Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Comparative Efficacy of Various Non-invasive Methods in Assessing Response to Beta-blockers as Secondary Prophylaxis for Acute Variceal Bleed.

28 décembre 2021 mis à jour par: Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Portal hypertension (PH) is a common complication of chronic liver disease and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. One of the most serious complications of liver cirrhosis is esophageal varices (EV) bleeding. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for detecting portal hypertension and its complications. Furthermore, HVPG is the most reliable method for assessing the efficacy of treatment with nonselective -blockers (NSBB), which is the preferred therapy in patients with EV who are at high risk of bleeding (HRV) and as a secondary prophylaxis in the prevention of rebleed. However, the HVPG is an invasive method that is not widely used and necessitates specialized skills. For these reasons, clinical research over the last decade has been focused on identifying non-invasive tests (NITs) capable of evaluating the PH degree and its changes. The most investigated non-invasive tests are liver and splenic stiffness measurement. In advanced cirrhosis, the increase in portal pressure is less dependent on intrahepatic resistance to portal flow due to fibrosis progression and more dependent on extra-hepatic factors such as hyperdynamic circulation and splanchnic vasodilation hence correlation between LSM and PH decreases for HVPG values higher than 12 mmHg.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Aim:

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests in predicting response to NSBB for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleed at 6wks.

Primary objective:

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive modalities in correctly predicting response to beta-blockers as compared with HVPG in preventing variceal rebleed at 6 weeks.

Secondary objectives:

  • Assessment of severity of portal hypertension by non-invasive methods.
  • Correlation and Cut-off values for non-invasive methods in responders and non-responders.
  • AAR, APRI, FIB-4 index, CSPH risk score,fibrosis index, GPR, King's score, Lok score are other non- invasive tests.
  • Correlation between HVPG &non invasive test, responder and non-responder.
  • Comparison ofhypersplenism(Splenic volume and area) and hematological parameters before and after treatment.
  • Diagnosis and response assessment by convolutional neural network- AI based model.
  • Prognostic implication of HVPG rebleed on EVL+beta-blockers.

Methodology:

  • Study population:All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion
  • Study design: Prospective observational study. The study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology ILBS.
  • Study period: 1.5 years
  • Sample size: Assuming that Sn of 92%, α of 5%, Power 80, we need to have 186 patients. So we decided to enroll ~200 cases (Including 5% defaulter rate)

Intervention:

  • HVPG done at the baseline within 5days of acute variceal bleed and at 6weeks
  • Endoscopic variceal band ligation at 3rd week
  • NSBB started on day 6 which optimised according to heart rate and continued for 6 weeks.
  • Monitoring and assessment
  • Patients with acute variceal bleed after endovariceal band ligation will be undergoing HVPG, TE to measure splenic stiffness and baseline investigations such as complete blood count, liver and kidney function test, ultrasonography of the abdomen, contrast enhanced computerized tomography of abdomen. These investigations will be carried out within 5days. After 5 days NSBB is started and is optimsed to maximum dose according to heart rate and blood pressure. After 3 weeks EVL is done. After 6 weeks of NSBB, after 3weeks of secondary EVL;HVPG, TE to measure liver and splenic stiffness and other baseline investigations are done.

    • Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG):

  • Prior to the HVPG measurement, a venous access was performed under ultrasonography after local anesthesia. The Seldinger technique was used to insert a catheter into the right brachial vein or the right internal jugular vein. An occlusion balloon catheter of 6 F was guided in a branch of the hepatic veins, usually the median or right vein, under fluoroscopic control and continuous electrocardiographic and pressure monitoring.
  • After inflating the balloon at the catheter's tip (maximum diameter ranges from 8.5-11.5 mm), a venous check was performed to demonstrate complete vessel occlusion. The wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) was measured in this condition. Following that, the free hepatic vein pressure (FHVP) was measured after deflating the balloon at the catheter's tip. On a multi-channel recorder, a permanent trace was obtained. Pressures were also achieved in the inferior vena cava and the right atrium. According to the Baveno VI consensus, the HVPG-response was defined as a 20% or 12 mmHg reduction in HVPG after NSBB treatment.
  • HVPG= WHVP - FHVP (Normal is <5mm of Hg)

    • Ultrasonography of the abdomen:

  • dilated portal vein (>13 mm): non-specific
  • biphasic or reverse flow in portal vein (late stage): pathognomonic
  • recanalization of paraumbilical vein: pathognomonic
  • portal-systemic collateral pathways (collateral vessels/varices)
  • splenomegaly
  • ascites
  • The damping index (showing changes in the doppler hepatic vein waveform) corresponds with hemodynamically significant portal hypertension and HVPG values (together with HVPG changes after treatment)
  • splenic arterial resistive index

    • Liver and splenic stiffness:

  • A 3.5-MHz ultrasound transducer probe is mounted on the axis of a vibrator in the FibroScan device. Mild amplitude, low-frequency (50 Hz) vibrations are transmitted to the liver tissue, causing an elastic shear wave to propagate through the underlying tissue.If the success rate was greater than 60% and the interquartile range (IQR) was greater than 30% of the median value, LS values were accepted.
  • Guidelines for measuring SS is same as LS. SS was performed on a supine patient with maximal abduction of the left arm, with the probe positioned in an intercostal space where the spleen was correctly visualized by US. Furthermore, in accordance with the FibroScan's technical features, patients with a splenic parenchymal thickness of >4 cm under the probe were excluded.

    • Radiomics:

  • Convolutional neural network - Deep learning using liver and splenic channels for assessment of portal hypertension.
  • STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
  • Continuous variables are expressed as the median and categorical data as numbers (percentages) (range). For group comparison, use the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the 2 test for categorical variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to assess the linear relationship between noninvasive tests and HVPG (r). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be computed for each of the diagnostic parameters evaluated (age, transaminases, platelet count, spleen diameter, Plt/Spl, LS, SS, LSPS), as well as the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).For all tests, p≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analysis will be performed using SPSS .The analysis will be done with intention to treat and per protocol analysis if applicable.
  • Adverse effects:
  • 1. Major Sideeffects of Betablockers
  • Bradycardia,Heart block
  • Hyperglycaemia
  • Heart failure
  • Increase in airway resistance
  • Worsening lipid profile
  • Exacerbration of peripheral vascular disease

    2. HVPG related complications

  • Transient arrhythmias
  • Vagal reaction
  • Local access pain and bleeding
  • Stopping rule: Development of serious adverse effects leading to withdrawal of the drug or death from any cause.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

200

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, Inde, 110070
        • Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 70 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical / radiological /histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis (Child A&B)
  • Age >18 years
  • Advanced compensated liver disease of different etiology(Viral,metabolic,alcoholic)
  • Upper GI bleed
  • Valid consent
  • No history of NSBB use in last 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 70 years
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Underlaying shunts
  • Spleen anteroposterior diameter <4cm
  • Non cirrhotic portal hypertension
  • Only PHG, Ectopic varices
  • Heart rate <50bpm, SBP<100mm of Hg,Asthma, COPD, Aortic disease, atrioventricular block, Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Pregnancy
  • obese(BMI>30mm of Hg)
  • HIV
  • HCC / Other malignancy
  • Other Comorbidities: Chronic kidney disease [ CrCl< 30] Cirrhosis : Child C Stroke Cardiac failure, Uncontrolled diabetes(HbA1c >9)
  • AST/ALT >5 times
  • Drug allergies
  • ACLF
  • Narrow intercoastal space
  • Failure to give informed consent from family members.
  • Patient enrolled in other clinical study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Modèles d'observation: Cas uniquement
  • Perspectives temporelles: Éventuel

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Liver Cirrhosis
All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS.
Il s'agit d'une étude observationnelle

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Change in HVPG and its correlation with non-invasive methods.
Délai: 6 Weeks
6 Weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Assessment of severity of portal hypertension by non-invasive methods.
Délai: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Correlation and Cut-off values for non-invasive methods in responders and non-responders in relation to HVPG.
Délai: 6 weeks
Non invasive methods - LSM,SSM & LSPS
6 weeks
Correlation of Serological and radiological non invasive tests response in comparison with HVPG.
Délai: 6 weeks
AAR, APRI, FIB-4 index, CSPH risk score,fibrosis index, GPR, King's score, Lok score are other non- invasive tests.
6 weeks
Comparison of hypersplenism (Splenic volume and area) and hematological parameters before and after treatment.
Délai: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Diagnosis and response assessment by convolutional neural network- AI based model.
Délai: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Prognostic implication of HVPG rebleed on EVL+beta-blockers.
Délai: 6 weeks
6 weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Anticipé)

10 janvier 2022

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

10 octobre 2022

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

10 octobre 2022

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

8 octobre 2021

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 décembre 2021

Première publication (Réel)

21 décembre 2021

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

14 janvier 2022

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 décembre 2021

Dernière vérification

1 octobre 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • ILBS-Bleed-01

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Rechercher des essais similaires