Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Data-Driven Lay First Responder Program in Cameroon (K-LFR Project)

5 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Sabrinah Christie

Implementation of a Data-Driven Pre-Hospital Lay First Responder Program in Cameroon

Cameroon experiences a high burden of injury-related morbidity and mortality and currently lacks a formal pre-hospital care system. Lay First Responder (LFR) programs have been implemented in several low-and middle-income countries to improve early injury care by training non-medical community members with high exposure to injury, such as commercial drivers, in basic first aid and safe transport of injured patients.

The study aims to implement and evaluate a data-driven, context-adapted LFR program in Cameroon using an implementation science approach. Quantitative trauma registry data and qualitative stakeholder interviews will be used to adapt the LFR curriculum to local injury patterns and care gaps. LFR program implementation will be associated with increased chances of survival on presentation and improved trauma outcomes.

The study is an interrupted time series evaluation of an LFR intervention where prehospital care rates and clinical patterns in the Cameroon Trauma Registry (CTR) patients at Limbe Regional hospital will be compared between historical pre-implementation controls and post-implementation of a data-driven lay first responder training program (the intervention).

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Injury accounts for a substantial proportion of preventable mortality in Cameroon, where no organized prehospital emergency medical system currently exists. Evidence suggests that effective prehospital care could prevent up to 45% of injury-related deaths. Lay First Responder (LFR) programs represent a pragmatic strategy for improving early trauma care in resource-limited settings by training lay persons who are frequently present at injury scenes.

Despite promising early results in other settings, rigorous evaluation of LFR programs has been limited, particularly regarding their impact on patient-level outcomes. This study aim to test the contextual feasibility of the lay first responder program in Cameroon, after it has been successful in other Sub-Saharan nations.

This study seeks to address these gaps by implementing a data-driven LFR program informed by trauma registry analysis and stakeholder engagement, and by evaluating feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness within Cameroonian context.

The Cameroon Trauma Registry (CTR) gathers prospective data on patient demographics, injury characteristics, receipt of prehospital care, clinical findings and management, disposition and outcomes on patients admitted for injuries at ten trauma hospitals in Cameroon. Each hospital has a full-time research assistant overseen by an MPH-level field supervisor. Patients are followed from presentation through hospital discharge. This study will be implemented in Limbe municipality, Cameroon and will utilize data from the Limbe Regional Hospital site of the CTR.

The LFR intervention: An LFR curriculum adapted for the Cameroon context using a two-stage, mixed-methods approach (quantitative analysis of prospective CTR data and qualitative semi-structured interviews of target stakeholders) will be used to train LFR providers (commercial drivers and community members) over a 3-month training and transition period.

The primary metric of program feasibility will be percent change in the proportion of trauma patients receiving prehospital care in the post-intervention cohort compared to pre-intervention historical controls. The secondary outcomes for program effectiveness will be injury severity-stratified percentage change in the proportion of CTR patients presenting with normal vital signs (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate) in the post-intervention cohort compared to the pre-intervention cohort.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

1812

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Southwest
      • Limbe, Southwest, Cameroun
        • Limbe Health District
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Trauma patients presenting to Limbe Regional Hospital and enrolled in the Cameroon Trauma Registry

Exclusion Criteria

- Trauma patients not included in the Cameroon trauma registry at Limbe regional hospital.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation séquentielle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Pre-LFR implementation CTR cohort
Historic data of trauma patients enrolled during an 18-month pre-implementation period in Limbe Regional Hospital before the LFR training program commences.
Expérimental: Post-LFR implementation CTR cohort
Trauma patients enrolled in the 18- month post-implementation period in Limbe Regional Hospital after the 3-month LFR provider training program and transition period has ended.
Training of LFR providers using a data driven, pretested curriculum adapted for the Cameroon context over a 3-month training and transition period.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Prehospital care rate
Délai: From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
Proportion of hospitalized trauma patients who received prehospital care prior to arrival at participating hospitals, compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Systolic blood pressure at presentation
Délai: From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
Median systolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured at hospital presentation among injured patients, compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts
From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
Respiratory rate greater than 8 and less than 20 breaths per minute
Délai: From enrollment through the 18-month post-implementation period
Percentage change in the proportion of CTR patients presenting with respiratory rate greater than 8 and less than 20 breaths per minute compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through the 18-month post-implementation period
Proportion of trauma patients with heart rate between 60 and 100 beats per minute
Délai: From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
Percent change in the proportion of trauma patients with heart rate between 60 and 100 beats per minute compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
In-hospital mortality
Délai: From enrollment through the 18-month post-implementation period.
All-cause in-hospital mortality among injured patients, compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through the 18-month post-implementation period.
24-hour mortality
Délai: From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
All-cause mortality within 24 hours of hospital presentation among injured patients, compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through the 18-month post implementation period.
Blood transfusion
Délai: From enrollment through 18-month post implementation period.
Proportion of injured patients receiving blood transfusion during hospitalization, compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through 18-month post implementation period.
Operative intervention
Délai: From enrollment through 18-month post implementation period.
Proportion of injured patients requiring surgical intervention during hospitalization, compared between pre- and post implementation LFR cohorts.
From enrollment through 18-month post implementation period.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 juin 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

15 avril 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

12 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

12 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • K01TW012689 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Traumatisme

Essais cliniques sur Lay First Responder (LFR) training

S'abonner