Using Tablets for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Post Acquired Brain Injury (TBL)

September 17, 2014 updated by: Sheba Medical Center
The purpose of the study is to test the effectiveness of training using novel tablet applications for hand function, compared to traditional hand exercises. In addition, we aim to examine brain plasticity following treatment with the new tablet applications. We hypothesize that training with a tablet would prove to be more effective than traditional exercises. We expect to observe neuroplastic changes in the brain in patients who practiced finger movements using the tablet.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ramat Gan, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Sheba Medical Center
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rachel Kizony, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least one week post Brain injury or stroke
  • Partial ability to open and close their hand (fingers)
  • Full function of the hands prior to the injury or event
  • Intact or Corrected vision
  • Cognitively intact or mild impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other neurological conditions besides the brain injury or stroke
  • Orthopedic conditions of the upper extremity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Tablet - self exercise

Existing tablet Apps that encourage finger movement in a fun manner while playing a game will be used. The apps will be taught to the participants and then they will be requested to exercise alone (or with family) everyday for one hour in addition to their regular rehabilitation sessions (Occupational, Physical Therapy, speech).

The intervention will include 15-20 sessions of 60 minutes of self-training using a tablet.

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: GRASP self exercise

GRASP (Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program)(Harris et al., 2009)is an arm and hand exercise program developed for individuals with stroke with upper extremity impairments GRASP provides a method for patients to undertake a self-directed arm and hand exercise program.

The exercises will be taught to the participants and then they will be requested to exercise alone (or with family) everyday for one hour in addition to their regular rehabilitation sessions (Occupational, Physical Therapy, speech).

The intervention will include 15-20 sessions of 60 minutes of self-training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in score of the Nine Hole Peg Test
Time Frame: An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
To assess dexterity of the affected hand. This test is a assesses dexterity and the time to remove and return nine pegs is measured. The Nine Hole Peg Test is a reliable, valid and responsive measure in clients with stroke
An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment
Time Frame: An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
To quantify the level of the motor impairment. The participants are required to perform different movements. Each movement is rated 0 (inability to perform) to 2 (full movement). The total score ranges from 0 (no active movements) to 60 points (full movements).
An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
Grip and pinch strength
Time Frame: An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
Assessed by the Jamar dynamometer. This is a valid and reliable way to assess grip and pinch strength of individuals recovering from stroke.
An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
Quantifies the perceived level of pain intensity on a scale of 0-10 cm.
An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
The System Usability Scale
Time Frame: An average of one week after intervention
This questionnaire includes 10 items which provide a global view of subjective assessment of a system's usability.
An average of one week after intervention
Change from baseline in score of the Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
Assesses the functional ability of the upper extremity by grasping and moving objects of different size and weight. It has four subtests; grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement. The total score is out of 57 points.
An average of one week before intervention and one week after intervention
Self - report compliance
Time Frame: An average of one week after intervention
Mean self-training time per day.
An average of one week after intervention
Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: An average of one week after intervention
Developed for the study and will query how much the subjects were satisfied with the self-training intervention they experienced and to what extent they think it can help them to improve their upper extremity function. Responses will be rated on a scale of 1-5.
An average of one week after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rachel Kizony, PhD, Sheba

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Tablet - self exercise

Subscribe