Rehab-let: touchscreen tablet for self-training impaired dexterity post stroke: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Debbie Rand, Gabi Zeilig, Rachel Kizony, Debbie Rand, Gabi Zeilig, Rachel Kizony

Abstract

Background: Impaired dexterity of the weaker upper extremity is common post stroke and it is recommended that these individuals practice many repetitions of movement to regain function. However, stroke rehabilitation methods do not achieve the required intensity to be effective. Touchscreen tablet technology may be used as a motivating tool for self-training impaired dexterity of the weaker upper extremity post stroke.

Methods/design: Rehab-let is a self-training protocol utilizing game apps on a touchscreen for practicing movement of the weaker upper extremity. We will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess Rehab-let compared to traditional self-training to improve dexterity of the weaker hand, and to increase self-training time and satisfaction in individuals with subacute stroke. Forty individuals with stroke undergoing subacute rehabilitation will be randomly allocated to Rehab-let or a traditional self-training program using therapeutic aids such as balls, blocks and pegs. All participants will be requested to perform self-training for 60 minutes a day, 5 times a week for 4 weeks. Dexterity assessed by The Nine Hole Peg Test is the main outcome measure. Assessments will be administered pre and post the self-training intervention by assessors blind to the group allocation.

Discussion: The outcomes of this study will inform the design of a fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Rehab-let. If found to be effective, Rehab-let can be used during subacute rehabilitation to increase treatment intensity and improve dexterity. Potentially, Rehab-let can also be used after discharge and might be ideal for individuals with mild stroke who are often not referred to formal rehabilitation.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials NCT02136433 registered on 17 September 2014.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow design

References

    1. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1983;46:521–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.6.521.
    1. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJH. The long term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:357–64. doi: 10.1080/096382899297459.
    1. Nudo RJ. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke. 2007;38:840–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000247943.12887.d2.
    1. Liepert J, Baunder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.6.1210.
    1. Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:3–10. doi: 10.1097/01.NPT.0000260568.31746.34.
    1. Kaur G, English C, Hillier S. How physically active are people with stroke in therapy sessions aimed at improving motor function? A systematic review. Stroke Res Treatment. 2012
    1. Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I, Collier J. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:43–8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0013.
    1. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40:2123–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544585.
    1. Barker RN. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1213–23. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075717.
    1. Rahmani E, Boren SA. Videogames and health improvement: a literature review of randomized controlled trials. Games for Health J ResDev Clin Applications. 2012;1:5.
    1. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:52–61. doi: 10.1310/tsr1402-52.
    1. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41:1477–84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584979.
    1. Rand D, Givon N, Weingarden H, Nota A, Zeilig G. Eliciting upper extremity purposeful movements using video games: a comparison with traditional therapy for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:733–9. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521008.
    1. Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84. doi: 10.1177/1545968311408918.
    1. Rand D, Eng JJ. Predicting daily use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:274–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.039.
    1. Barnard Y, Bradley MD, Hodgson F, Lloyd AD. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:1715–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006.
    1. Zhong B. From smartphones to iPad: power users’ disposition toward mobile media devices. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:1742–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.016.
    1. White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, Pollack M. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor's perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;0:1–7.
    1. Rand D, Schejter-Margalit T, Dudkiewicz I, Kizony R, Zeilig G. The use of the iPad for poststroke hand rehabilitation; a pilot study. Virtual rehabilitation (ICVR) Philadelphia, PA, USA: Proceeding at 10th International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation; 2013. pp. 109–113.
    1. Saposnik G, Chow CM, Gladstone D, Cheung D, Brawer E, Thorpe KE, et al. iHOME Research Team for the Stroke Outcomes Research Canada Working Group. iPad technology for home rehabilitation after stroke (iHOME): a proof-of-concept randomized trial. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:956–62. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12328.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
    1. Connell LA, McMahon NE, Harris JE, Watkins CL, Eng JJ. A formative evaluation of the implementation of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation intervention in clinical practice: a qualitative interview study. Implement Sci. 2014;9:90. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0090-3.
    1. Oxford GK. Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:570–3. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.570.
    1. Croarkin E. Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke. Phys Ther. 2004;84:62–74.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am] 1884;9:6–22.
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
    1. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–92. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001.
    1. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227–36. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130405.
    1. Brooke J. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL, editors. Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor & Francis; 1995. pp. 189–94.
    1. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
    1. Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:435–40. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331146.
    1. Nysa GM, Zandvoor MJ, Kort PL. Jansen B, deHann EH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Cognitive Dis acute stroke: Prevalence Clin Determinants Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23:408–16.
    1. Rothwell PM, Coull AJ, Giles MF, et al. Change in stroke incidence, mortality, case-fatality, severity, and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford vascular study) Lancet. 2004;363:1925–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16405-2.
    1. Dennis MS, Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, et al. A comparison of risk factors and prognosis for transient ischemic attacks and minor ischemic strokes: the Oxfordshire community stroke project. Stroke. 1989;20:1494–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.11.1494.
    1. Carlsson G, Moller A, Blomstrand C. A qualitative study of the consequences of “hidden dysfunctions” one year after a mild stroke in persons < 75 years. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1373–80. doi: 10.1080/09638280400000211.
    1. Edwards DF, Hahn M, Baum C, et al. The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;15:151–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.04.001.
    1. Duncan P, Samsa G, Weinberger M, et al. Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:740–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.4.740.
    1. Hoffmann TC, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel