Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Healing After Conventional And Laser Assisted Frenectomy Operations
9 de junio de 2018 actualizado por: Marmara University
The aim of this randomized controlled parallel-designed study was to evaluate clinical healing and patient comfort after conventional and diode laser assisted frenectomy operations in case of high papillary frenulum attachment.
Forty-eight patients with high papillary frenulum attachments were included in the study.
Patients were randomly divided into three groups; conventional frenectomy operation (Group C), frenectomy operation using diode laser (Group L) and diode laser asissted frenectomy with horizontal incision on the periosteum (Group L+P).
Postoperative pain, difficulty in speaking and eating scores were assessed postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Evaluation of epithelialization of the wound surface was carried out via hydrogen peroxide to the surface using a dental injector at postoperative 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.
Plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing and probing depth were assessed at baseline and postoperative 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.
All data were compared between groups and within each group.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
48
Fase
- No aplica
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años a 65 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Todos
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Systemically healthy, nonsmoker, aged between 18 and 65, high papillary frenulum attachment diagnosed according to Mirko et al (Mirko et al, 1974), not received any periodontal treatment within the last 3 months, presence of at least central, lateral incisors and canines at the upper jaw, and consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any systemic disease that might interfere with the prognosis of periodontal disease (i.e., diabetes mellitus, HIV infection), smoking, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs or any other medication taken within the last 6 months that might affect the outcome of the study, any physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude normal oral hygiene procedures.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Conventional Frenectomy
For the conventional surgery, after application of local infiltration anesthesia of articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000, the frenulum was grasped with a straight haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule; the tissue adjacent to the upper and lower surfaces of the haemostat was incised with a no.15 scalpel.
After the diamond shaped resected portion of the frenulum was removed with the haemostat, muscle dilatations were excised on the submucosa of the lateral walls of the cavity.
Horizontal incision was made on the periosteum with the help of a scalpel following the procedure.
At the end of the operation, the wound was closed with absorbable sutures (4-0, Pegelak®, Doğsan Turkey).
|
Frenectomy operation performed by surgical blades with suturing.
|
|
Experimental: Diode Laser Frenectomy
For the laser frenectomy, a diode laser device (λ = 810 nm, W: 4, GIGA Cheese II, China) was used to perform the procedure.
The procedure was performed under local infiltration anesthesia with articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000.
The frenlum was held by a haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule while laser energy was applied to the upper and lower parts of the frenulum adjacent to the haemostat via a fibre tip (400 µm diameter, plain-ended, optical fibre).
The laser was carefully applied to the tissue and care was taken to avoid local necrosis of the periosteum or any bone structure.Following the bleeding control, the wound site was left to secondary healing.
No sutures were necessary after procedure.
|
Diode Laser assisted frenectomy operation.
|
|
Experimental: Laser Frenectomy with Incision
For the laser frenectomy, a diode laser device (λ = 810 nm, W: 4, GIGA Cheese II, China) was used to perform the procedure.
The procedure was performed under local infiltration anesthesia with articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000.
The frenulum was held by a haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule while laser energy was applied to the upper and lower parts of the frenulum adjacent to the haemostat via a fibre tip (400 µm diameter, plain-ended, optical fibre).
The laser was carefully applied to the tissue and care was taken to avoid local necrosis of the periosteum.
Horizontal incision was made on the periosteum with the help of a scalpel, additionally.
No sutures were necessary after procedure.
|
Diode Laser assisted frenectomy operation.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain Change
Periodo de tiempo: Postoperative pain, difficulty during speaking and eating scores were assessed on postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.
|
Postoperative pain during eating and speaking will be evaluate via visual analog scale (VAS).Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain, discomfort during speaking and chewing.
VAS consisted of a horizontal line with a range of numbers from '0' to '10' of which '0' means 'no pain' and '10' means unbearable pain.
|
Postoperative pain, difficulty during speaking and eating scores were assessed on postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
1 de septiembre de 2016
Finalización primaria (Actual)
1 de octubre de 2017
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
1 de octubre de 2017
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
31 de marzo de 2018
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
9 de junio de 2018
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
12 de junio de 2018
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
12 de junio de 2018
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
9 de junio de 2018
Última verificación
1 de junio de 2018
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- Cetinkaya et al.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .
Ensayos clínicos sobre Frenillo; Hipertrofia, Labio
-
CytaCoat ABReclutamientoSeguridad del catéter Foley CytaCoat LIP | Tolerabilidad del catéter Foley CytaCoat LIPSuecia