New predictive model for microsurgical outcome of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: study protocol

Xianzeng Tong, Jun Wu, Yong Cao, Yuanli Zhao, Shuo Wang, Xianzeng Tong, Jun Wu, Yong Cao, Yuanli Zhao, Shuo Wang

Abstract

Introduction: Although microsurgical resection is currently the first-line treatment modality for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), microsurgery of these lesions is complicated due to the fact that they are very heterogeneous vascular anomalies. The Spetzler-Martin grading system and the supplementary grading system have demonstrated excellent performances in predicting the risk of AVM surgery. However, there are currently no predictive models based on multimodal MRI techniques. The purpose of this study is to propose a predictive model based on multimodal MRI techniques to assess the microsurgical risk of intracranial AVMs.

Methods and analysis: The study consists of 2 parts: the first part is to conduct a single-centre retrospective analysis of 201 eligible patients to create a predictive model of AVM surgery based on multimodal functional MRIs (fMRIs); the second part is to validate the efficacy of the predictive model in a prospective multicentre cohort study of 400 eligible patients. Patient characteristics, AVM features and multimodal fMRI data will be collected. The functional status at pretreatment and 6 months after surgery will be analysed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The patients in each part of this study will be dichotomised into 2 groups: those with improved or unchanged functional status (a decreased or unchanged mRS 6 months after surgery) and those with worsened functional status (an increased mRS). The first part will determine the risk factors of worsened functional status after surgery and create a predictive model. The second part will validate the predictive model and then a new AVM grading system will be proposed.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol and informed consent form have been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University (KY2016-031-01). The results of this study will be disseminated through printed media.

Trial registration number: NCT02868008.

Keywords: functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); inctracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs); microsurgery; predictive model.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of the study protocol.

References

    1. Abecassis IJ, Xu DS, Batjer HH et al. . Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2014;37:E7. 10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14250
    1. ApSimon HT, Reef H, Phadke RV et al. . A population-based study of brain arteriovenous malformation: long-term treatment outcomes. Stroke 2002;33:2794–800. 10.1161/01.STR.0000043674.99741.9B
    1. Ondra SL, Troupp H, George ED et al. . The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg 1990;73:387–91. 10.3171/jns.1990.73.3.0387
    1. Stapf C, Mast H, Sciacca RR et al. . Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 2006;66:1350–5. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000210524.68507.87
    1. Tong X, Wu J, Lin F et al. . Risk factors for subsequent hemorrhage in patients with cerebellar arteriovenous malformations. World Neurosurg 2016;92:47–57. 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.082
    1. Al-Shahi R, Bhattacharya JJ, Currie DG et al. . Prospective, population-based detection of intracranial vascular malformations in adults: the Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS). Stroke 2003;34:1163–9. 10.1161/01.STR.0000069018.90456.C9
    1. Andreussi L, Dhellemmes P. [Cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Natural history. Therapeutic approaches]. Agressologie 1990;31:237–9.
    1. Niazi TN, Klimo P Jr, Anderson RC et al. . Diagnosis and management of arteriovenous malformations in children. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010;21:443–56. 10.1016/j.nec.2010.03.012
    1. Yamada S, Brauer FS, Colohan AR et al. . Concept of arteriovenous malformation compartments and surgical management. Neurol Res 2004;26:288–300. 10.1179/016164104225013987
    1. Kim H, McCulloch CE, Johnston SC et al. . Comparison of 2 approaches for determining the natural history risk of brain arteriovenous malformation rupture. Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:1317–22. 10.1093/aje/kwq082
    1. Bendok BR, El Tecle NE, El Ahmadieh TY et al. . Advances and innovations in brain arteriovenous malformation surgery. Neurosurgery 2014;(74 Suppl 1):S60–73. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000230
    1. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83. 10.3171/jns.1986.65.4.0476
    1. Lawton MT, Kim H, McCulloch CE et al. . A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery 2010;66:702–13. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367555.16733.E1
    1. Baumann SB, Noll DC, Kondziolka DS et al. . Comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging with positron emission tomography and magnetoencephalography to identify the motor cortex in a patient with an arteriovenous malformation. J Image Guid Surg 1995;1:191–7. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-712X(1995)1:4<191::AID-IGS1>;2-5
    1. Stapleton SR, Kiriakopoulos E, Mikulis D et al. . Combined utility of functional MRI, cortical mapping, and frameless stereotaxy in the resection of lesions in eloquent areas of brain in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:68–82. 10.1159/000121167
    1. Lazar RM, Marshall RS, Pile-Spellman J et al. . Interhemispheric transfer of language in patients with left frontal cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1325–32. 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00054-3
    1. Seghier M, Lazeyras F, Momjian S et al. . Language representation in a patient with a dominant right hemisphere: fMRI evidence for an intrahemispheric reorganisation. Neuroreport 2001;12:2785–90. 10.1097/00001756-200109170-00007
    1. Ozdoba C, Nirkko AC, Remonda L et al. . Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations involving the motor pathways. Neuroradiology 2002;44:1–10. 10.1007/s002340100664
    1. Cannestra AF, Pouratian N, Forage J et al. . Functional magnetic resonance imaging and optical imaging for dominant-hemisphere perisylvian arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2004;55:804–12; discussion 12-4. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000137654.27826.71
    1. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Morris IT et al. . Functional MRI near vascular anomalies: comparison of cavernoma and arteriovenous malformation. J Clin Neurosci 2004;11:845–8. 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.10.016
    1. Ulmer JL, Hacein-Bey L, Mathews VP et al. . Lesion-induced pseudo-dominance at functional magnetic resonance imaging: implications for preoperative assessments. Neurosurgery 2004;55:569–79; discussion 80-1. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000134384.94749.B2
    1. Stancanello J, Cavedon C, Francescon P et al. . BOLD fMRI integration into radiosurgery treatment planning of cerebral vascular malformations. Med Phys 2007;34:1176–84. 10.1118/1.2710326
    1. Caramia F, Francia A, Mainero C et al. . Neurophysiological and functional MRI evidence of reorganization of cortical motor areas in cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:1360–9. 10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.029
    1. Lee L, Sitoh YY, Ng I et al. . Cortical reorganization of motor functional areas in cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:649–53. 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.07.007
    1. Jiao Y, Lin F, Wu J et al. . Lesion-to-eloquent fibre distance is a crucial risk factor for pre-surgical evaluation of arteriovenous malformations in temporo-occipital junctions. World Neurosurg 2016;93:355–64. 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.059
    1. Lin F, Zhao B, Wu J et al. . Risk factors for worsened muscle strength after the surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations of the eloquent motor area. J Neurosurg 2016;125:289–98. 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15969
    1. Lin F, Wu J, Zhao B et al. . Preoperative functional findings and surgical outcomes in patients with motor cortical arteriovenous malformation. World Neurosurg 2016;85:273–81. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.002
    1. Tong X, Wu J, Lin F et al. . Visual field preservation in surgery of occipital arteriovenous malformations: a prospective study. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1423–36. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.069
    1. Zhao B, Cao Y, Zhao Y et al. . Functional MRI-guided microsurgery of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2014;4:e006618 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006618
    1. Henriksson L, Raninen A, Näsänen R et al. . Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2007;78:74–81. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.099374
    1. Sanjuán A, Bustamante JC, Forn C et al. . Comparison of 2 fMRI tasks for the evaluation of the expressive language function. Neuroradiology 2010;52:407–15. 10.1007/s00234-010-0667-8
    1. Lin F, Jiao Y, Wu J et al. . Effect of functional MRI-guided navigation on surgical outcomes: a prospective controlled trial in patients with arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2016;1:1–10. 10.3171/2016.4.JNS1616
    1. Lin F, Wu J, Wang L et al. . Surgical treatment of cavernous malformations involving the posterior limb of the internal capsule: utility and predictive value of preoperative diffusion tensor imaging. World Neurosurg 2016;88:538–47. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.074
    1. Spetzler RF, Ponce FA. A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;114:842–9. 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10663
    1. Kim H, Abla AA, Nelson J et al. . Validation of the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system for brain arteriovenous malformations in a multicenter cohort of 1009 surgical patients. Neurosurgery 2015;76:25–31. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000556

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel