Electromyographic Response to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Healthy Adults
Electromyographic Analysis of Immediate Neuromuscular Response After Low-Load Knee Extension Exercise With and Without Blood Flow Restriction in Healthy Adults
This pilot randomized contralateral within-participant study evaluated the immediate neuromuscular response to low-load knee extension exercise performed with and without blood flow restriction in healthy young adults.
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two limb-allocation groups: blood flow restriction applied to the dominant limb or blood flow restriction applied to the non-dominant limb. In each participant, the contralateral limb completed the same exercise protocol without blood flow restriction. Therefore, all participants were assessed under both experimental conditions.
Both limb-specific conditions were completed during the same experimental session. The order of the blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction conditions was randomized for each participant, with a 10-minute rest period between conditions.
Blood flow restriction was applied using a pneumatic cuff positioned on the proximal thigh. Cuff pressure was individualized and set at 80% of the arterial occlusion pressure measured for the corresponding limb. Participants completed the same standardized low-load knee extension protocol under both conditions.
Surface electromyography was used to record vastus lateralis activity from each assessed limb during the exercise protocol. Muscle activity was primarily evaluated using root mean square amplitude normalized to the pre-exercise maximal voluntary isometric contraction recorded from the corresponding limb. Root mean square amplitude during maximal voluntary isometric contraction trials was also recorded before and immediately after each condition.
The study aimed to compare the electromyographic response between the blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction conditions and to determine whether this response differed according to whether blood flow restriction was applied to the dominant or non-dominant limb.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Badajoz
-
Badajoz, Badajoz, España, 06006
- University of Extremadura
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 65 years.
- Healthy adults.
- Absence of active pain or musculoskeletal injury in the lower limbs at the time of assessment.
- Ability to understand the study procedures.
- Voluntary agreement to participate and provision of written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of neuromuscular disease.
- History of cardiovascular disease.
- History of peripheral vascular disease.
- History of thromboembolic events.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- Skin lesions or skin conditions preventing placement of the blood flow restriction cuff or surface electromyography electrodes.
- Recent lower limb surgery.
- Pregnancy.
- Any other contraindication to blood flow restriction exercise.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental: BFR allocated to the dominant limb
Participants received blood flow restriction on the dominant limb, while the contralateral non-dominant limb completed the same low-load knee extension protocol without blood flow restriction.
Both limb-specific conditions were performed during the same experimental session in randomized order, with a 10-minute rest period between conditions.
Blood flow restriction pressure was individualized and set at 80% of the arterial occlusion pressure of the corresponding limb.
Vastus lateralis surface electromyography was recorded under both conditions.
|
Each participant completed the low-load knee extension exercise protocol separately with both lower limbs.
Under each condition, the protocol comprised 75 repetitions distributed across four sets of 30, 15, 15, and 15 repetitions, with 30 seconds of rest between sets.
One limb performed the protocol with blood flow restriction and the contralateral limb performed it without blood flow restriction.
Condition order was randomized, and a 10-minute rest period was provided between the two limb-specific conditions.
Vastus lateralis surface electromyography was recorded continuously during each protocol.
A pneumatic cuff was placed on the proximal thigh of the limb randomized to the blood flow restriction condition and inflated to 80% of the individualized arterial occlusion pressure during the low-load knee extension protocol.
The cuff was not applied to the contralateral limb, which completed the same protocol under the non-blood flow restriction condition.
The cuff was fully deflated and removed after completion of the blood flow restriction condition.
|
|
Experimental: Experimental: BFR allocated to the non-dominant limb
Participants received blood flow restriction on the non-dominant limb, while the contralateral dominant limb completed the same low-load knee extension protocol without blood flow restriction.
Both limb-specific conditions were performed during the same experimental session in randomized order, with a 10-minute rest period between conditions.
Blood flow restriction pressure was individualized and set at 80% of the arterial occlusion pressure of the corresponding limb.
Vastus lateralis surface electromyography was recorded under both conditions.
|
Each participant completed the low-load knee extension exercise protocol separately with both lower limbs.
Under each condition, the protocol comprised 75 repetitions distributed across four sets of 30, 15, 15, and 15 repetitions, with 30 seconds of rest between sets.
One limb performed the protocol with blood flow restriction and the contralateral limb performed it without blood flow restriction.
Condition order was randomized, and a 10-minute rest period was provided between the two limb-specific conditions.
Vastus lateralis surface electromyography was recorded continuously during each protocol.
A pneumatic cuff was placed on the proximal thigh of the limb randomized to the blood flow restriction condition and inflated to 80% of the individualized arterial occlusion pressure during the low-load knee extension protocol.
The cuff was not applied to the contralateral limb, which completed the same protocol under the non-blood flow restriction condition.
The cuff was fully deflated and removed after completion of the blood flow restriction condition.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Vastus Lateralis Electromyographic Amplitude Normalized to Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction
Periodo de tiempo: During the exercise protocol, within a single experimental session.
|
Surface electromyographic activity of the vastus lateralis was assessed during the low-load knee extension exercise protocol.
The root mean square amplitude was normalized to the maximal voluntary isometric contraction recorded before exercise and expressed as percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC).
Measurements were extracted at predefined time points across the four exercise sets in both experimental conditions.
|
During the exercise protocol, within a single experimental session.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 13
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .