Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Novel Pre-Surgery Exercise-Conditioning in Patients Waiting for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) (P-SEC)

Total knee replacement (TKR) is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from long standing severe pain, functional limitation and instability caused by osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint's surfaces. Long standing arthritic joint surfaces, more often lead to pain and swelling and other physical factors that may contribute to knee joint instability. This instability causes a feeling of 'unsteadiness' whilst walking and may also contribute to falls. In view of the latter, it is important for this issue of 'unsteadiness' to be addressed. TKR helps to remove the cause of pain and swelling, but exercises are crucial to counteract the joint' instability and any feeling of 'unsteadiness' before and after surgery. However, research hasn't yet identified the optimum approach for delivering exercises that will help in patients' rehabilitation. Current studies have tried to incorporate rehabilitation programmes to improve this issue, but required a delivery of 6-8 weeks of exercises which has resulted in a logistical burden in view of the long duration. We have scientifically developed a new programme of exercise for the muscles of the knee that can be delivered during a single week prior to surgery. The pre-surgery exercise-programme (P-SEC), potentially offers similar effectiveness for improving the feeling of 'unsteadiness' and muscle' fitness as programmes that last much longer. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is to test the effectiveness of this new, short approach to exercising in patients who are waiting for a TKR surgery.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from severe pain and functional limitation caused by osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint's surfaces (Magee et al. 2009). Within the UK, over 60,000 TKA surgeries are registered yearly (NJR 2015), making TKA one of the most common surgeries of the joint. Rehabilitation following surgery is essential for recovery and with TKA this is crucial in regaining movement, function and control. Current rehabilitation mainly focuses on post-surgery rehabilitation to increase range of motion (ROM) and muscle power, and to aid in achieving a quick return to functional independence for patients. Despite this, research has shown that patients undergoing TKA, still continue to experience reduced capacities in neuromuscular responses which are required for quick knee joint reactions, stability and proprioception, up to months following TKA surgery (Silva et al. 2003). A deficit in an individual's knee joint proprioception (synonymously referred to as a deficit in sensorimotor performance), together with impaired strength, can lead to reduced functional balance capabilities and movement control (Piva et al. 2010; Rätsepsoo et al. 2011), and can also contribute to injury (Lephart et al. 1997) and a greater risk of falls (Swinkels et al. 2009; Bade et al. 2010; Rätsepsoo et al. 2011). In part, the latter may be due to time-constraints within the health-care system, where a necessary preservation of the primary focus, to decrease pain and improve general function in patients following a TKA, has sometimes been to the detriment of other aspects of rehabilitation.

Pre-surgery exercise-conditioning:

Studies have investigated the effects of pre-surgery exercise' (also known as pre-habilitation exercise) interventions on strength and sensorimotor performance deficits in patients undergoing TKA, through various modes of exercise. Their aim has been to utilise a period of time pre-surgery to improve patients' rehabilitation status (Huber et al. 2015; Topp et al. 2009; Desmueles et al. 2013; Mackay et al. 2012). However, the patterns of patients' adaptations to the generic exercise stimuli used within these studies, has not shown the gains that had been expected by physiological dose-response, and ultimately questioned the efficacy of using pre-habilitation for effective gains in long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the concept of achieving early gains to conditioning status that might potentiate patients' later rehabilitation processes and status, remains attractive to the latter (Calatayud et al. 2016, Huber et al. 2015) and the NHS (Rooks et al. 2006; Crowe and Henderson, 2003).

Conditioning for enhanced sensorimotor performance has been consistently endorsed in the sports-medical and sports-performance (Hubscher et al. 2010; Mandelbaum et al. 2005) and clinical literature (Tsao et al. 2007; Granacher et al. 2006) for its causal relationship to reduced injury likelihood and capability to improve function. While the precise dose of stimuli to achieve gains in sensorimotor performance is less clearly defined, enhancing motor performance by means of exercise that resist the effects of gravity or externally-applied loading to a joint system, has established underpinnings physiologically by improving motor performance and indirectly effecting sensorimotor responses (Vikne et al. 2006; Hakan et al. 2002; Moran et al. 2007). Clinically, the challenge has been to formulate a suitably pragmatic programme of conditioning that will accommodate the time- and cost-pressures associated with contemporary care practice while simultaneously offering efficacy when delivered prior to surgery as a pre-habilitative intervention. Rehabilitative and prophylactic conditioning programmes used in current studies for enhanced neuromuscular and sensorimotor performance, have typically required and been delivered in a duration of 6-8-weeks (Calatayud et al. 2016; Huber et al. 2015; Topp et al. 2009; Desmueles et al. 2013; Mackay et al. 2012). This has commanded a substantive logistical burden to elicit expected gains.

A novel approach to conditioning - Development of the P-SEC protocol:

A novel formulation of conditioning that could condense the pattern of delivery of physiologically-effective, dose-related stimuli, while simultaneously maintaining the vast proportion of potential gains in performance, would offer advantages to patients and clinicians for logistical versatility with which a package of conditioning might be delivered. This would be especially important within the relatively short period of time between the patients electing for surgery after clinical consultation and a surgical procedure, if pre-habilitation were to be incorporated effectively within care pathways. Recent studies have shown that with careful periodization and micro-cyclical management of the mode of exercise-conditioning, patterning of exercise intensity and work/recovery ratios, and progression of increasing physiological stimuli for adaptation, it is possible to deliver gains in neuromuscular performance within a programme lasting 2-3-weeks, which match 70% of the effects expected during longer programmes (Peer and Gleeson, in press; Peer et al. under review). Additional adaptations to this intervention model would be needed to counteract arthrogenic and autogenic sources of inhibition associated with long-term disease conditions such as OA (Rice et al. 2010), limiting neuromuscular performance and conditioning gains by the intrusion of nociceptive stimuli such as an increase in intra-articular joint pressure (Palmieri-Smith et al. 2007). The cost-neutrality of the embedding pre-habilitative conditioning for improved motor performance might be feasible if a portion of the end-phase rehabilitation following a surgical procedure, which has been shown recently to offer limited gains in performance within the formal care pathway (Bailey et al. 2014), could be sacrificed in favour of an equivalent time- period of conditioning prior to surgery.

Therefore, the purpose of the P-SEC study is to undertake a randomized controlled feasibility trial in order to investigate the effects of this new formulation of exercise-conditioning for motor performance on objectively-measured and patient-perceived sensorimotor, functional and psychophysiological performance capacities in patients waiting for a TKA.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

46

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Gobowen
      • Oswestry, Gobowen, Reino Unido, SY10 7AG
        • Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt NHS Trust Foundation

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and Females over the age of 18, diagnosed with severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and awaiting a TKA (Including contralateral knee OA/TKA and/or other orthopaedic conditions affecting the contralateral leg)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals undertaking TKA due to a knee joint disease other than osteoarthritis
  • Rheumatic disorder
  • Neurological disorders
  • Other orthopaedic conditions affecting lower body function
  • Individuals with reduced mental capacity affecting their ability to follow exercise programme

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Triple

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Exercise group 1
This group of patients will receive the P-SEC exercise intervention protocol on their 'surgical' leg in addition to their normal pre-surgical care.
The P-SEC protocol is designed to deliver a focal mode of exercise-conditioning for motor performance to the knee extensor musculature. The latter requires a brief, machine-based gravity-resisted joint' movements (<2 seconds). An exercise session (6-minutes, approximately) will require a patient to undertake 4 sets of movement, with sets separated by 60-seconds recovery (delivering a total of 36 exercises across 3 interspersed days).
Experimental: Exercise group 2
This group of patients will receive the P-SEC exercise intervention protocol on their 'non-surgical' leg in addition to their normal pre-surgical care.
The P-SEC protocol is designed to deliver a focal mode of exercise-conditioning for motor performance to the knee extensor musculature. The latter requires a brief, machine-based gravity-resisted joint' movements (<2 seconds). An exercise session (6-minutes, approximately) will require a patient to undertake 4 sets of movement, with sets separated by 60-seconds recovery (delivering a total of 36 exercises across 3 interspersed days).
Comparador activo: Control group
This group of patients will not receive the P-SEC protocol but will follow normal pre-surgical care along with the other two groups of patients.
Routine pre-surgical care

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Electromechanical delay (EMD)
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
The primary outcome measure for this study is the measurement of Electromechanical Delay (EMD) of the knee extensor musculature. The data obtained will give an indication of the participants' sensorimotor and neuromuscular performance capacities. Measurements of the latter's activity will be obtained from electromechanical signals collected by a purpose built dynamometer (Gleeson et al. 2013) and EMG signals obtained from surface electrodes over the knee extensor musculature.
11 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Balance Force plate
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Measurement of postural control indices through the use of a standing balance force plate
11 months
Peak Force (PF)
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Further measurements of Sensorimotor and Neuromuscular performance capacities using data obtained from the EMG and seated dynamometer used for the primary outcome measurement.
11 months
Rate of force Development (RFD)
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Further measurements of Sensorimotor and Neuromuscular performance capacities using data obtained from the EMG and seated dynamometer used for the primary outcome measurement.
11 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis questionnaire (KOOS) questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Subjective measurement of patients' performance capacity
11 months
Oxford Knee score (OKS)
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Subjective measurement of patients' performance capacity
11 months
Performance profile questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Subjective measurement of patients' performance capacity
11 months
Pain self efficacy questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Subjective measurement of patients' performance capacity
11 months
Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF36v2)
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Subjective measurement of patients' performance capacity
11 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Periodo de tiempo: 11 months
Subjective measurement of patients' performance capacity
11 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Nigel Gleeson, Prof., Queen Margaret University
  • Investigador principal: Anna Maria Risso, Ms, Queen Margaret University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

15 de mayo de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

17 de abril de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

17 de abril de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de abril de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de abril de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

13 de abril de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de marzo de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de marzo de 2020

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre P-SEC Pre-Surgical Care

Suscribir