Effects on obese women of the sugar sucrose added to the diet over 28 d: a quasi-randomised, single-blind, controlled trial

Marie Reid, Richard Hammersley, Maresa Duffy, Carrie Ballantyne, Marie Reid, Richard Hammersley, Maresa Duffy, Carrie Ballantyne

Abstract

To investigate whether obese women can compensate for sucrose added to the diet when it is given blind, rather than gaining weight or exhibiting dysfunctional regulation of intake, in the present study, forty-one healthy obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m²) women (age 20-50 years), not currently dieting, were randomly assigned to consume sucrose (n 20) or aspartame (n 21) drinks over 4 weeks in a parallel single-blind design. Over the 4 weeks, one group consumed 4 × 250 ml sucrose drinks (total 1800 kJ/d) and the other group consumed 4 × 250 ml aspartame drinks. During the baseline week and experimental weeks, body weight and other biometric data were measured and steps per day, food intake using 7 d unweighed food diaries, and mood using ten- or seven-point Likert scales four times a day were recorded. At the end of the experiment, the participants weighed 1·72 (SE 0·47) kg less than the value predicted by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) model; the predicted body weight accounted for 94·3% of the variance in the observed body weight and experimental group accounted for a further 1·1% of the variance in the observed body weight, showing that women consuming sucrose drinks gained significantly less weight than predicted. The reported daily energy intake did not increase significantly, and sucrose supplements significantly reduced the reported voluntary sugar, starch and fat intake compared with aspartame. There were no effects on appetite or mood. Over 4 weeks, as part of everyday eating, sucrose given blind in soft drinks was partially compensated for by obese women, as in previous experiments with healthy and overweight participants.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01799096.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Predicted body weight (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) model) and observed weight at the end of the experiment. Drinks given over 28 d: , sucrose; , aspartame. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Predicted body weight (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) model) and observed weight at the end of the three experiments with healthy-weight, overweight and obese participants. Drinks given over 28 d: , sucrose; , aspartame. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

References

    1. Morenga LT, Mallard S & Mann J (2013) Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. Br Med J 346, e7492
    1. Houchins JA, Burgess JR, Campbell WW, et al. (2012) Beverage vs. solid fruits and vegetables: effects on energy intake and body weight. Obesity 20, 1844–1850
    1. Cassady BA, Considine RV & Mattes RD (2012) Beverage consumption, appetite, and energy intake: what did you expect? Am J Clin Nutr 95, 587–593
    1. Reid M, Hammersley R, Hill AJ, et al. (2007) Long-term dietary compensation for added sugar: effects of supplementary sucrose drinks over a 4-week period. Br J Nutr 97, 193–203
    1. Reid M, Hammersley R & Duffy M (2010) Effects of sucrose drinks on macronutrient intake, body weight, and mood state in overweight women over 4 weeks. Appetite 55, 130–136
    1. Johnson F, Pratt M & Wardle J (2012) Dietary restraint and self-regulation in eating behavior. Int J Obes 36, 665–674
    1. Carels R, Cacciapaglia H, Rydin S, et al. (2006) Can social desirability interfere with success in a behavioral weight loss program? Psychol Health 21, 65–78
    1. Prentice AM, Black AE, Murgatroyd PR, et al. (1989) Metabolism or appetite questions of energy balance with particular reference to obesity. J Hum Nutr Diet 2, 95–104
    1. Beck A (1996) Beck Depression Inventory II. San Antiono, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc
    1. British Soft Drinks Association (2013) Refreshing the Nation: The 2013 UK Soft Drinks Report. London: British Soft Drinks Association
    1. Duffey KJ, Huybrechts I, Mouratidou T, et al. (2012) Beverage consumption among European adolescents in the HELENA study. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 244–252
    1. Tudor-Locke C & Bassett D (2004) How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 34, 1–8
    1. Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, et al. (2011) Obesity 3. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 378, 826–837
    1. Nelson M, Atkinson M & Meyer JA (1997) Photographic Atlas of Food Portion Sizes. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    1. Brown I, Thompson J, Tod A, et al. (2006) Primary care support for tackling obesity: a qualitative study of the perceptions of obese patients. Br J Gen Pract 56, 666–672
    1. Roese NJ & Jamieson DW (1993) 20 years of bogus pipeline research – a critical-review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull, 114, 363–375
    1. Carels RA, Darby LA, Rydin S, et al. (2005) The relationship between self-monitoring, outcome expectancies, difficulties with eating and exercise, and physical activity and weight loss treatment outcomes. Ann Behav Med 30, 182–190
    1. Carroll NC & Young AW (2005) Priming of emotion recognition. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A Hum Exp Psychol 58, 1173–1197
    1. Dennis EA, Flack KD & Davy BM (2009) Beverage consumption and adult weight management: a review. Eat Behav 10, 237–246
    1. Dolan LC, Potter SM & Burdock GA (2010) Evidence-based review on the effect of normal dietary consumption of fructose on blood lipids and body weight of overweight and obese individuals. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 50, 889–918
    1. Brown MA, Goldstein-Shirley J, Robinson J, et al. (2001) The effects of a multi-modal intervention trial of light, exercise, and vitamins on women's mood. Women Health 34, 93–112
    1. Reid M, Bunting J & Hammersley R (2005) Relationships between the food expectancy questionnaire (FEQ) and the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Appetite 45, 127–136
    1. Davies JB (1997) The Myth of Addiction. London: Psychology Press
    1. Lustig RH, Schmidt LA & Brindis CD (2012) The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 482, 27–29
    1. Dufty WF (1975) Sugar Blues. Radnor, PA: Chilton

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel