Multimodal Imaging Techniques in Assessing the Surgical Risk for Eloquent Arteriovenous Malformations (MITASREAVM)

August 13, 2016 updated by: Dr. Yong Cao, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

The Efficacy of Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Assessing the Surgical Risk for Eloquent Arteriovenous Malformations

Microsurgical resection for eloquent arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains challenging. Currently, there are only two grading systems concerning pretreatment assessment of brain AVMs: the Spetzler-Martin grading system proposed by Spetzler and Martin in 1986 and the supplementary grading system proposed by Lawton in 2010. Controversies exist regarding the treatment timing and treatment modalities for eloquent AVMs. Till now, there is no clinical trial concerning the efficacy of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging techniques in assessing the surgical risk for eloquent AVMs. The investigators assume that multimodal imaging-based grading system is superior to the classic Spetzler-Martin grading system and the supplementary grading system in predicting the surgical risk for eloquent AVMs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Microsurgical resection for eloquent arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains challenging. Currently, there are only two grading systems concerning pretreatment assessment of brain AVMs: the Spetzler-Martin grading system proposed by Spetzler and Martin in 1986 and the supplementary grading system proposed by Lawton in 2010. Controversies exist regarding the treatment timing and treatment modalities for eloquent AVMs. Till now, there is no clinical trial concerning the efficacy of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging techniques in assessing the surgical risk for eloquent AVMs. The investigators assume that multimodal imaging-based grading system is superior to the classic Spetzler-Martin grading system and the supplementary grading system in predicting the surgical risk for eloquent AVMs.

This study consists of two parts: a retrospective analysis and a prospective study. Firstly, the investigators will retrospectively review the 250 AVM patients that were surgically treated at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between June 2012 and June 2015. All data of these patients were prospectively maintained in our AVM database. All these patients had preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. The investigators will collect the patient demographic data, AVM features, the least distances from the AVMs to the activated cortex as well as to the fiber tracts. The investigators will also collect the patient preoperative functional status (modified Rankin scale score, mRS) and the functional status (mRS) six months after surgery. The changes between the two functional status in mRS will be classified into two groups: those with worsened mRS (mRS score six months after surgery - presurgical mRS score >0) and those with unchanged or improved mRS (mRS score six months after surgery - presurgical mRS score ≤0). The new grading system will be proposed based on the multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The investigators will compare the predictive accuracy of the three grading systems (the Spetzler-Martin grading system, the supplementary system and our new grading system) in assessing functional status (worsened mRS). Then in the prospective study, the investigators will enroll 400 surgically treated AVM patients from five neurosurgical centers. All patients will meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The preoperative preparation, the surgical procedures, the follow-up period, the primary outcomes and statistical analyses will be the same as those in the retrospective study part. Multimodal imaging-based system will be verified in this prospective phase. If the results demonstrate that the multimodal MRI-based grading system is superior to the Spetzler-Martin grading system and the supplementary system in predicting the functional status six months after AVM surgery, the investigators will propose the new AVM grading system in the public.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shuo Wang, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged between 12 and 60 years
  2. Data from preoperative structural MRI, blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD)-fMRI, time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA), and DTI of the motor tract,language tract or optic radiation were available
  3. Patients with a definite diagnosis of AVM confirmed by preoperative digital subtraction angiography
  4. Patients opting for surgical management at the five centers in this study
  5. Patients without any interventional therapy (microsurgery, radiosurgery, endovascular embolization, or multimodality treatment) before admission to the five centers

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with acute intracranial hematoma and resultant brain hernia prompting emergency surgery
  2. Patients with a hemorrhagic incident in the past month
  3. Nonavailability of BOLD-fMRI and DTI data
  4. Patients with other severe diseases that prevented them from having surgery
  5. Patients unwilling to participate in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: fMRI guided AVM resection
fMRI guided microsurgical resection of brain AVMs
fMRI guided microsurgical resection of brain AVMs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
neurologic status measured by modified Rankin scale score
Time Frame: six months after AVM surgery
the changes of modified Rankin scale (mRS) score six months after AVM surgery compared with the presurgical mRS score
six months after AVM surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of patient deaths
Time Frame: within 6 months after surgery
number of patient deaths due to AVM rebleeding or surgery
within 6 months after surgery
AVM obliteration confirmed by postoperative DSA or CTA
Time Frame: within one week after surgery
AVM obliteration on DSA or CTA
within one week after surgery
AVM rebleeding confirmed by CT scan
Time Frame: within 6 months after surgery
AVM rebleeding confirmed by CT scan within 6 months after surgery
within 6 months after surgery
Seizure control measured by Engel classification
Time Frame: within 6 months after surgery
Seizure control or new seizure onset according to Engel classification within 6 months after surgery
within 6 months after surgery
muscle strength measured by muscle strength grading scale
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
muscle strength according to muscle strength grading scale 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery
number of patients with aphasia
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
number of patients with aphasia measured by Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery
number of patients with visual field defect
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
number of patients with visual field defect measured by visual field testing 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Shuo Wang, M.D., Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations

Clinical Trials on Microsurgical resection of brain AVMs

3
Subscribe