24

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 2 (GRASSP-2)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
The GRASSP V2 is an assessment for tetraplegia, typically scored across 5 specific subtests rather than a single total sum. Key maximum scores for GRASSP V2 include 50 for Strength (10 muscles x 5), 12 for Dorsal Sensation, 12 for Palmar Sensation, and 30 for Prehension Performance. A higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 0
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 2 (GRASSP-2)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
The GRASSP V2 is an assessment for tetraplegia, typically scored across 5 specific subtests rather than a single total sum. Key maximum scores for GRASSP V2 include 50 for Strength (10 muscles x 5), 12 for Dorsal Sensation, 12 for Palmar Sensation, and 30 for Prehension Performance. A higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 12
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 2 (GRASSP-2)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
The GRASSP V2 is an assessment for tetraplegia, typically scored across 5 specific subtests rather than a single total sum. Key maximum scores for GRASSP V2 include 50 for Strength (10 muscles x 5), 12 for Dorsal Sensation, 12 for Palmar Sensation, and 30 for Prehension Performance. A higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 16
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 2 (GRASSP-2)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
The GRASSP V2 is an assessment for tetraplegia, typically scored across 5 specific subtests rather than a single total sum. Key maximum scores for GRASSP V2 include 50 for Strength (10 muscles x 5), 12 for Dorsal Sensation, 12 for Palmar Sensation, and 30 for Prehension Performance. A higher score indicates better outcomes.
Week 24
Grip/Pinch Strength
Zeitfenster: Week 0
Maximal grip force (Jamar dynamometer), lateral pinch, tip pinch, and tripod pinch (pinch gauge)
Week 0
Grip/Pinch Strength
Zeitfenster: Week 12
Maximal grip force (Jamar dynamometer), lateral pinch, tip pinch, and tripod pinch (pinch gauge)
Week 12
Grip/Pinch Strength
Zeitfenster: Week 16
Maximal grip force (Jamar dynamometer), lateral pinch, tip pinch, and tripod pinch (pinch gauge)
Week 16
Grip/Pinch Strength
Zeitfenster: Week 24
Maximal grip force (Jamar dynamometer), lateral pinch, tip pinch, and tripod pinch (pinch gauge)
Week 24
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Zeitfenster: Week 0
Timed fine motor dexterity assessment. The participant is instructed to pick up the pegs one by one and place them into the holes as fast as possible. Once all pegs are in the holes, the participant immediately removes them one by one and returns them to the container, as fast as possible. The primary score is the number of seconds taken to complete the task. Shorter times indicate better fine manual dexterity.
Week 0
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Zeitfenster: Week 12
Timed fine motor dexterity assessment. The participant is instructed to pick up the pegs one by one and place them into the holes as fast as possible. Once all pegs are in the holes, the participant immediately removes them one by one and returns them to the container, as fast as possible. The primary score is the number of seconds taken to complete the task. Shorter times indicate better fine manual dexterity.t
Week 12
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Zeitfenster: Week 16
Timed fine motor dexterity assessment. The participant is instructed to pick up the pegs one by one and place them into the holes as fast as possible. Once all pegs are in the holes, the participant immediately removes them one by one and returns them to the container, as fast as possible. The primary score is the number of seconds taken to complete the task. Shorter times indicate better fine manual dexterity.
Week 16
Nine-Hole Peg Test
Zeitfenster: Week 24
Timed fine motor dexterity assessment. The participant is instructed to pick up the pegs one by one and place them into the holes as fast as possible. Once all pegs are in the holes, the participant immediately removes them one by one and returns them to the container, as fast as possible. The primary score is the number of seconds taken to complete the task. Shorter times indicate better fine manual dexterity.
Week 24
Box and Block Test
Zeitfenster: Week 0
Gross manual dexterity (number of blocks transferred in 60 seconds)
Week 0
Box and Block Test
Zeitfenster: Week 12
Gross manual dexterity (number of blocks transferred in 60 seconds)
Week 12
Box and Block Test
Zeitfenster: Week 16
Gross manual dexterity (number of blocks transferred in 60 seconds)
Week 16
Box and Block Test
Zeitfenster: Week 24
Gross manual dexterity (number of blocks transferred in 60 seconds)
Week 24
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
CUE-T is a standardized, performance-based assessment tool designed specifically to measure functional limitations in the arms and hands of individuals with tetraplegia due to SCI. It objectively evaluates how well a person can perform basic and instrumental ADLs, such as reaching, grasping, and manipulating objects. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 0
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
CUE-T is a standardized, performance-based assessment tool designed specifically to measure functional limitations in the arms and hands of individuals with tetraplegia due to SCI. It objectively evaluates how well a person can perform basic and instrumental ADLs, such as reaching, grasping, and manipulating objects. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 12
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
CUE-T is a standardized, performance-based assessment tool designed specifically to measure functional limitations in the arms and hands of individuals with tetraplegia due to SCI. It objectively evaluates how well a person can perform basic and instrumental ADLs, such as reaching, grasping, and manipulating objects. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 16
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
CUE-T is a standardized, performance-based assessment tool designed specifically to measure functional limitations in the arms and hands of individuals with tetraplegia due to SCI. It objectively evaluates how well a person can perform basic and instrumental ADLs, such as reaching, grasping, and manipulating objects. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 24
Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
It measures independence in daily activities across three main domains-Self-Care, Respiration/Sphincter Management, and Mobility-with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 0
Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
It measures independence in daily activities across three main domains-Self-Care, Respiration/Sphincter Management, and Mobility-with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 12
Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
It measures independence in daily activities across three main domains-Self-Care, Respiration/Sphincter Management, and Mobility-with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 16
Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
It measures independence in daily activities across three main domains-Self-Care, Respiration/Sphincter Management, and Mobility-with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Week 24
R2-R1 in Modified Tardieu Scale
Zeitfenster: Week 0
Modified Tardieu Scale measures velocity-dependent spasticity of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors. R1 (Angle of Catch) is measured during the fast (V3) stretch, indicating when the spastic reflex is triggered. R2 (Full Range of Motion) is measured during the slow (V1) stretch, indicating the maximum joint angle. A lower R2-R1 value is better (indicating less spasticity and more normal muscle behaviour).
Week 0
R2-R1 in Modified Tardieu Scale
Zeitfenster: Week 6
Modified Tardieu Scale measures velocity-dependent spasticity of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors. R1 (Angle of Catch) is measured during the fast (V3) stretch, indicating when the spastic reflex is triggered. R2 (Full Range of Motion) is measured during the slow (V1) stretch, indicating the maximum joint angle. A lower R2-R1 value is better (indicating less spasticity and more normal muscle behaviour).
Week 6
R2-R1 in Modified Tardieu Scale
Zeitfenster: Week 12
Modified Tardieu Scale measures velocity-dependent spasticity of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors. R1 (Angle of Catch) is measured during the fast (V3) stretch, indicating when the spastic reflex is triggered. R2 (Full Range of Motion) is measured during the slow (V1) stretch, indicating the maximum joint angle. A lower R2-R1 value is better (indicating less spasticity and more normal muscle behaviour).
Week 12
R2-R1 in Modified Tardieu Scale
Zeitfenster: Week 16
Modified Tardieu Scale measures velocity-dependent spasticity of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors. R1 (Angle of Catch) is measured during the fast (V3) stretch, indicating when the spastic reflex is triggered. R2 (Full Range of Motion) is measured during the slow (V1) stretch, indicating the maximum joint angle. A lower R2-R1 value is better (indicating less spasticity and more normal muscle behaviour).
Week 16
R2-R1 in Modified Tardieu Scale
Zeitfenster: Week 24
Modified Tardieu Scale measures velocity-dependent spasticity of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors. R1 (Angle of Catch) is measured during the fast (V3) stretch, indicating when the spastic reflex is triggered. R2 (Full Range of Motion) is measured during the slow (V1) stretch, indicating the maximum joint angle. A lower R2-R1 value is better (indicating less spasticity and more normal muscle behaviour).
Week 24
Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
It evaluates the integrity of the corticospinal tract by subtracting peripheral motor conduction time from the total Motor Evoked Potential (MEP). As per IFCN guidelines: CMCT = MEP latency minus PCT, where PCT = (F-latency + M-latency minus 1) / 2. A shorter CMCT indicates better outcome.
Week 0
Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
It evaluates the integrity of the corticospinal tract by subtracting peripheral motor conduction time from the total Motor Evoked Potential (MEP). As per IFCN guidelines: CMCT = MEP latency minus PCT, where PCT = (F-latency + M-latency minus 1) / 2. A shorter CMCT indicates better outcome.
Week 12
Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
It evaluates the integrity of the corticospinal tract by subtracting peripheral motor conduction time from the total Motor Evoked Potential (MEP). As per IFCN guidelines: CMCT = MEP latency minus PCT, where PCT = (F-latency + M-latency minus 1) / 2. A shorter CMCT indicates better outcome.
Week 16
Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
It evaluates the integrity of the corticospinal tract by subtracting peripheral motor conduction time from the total Motor Evoked Potential (MEP). As per IFCN guidelines: CMCT = MEP latency minus PCT, where PCT = (F-latency + M-latency minus 1) / 2. A shorter CMCT indicates better outcome.
Week 24
peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Amplitude, latency, resting and active motor thresholds from FDI and APB will be recorded. The bigger value of peak-to peak amplitude of MEP indicates better outcome
Week 0
peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Amplitude, latency, resting and active motor thresholds from FDI and APB will be recorded. The bigger value of peak-to peak amplitude of MEP indicates better outcome
Week 12
peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Amplitude, latency, resting and active motor thresholds from FDI and APB will be recorded. The bigger value of peak-to peak amplitude of MEP indicates better outcomes.
Week 16
peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Amplitude, latency, resting and active motor thresholds from FDI and APB will be recorded. The bigger value of peak-to peak amplitude of MEP indicates better outcome
Week 24
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, self-reported questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension scores from 1 to5, with higher score indicating worse outcome.
Week 0
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, self-reported questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension scores from 1 to5, with higher score indicating worse outcome.
Week 12
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, self-reported questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension scores from 1 to5, with higher score indicating worse outcome.
Week 24
Modified goal attainment scale (GAS)
Zeitfenster: Week 0
Patient-identified goals scored on a standardized attainment scale. Generally, a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Week 0
Modified goal attainment scale (GAS)
Zeitfenster: Week 12
Patient-identified goals scored on a standardized attainment scale. Generally, a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Week 12
Modified goal attainment scale (GAS)
Zeitfenster: Week 16
Patient-identified goals scored on a standardized attainment scale. Generally, a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Week 16
Modified goal attainment scale (GAS)
Zeitfenster: Week 24
Patient-identified goals scored on a standardized attainment scale. Generally, a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Week 24

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

National University Hospital, Singapore

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Gobinathan Chandran, MBBS, NUH

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

30. März 2027

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Juni 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. Dezember 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

8. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

8. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

8. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 1833493

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

According to institution research polices, research agreement needs to be signed before sharing individual data with external parties.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Ja

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Ja

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Rückenmarksverletzungen (SCI)

Klinische Studien zur Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Georgia

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren