- ICH GCP
- Yhdysvaltain kliinisten tutkimusten rekisteri
- Kliininen tutkimus NCT01838746
CRAGS (Coronary aRtery diseAse in younG adultS) (CRAGS)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients Aged < 50 Years: a Multicenter Study
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
Age is, without any doubt, one of the most important risk factors for adverse events after any cardiovascular procedure and because of this it is incorporated in all major risk scoring methods. There is abundant literature dealing with the outcome of elderly patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures as their operative risk is significantly increased and preoperative risk assessment is of great importance in the decision-making process of these fragile patients (1). In the very elderly patients percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an attractive treatment method, particularly in those with multiple comorbidities (2). On the other hand, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been shown to be a durable procedure also among octogenarians (2).
Young patients requiring myocardial revascularization are generally considered at low operative risk, but data on their immediate and late outcome are scarce. However, the decision-making process in these young patients is complicated by the potentially aggressive nature of premature coronary artery disease and their likely long expectancy of life, which expose them to a significantly higher risk of recurrent coronary events as well as the need of repeat revascularization. CABG seems to more durable compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (3), particularly because of excellent late results with the use arterial grafts (4). Therefore, young patients with diffuse coronary artery diffuse may likely benefit of surgical revascularization. However, no formal comparative analysis of these two treatment methods has been previously performed in this young patient population. Since CABG is a major procedure with a potential risk of operative mortality and major morbidity, this is an argument against surgical revascularization, even if recent pooled data showed that it can be performed with an exceedingly low mortality risk (0.9%) (Biancari et al. submitted, Fig. 1).
Such a low postoperative mortality rate is similar to that reported by Khawaja et al. (5) in patients aged ≤ 50 years treated by PCI (0.86%). However, PCI was performed in 41% of these patients with single vessel coronary artery disease. This is likely to significantly differ from surgical series (6).
Only two studies evaluated the outcome after CABG in patients aged < 40 years (7) and < 50 years (8) and estimated a survival rate at 10 years of about 75%. A study by Ellis (9) addressed survival after PCI in 86 patients aged < 40 years and showed a 10-year survival rate of about 91%, but a significant number of patients underwent repeat PCI (37%) and/or CABG (22%). These findings should be viewed in the light of the fact that most of patients did not have diffuse coronary artery disease (3-vessel disease was present in 11% of patients) and they were treated about two decades ago. Khawaja et al. (6) reported on 2922 patients aged ≤ 50 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention since 1979 and having a 5-year survival of about 95%. They reported repeat target revascularization rates ranging from 19% to 27% according to different study periods.
The lack of data on long-term outcome as well as on operative details (in particular, on the use of arterial grafts) and peri- and postoperative medication prevent any conclusive results on the durability either of CABG of PCI in these young patients. Furthermore, recent advances in stents technology as well in peri- and postoperative medical treatment indicate the need a comparative study to define the baseline characteristics of patients aged < 50 years undergoing either PCI or CABG and to evaluate their current immediate and late outcome.
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Odotettu)
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
-
Reykjavik, Islanti
- University of Iceland
-
-
-
-
-
Catania, Italia
- University of Catania
-
Verona, Italia
- University of Verona Medical School
-
-
-
-
-
Göteborg, Ruotsi
- Sahlgrenska Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Oulu, Suomi
- Oulu University Hospital
-
Pori, Suomi
- Satakunta Central Hospital
-
Tampere, Suomi
- Tampere University Hospital
-
Turku, Suomi
- Turku University Hospital
-
Vaasa, Suomi
- Vaasa Central Hospital
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella
Näytteenottomenetelmä
Tutkimusväestö
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- age < 50
Exclusion Criteria:
- age > 50
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
Kohortit ja interventiot
Ryhmä/Kohortti |
---|
PCI
Patients undergoing PCI
|
CABG
Patients undergoing CABG
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
---|---|---|
Repeat revascularization
Aikaikkuna: Three years
|
Any percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting after primary revascularization
|
Three years
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Aikaikkuna |
---|---|
Kaiken syyn aiheuttama kuolleisuus
Aikaikkuna: Kolme vuotta
|
Kolme vuotta
|
Major cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE)
Aikaikkuna: Three years
|
Three years
|
Stroke
Aikaikkuna: Three years
|
Three years
|
Myocardial infarction
Aikaikkuna: Three years
|
Three years
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Yhteistyökumppanit
Tutkijat
- Päätutkija: Fausto Biancari, MD, PhD, Oulu University Hospital
- Opintojen puheenjohtaja: Juhani Airaksinen, MD, PhD, Turku University Hospital
Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä
Yleiset julkaisut
- Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Stahle E, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Serruys PW, Colombo A. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
- Gunn J, Kuttila K, Vasques F, Virtanen R, Lahti A, Airaksinen J, Biancari F. Comparison of results of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 15;110(8):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.055. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- Nissinen J, Wistbacka JO, Loponen P, Korpilahti K, Teittinen K, Virkkila M, Tarkka M, Biancari F. Coronary artery bypass surgery in octogenarians: long-term outcome can be better than expected. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.063.
- Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Joyce LD, Park SJ, Burkhart HM, Suri RM, Greason KL, Stulak JM, Li Z, Daly RC. Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2012 Aug 28;126(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084624. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
- Cole JH, Miller JI 3rd, Sperling LS, Weintraub WS. Long-term follow-up of coronary artery disease presenting in young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 19;41(4):521-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02862-0.
- Canver CC, Nichols RD, Cooler SD, Heisey DM, Murray EL, Kroncke GM. Influence of increasing age on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Oct;62(4):1123-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00446-8.
- Ellis CJ, French JK, White HD, Ormiston JA, Whitlock RM, Webster MW. Results of percutaneous coronary angioplasty in patients <40 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jul 15;82(2):135-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00318-x.
- Lautamaki A, Airaksinen KE, Kiviniemi T, Vinco G, Ribichini F, Gunn J, Anttila V, Heikkinen J, Korpilahti K, Karjalainen P, Kajander O, Eskola M, Ilveskoski E, Axelsson T, Gudbjartsson T, Jeppsson A, Biancari F. Prognosis and disease progression in patients under 50 years old undergoing PCI: the CRAGS (Coronary aRtery diseAse in younG adultS) study. Atherosclerosis. 2014 Aug;235(2):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.953. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
- Biancari F, Gudbjartsson T, Heikkinen J, Anttila V, Makikallio T, Jeppsson A, Thimour-Bergstrom L, Mignosa C, Rubino AS, Kuttila K, Gunn J, Wistbacka JO, Teittinen K, Korpilahti K, Onorati F, Faggian G, Vinco G, Vassanelli C, Ribichini F, Juvonen T, Axelsson TA, Sigurdsson AF, Karjalainen PP, Mennander A, Kajander O, Eskola M, Ilveskoski E, D'Oria V, De Feo M, Kiviniemi T, Airaksinen KE. Comparison of 30-day and 5-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged</=50 years (the Coronary aRtery diseAse in younG adultS Study). Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;114(2):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 May 2.
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Odotettu)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Arvio)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Arvio)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Avainsanat
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- CRAGS-1
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .
Kliiniset tutkimukset Sepelvaltimotauti
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaAstraZenecaValmisPotilaat, joille on määrä tehdä PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) CTO (krooninen kokonaistukkos)Espanja