Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Functional and Affective Effects of a Brief tDCS Intervention in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (FibFatDCS)

1 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Oznur Buran Sevik, Hospital Donostia
Functional and Affective Effects of a brief tDCS Intervention in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are characterized by persistent, multidimensional symptoms arising from complex brain-body interactions that impair functioning and quality of life. Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been proposed as adjunctive approaches to support short-term functional changes within distributed neural systems, although evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. The objective is to examine immediate pre-post changes in multidimensional clinical outcomes following a standardized tDCS protocol in patients with FM and CFS, and to explore potential diagnosis-related response patterns.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Abstract Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are characterized by persistent, multidimensional symptoms arising from complex brain-body interactions that impair functioning and quality of life. Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been proposed as adjunctive approaches to support short-term functional changes within distributed neural systems, although evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Objective: To examine immediate pre-post changes in multidimensional clinical outcomes following a standardized tDCS protocol in patients with FM and CFS, and to explore potential diagnosis-related response patterns. Methods: Fifteen patients (FM: n = 5; CFS: n = 10) received 10 sessions of tDCS (20 minutes per session) administered over two consecutive weeks (five sessions per week). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately after treatment completion. Measures included the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS), pain thermometer, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Pre-post comparisons were conducted at the whole-sample level, followed by exploratory analyses stratified by diagnosis. Results: At baseline, patients with FM showed lower COMPASS, FSS, FAS, and HADS scores, and higher SF-36 scores, compared to patients with CFS, indicating a relatively less severe clinical profile. Across the sample, pre-post comparisons indicated improvements in FIQ and HADS scores. Exploratory group-specific analyses suggested that FM patients exhibited reductions in depressive symptoms, whereas CFS patients showed improvements in quality of life (SF-36) and functional impact (FIQ). No significant changes were observed in subjective pain intensity or fatigue severity (FSS). Conclusions: These findings suggest partially distinct clinical profiles and differential responsiveness to tDCS across FM and CFS, within the context of baseline differences between groups. Improvements appeared domain-specific, with affective symptoms responding in FM and functional outcomes in CFS, while core symptoms such as pain and fatigue remained unchanged over the intervention period. This pattern provides preliminary support for the idea that short-term neuromodulation may preferentially influence higher-order regulatory processes rather than core symptom generators, underscoring the need for tailored, multidimensional treatment approaches. Nevertheless, given the small sample size, absence of a control condition, and exploratory nature of subgroup analyses, these results should be interpreted with caution. Further controlled

studies are needed to clarify the reliability, specificity, and clinical relevance of these effects.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

20

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Gipuzkoa
      • San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, España, 20250
        • Hospital Universitario de Donostia

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia
  • Diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having both conditions at the same time

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: The patients with Fibromyalgia
The same treatment is applied (tDCS)
It is an neuromodulation technic
Comparador activo: The patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
The same treatment is applied ( tDCS)
It is a neuromodulation technic

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Visual Pain Scores (VAS)
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
It is measured before and inmediately after the treatment ( tDCS) is applied. (0-10) Higher scores mean more pain.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
It measures the impact of fibromyalgia (Scores: 0-100) The FIQ is scored in such a way that a higher score indicates a greater impact of the syndrome on the person.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Adolfo Lopez de Munain, Doctor, University Hospital of Donostia
  • Director de estudio: PEDRO MONTOYA, UNIVERSITY OF BALEARIC ISLANDS, MALLORCA

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

  • Moldofsky H. Fibromyalgia, sleep disorder and chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:262-71; discussion 272-9. doi: 10.1002/9780470514382.ch15. PMID: 8491102.
  • McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004. PMID: 8277801.
  • Lloyd, D. M., Wittkopf, P. G., Arendsen, L. J., & Jones, A. K. P. (2020). Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Pain, 21(11-12), 1085-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2020.01.003
  • Lerdal A, Kottorp A. Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale-Rasch analyses of individual responses in a Norwegian stroke cohort. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Oct;48(10):1258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Mar 16. PMID: 21414620.
  • Hendriks C, Drent M, Elfferich M, De Vries J. The Fatigue Assessment Scale: quality and availability in sarcoidosis and other diseases. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018 Sep;24(5):495-503. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000496. PMID: 29889115
  • Hawker, G. A., et al. (2011).Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain). Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S240-S252. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543
  • Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; Board on the Health of Select Populations; Institute of Medicine. Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Feb 10. 7, Recommendations. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK284910/
  • Burckhardt CS1, Clark SR, Bennett RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation.J Rheumatol. 1991 May;18(5):728-33.
  • Bartholomew EJ, Medvedev ON, Petrie KJ, Chalder T. Rasch analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2025 Oct;197:112370. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112370. Epub 2025 Sep 3. PMID: 40939313.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2025

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2025

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

30 de mayo de 2025

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

21 de abril de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

7 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

7 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

IPD may be shared upon reasonable request, subject to ethical approval and data use agreements.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Transcraneal Direct Current Electric Stimulation (tDCS)

Suscribir