Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Development of an AI-Assisted Diagnostic Tool for Mycosis Fungoides and Other Cutaneous Lymphoproliferative Diseases Using Microscopic Image Analysis: A Training and Validation Study

14 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Kariman Mostafa Sayed Mansour, Cairo University

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPDs) are a group of skin disorders that range from benign conditions, such as pseudolymphomas, to malignant forms like cutaneous T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. Mycosis fungoides is the most common malignant type, but diagnosis is often difficult because many benign skin conditions can mimic lymphoma. Current diagnostic methods rely on microscopic examination of biopsies, which can be subjective and vary between pathologists.

This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning model that uses digitized biopsy images and clinical data to distinguish malignant CLPDs from benign ones. By applying artificial intelligence to dermatopathology, the project seeks to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce variability, and support clinicians in making timely treatment decisions. The novelty of this work lies in applying advanced AI methods to a rare and challenging group of skin diseases, with the potential to enhance patient care in both specialized centers and resource-limited settings.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Actif, ne recrute pas

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Cutaneous lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPDs) encompass both benign and malignant disorders, ranging from pseudolymphomas to cutaneous T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common malignant subtype, but diagnosis is often challenging because benign inflammatory conditions can closely mimic lymphoma. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard, yet interpretation is subjective and prone to inter-observer variability. This highlights the need for standardized diagnostic tools, including artificial intelligence (AI) solutions.

This study is a retrospective diagnostic accuracy investigation using routinely collected data. Archived hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides of patients with MF and other CLPDs will be retrieved from the Dermatopathology Unit at Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University. Slides of benign mimickers such as pseudolymphoma and pityriasis lichenoides will also be included. Cases with poor slide quality or insufficient data will be excluded.

Digitized images will be captured using both high-resolution microscope cameras and standardized smartphone devices to evaluate feasibility. Experienced dermatopathologists will annotate regions of interest, and relevant clinical data will be extracted to build a structured database. Deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), will be trained and validated on these datasets. Preprocessing techniques such as color normalization, stain separation, and data augmentation will be applied to enhance robustness.

The primary outcomes are diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the AI models in differentiating malignant from benign CLPDs, and in staging MF. Secondary outcomes include comparison with expert dermatopathologists, assessment of smartphone-based imaging, and evaluation across magnification levels. More than 500 slides collected over the past five years will be used, divided into training, validation, and testing sets.

By integrating AI into dermatopathology, this study aims to reduce diagnostic variability, improve accuracy, and explore novel imaging approaches. The work represents one of the first applications of deep learning to CLPDs, with potential to enhance patient care in both specialized centers and resource-limited healthcare settings.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

463

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Cairo, Egypte
        • Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

N/A

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Archived slides of patients diagnosed with malignant CLPDs (e.g., mycosis fungoides, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma) and benign mimickers (e.g., pseudolymphoma, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, PLEVA) were identified from the pathology database of Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals, Cairo University.

Cases were selected based on WHO-EORTC diagnostic criteria and availability of adequate quality H&E slides plus relevant clinical data.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Archived slides of patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of malignant CLPDs (e.g., mycosis fungoides at all stages, cutaneous B-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid papulosis), based on WHO-EORTC criteria.
  • Archived slides of patients with benign CLPDs that mimic MF clinically and histologically (e.g., pseudolymphoma, pityriasis lichenoides chronica, pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta [PLEVA]).
  • Availability of adequate quality hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides.
  • Availability of relevant clinical data (age, sex, disease duration, distribution of lesions, drug history).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Slides with significant artifacts (folding, tearing, poor staining) that prevent adequate image analysis.
  • Cases with insufficient clinical or pathological data for definitive diagnosis.
  • Cases with secondary cutaneous CLPDs

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
MF
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as mycosis fungoides

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

PLC/PLEVA
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as PLC or PLEVA

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

TCD
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as T cell dyscrasia

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

BCL
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as B cell lymphoma

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

Pseudolymphoma
Patients diagnosed histopathologically as pseudo lymphoma

Development and validation of a deep learning model using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and clinical data to differentiate malignant CLPDs from benign mimickers.

Comparator: Standard histopathological diagnosis by experienced dermatopathologists.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Diagnostic accuracy of AI model
Délai: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the trained AI models in differentiating benign CLPDs from malignant types.
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Comparison with dermatopathologists
Délai: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Compare AI model diagnostic accuracy with that of experienced dermatopathologists
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Smartphone imaging feasibility
Délai: Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).
Assess feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of AI models using smartphone-captured histopathology images.
Baseline (In retrospective diagnostic studies, the moment the AI evaluates the historical slide is considered the patients's baseline).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 janvier 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

30 novembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

30 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

15 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

15 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • MD-152-2025

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .