Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Impact of Hyperemic State on Angio-IMR Performance

21 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Junbo Ge, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

The Impact of Hyperemic State on the Performance of Angiography Derived Indices in Assessing Coronary Microvascular Disease

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of angiography-derived microcirculatory indices (Angio-IMR) in assessing patients with stable angina or suspected coronary artery disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

How do the numerical values of Angio-IMR from five different software vendors change across three physiological states (resting, sub-hyperemia induced by nitroglycerin, and maximal hyperemia induced by adenosine)? Which physiological state and software algorithm provide the highest diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve, AUC) for diagnosing Coronary Microvascular Disease (CMD) when compared to the gold standard wire-based IMR? Researchers will compare the Angio-IMR results calculated under the three different physiological conditions within the same patient to see how the hyperemic state impacts the performance and consistency of these non-invasive indices.

Participants will:

Undergo standard-of-care coronary angiography and physiological assessment using a pressure wire for index of microvascular resistance (Wire-IMR) as part of their clinical management.

Have their angiographic images captured at three specific time points: at rest, after intracoronary nitroglycerin, and during adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia.

Allow their de-identified imaging and clinical data to be analyzed by an independent core laboratory using five different Angio-IMR software platforms to evaluate microvascular function.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Study Overview and Procedural Protocol

This is a prospective, multi-center, diagnostic accuracy study employing a self-controlled design. All participants will undergo coronary angiography and physiological assessment according to standard clinical indications. During the procedure, specific angiographic images will be systematically captured for the target vessel at three distinct physiological time points:

Resting State: Baseline coronary angiography without any hyperemic agents. Sub-hyperemic State: Following the intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin.

Maximal Hyperemic State: During continuous intracoronary infusion of adenosine to achieve maximal microvascular vasodilation.

Immediately following image acquisition, the reference standard measurement-Wire-IMR-will be performed using a pressure-sensor-equipped guidewire under maximal hyperemia.

Core Laboratory Imaging Analysis and Blinding

All angiographic data will be de-identified and transferred to a centralized, independent Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The analysis will be conducted as follows:

Software Platforms: Five different commercially available Angio-IMR software platforms (anonymized as A, B, C, D, and E) will be used to calculate microvascular resistance.

Independent Analysis: Five dedicated analysts, each specialized in one specific software platform, will perform the calculations. Each analyst will be blinded to the patients' clinical information, the Wire-IMR gold standard results, and the results from the other four software platforms.

Standardization: A primary researcher, not involved in the software measurements, will pre-define the target vessel segments and measurement frames to ensure consistency across all five software platforms.

Statistical Considerations and Data Management The study aims to determine if the coronary hyperemic state significantly alters the fluid dynamics modeling utilized by Angio-IMR algorithms. AUC will be calculated for each software at each of the three states. A head-to-head comparison of AUCs will be performed using DeLong's test. To maintain data integrity, results from the core laboratory and the clinical centers will remain strictly separated until the final database lock.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

192

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

      • Guangzhou, Chine
        • Recrutement
        • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
    • Please Select
      • Shanghai, Please Select, Chine, 200000
        • Recrutement
        • Zhongshan hospital, Fudan university
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon de probabilité

Population étudiée

The study population consists of adult patients (aged 18 and older) clinically diagnosed with stable angina or suspected coronary artery disease who are scheduled to undergo conventional coronary angiography and invasive physiological assessment.

Participants are prospectively and consecutively recruited from multiple clinical centers in China. The population specifically targets individuals with non-obstructive coronary arteries (stenosis < 50%) or those with moderate stenosis (50%-90%) but preserved epicardial flow (FFR > 0.80), where assessment of coronary microvascular function is clinically indicated to investigate the cause of ischemia.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable angina or suspected coronary heart disease.
  • Scheduled for coronary angiography and physiological assessment.
  • Target vessel with stenosis < 50% or 50%-90% with fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80.
  • Provided informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability (acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, severe arrhythmia).
  • Contraindications to angiography (e.g., end-stage renal disease).
  • Contraindications to adenosine (e.g., severe asthma, high-degree atrial-ventricular block).
  • Life expectancy < 1 year or pregnancy.
  • Target vessel unsuitable for wire operation (left main lesion, severe tortuosity) or stenosis > 90%.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Single cohort, self-controlled
Unlike the reference standard "Wire-IMR," which requires the advancement of a specialized pressure-sensor guidewire into the distal coronary artery, Angio-IMR is a wire-free technology. It derives microvascular resistance indices purely through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or specialized mathematical models based on standard coronary angiographic projections. This eliminates the risk of wire-induced vascular injury or spasm.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC)
Délai: Baseline
Comparison of AUC for 5 types of Angio-IMR against Wire-IMR (Gold standard, CMD defined as Wire-IMR ≥ 25) under three states.
Baseline

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Diagnostic Accuracy
Délai: Baseline
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value.
Baseline
Correlation
Délai: Baseline
Pearson/Spearman coefficients between Angio-IMR and Wire-IMR.
Baseline
Agreement
Délai: Baseline
Bland-Altman analysis (Bias and Limits of Agreement).
Baseline
Inter-vendor Agreement
Délai: Baseline
Consistency between different software brands.
Baseline

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Collaborateurs

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

4 mai 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 octobre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

11 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

29 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

29 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • B2026-265

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .