Population Pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analyses of Phase I and II Clinical Trials

Ben Klünder, Mohamed-Eslam F Mohamed, Ahmed A Othman, Ben Klünder, Mohamed-Eslam F Mohamed, Ahmed A Othman

Abstract

Background and objectives: Upadacitinib is a janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor being developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. This work characterized upadacitinib population pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and RA patients and the effects of covariates on upadacitinib exposure.

Methods: Upadacitinib plasma concentrations (n = 6399) from 107 healthy subjects and 466 RA patients from three phase I and two 12-week RA phase IIb trials (1-48 mg immediate-release doses across studies) were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. The models were qualified using bootstrap and stochastic simulations.

Results: A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination described upadacitinib pharmacokinetics. Estimates (95% bootstrap confidence interval) for upadacitinib oral clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, absorption lag time, and mean absorption time were 39.7 (37.8-41.5) L/h, 210 (196-231) L, 0.48 (0.47-0.49) h, and 0.08 (0.04-0.12) h, respectively, for a typical healthy male. Matching on other covariates, a 16 and 32% higher upadacitinib area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was estimated for females relative to males, and for subjects with RA relative to healthy volunteers, respectively. Subjects with RA with mild or moderate renal impairment were estimated to have 16 and 32% higher upadacitinib AUC, respectively, compared with subjects with RA with normal renal function. Upadacitinib clearance was not correlated with body weight.

Conclusions: Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics follow dose-proportional, bi-exponential disposition. A slightly lower upadacitinib clearance is estimated in subjects with RA than in healthy volunteers, consistent with observations for other JAK inhibitors. Other covariates (weight, sex, mild or moderate renal impairment) are not associated with clinically relevant effects on upadacitinib exposure.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01741493" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT01741493, NCT02066389, and NCT01960855.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

The studies were sponsored by AbbVie. AbbVie contributed to the study design, research, and interpretation of data, and the writing, review, and approval of the publication. Medical writing support was provided by Therese Stickler under contract with AbbVie.

Conflict of interest

Drs. Klünder, Mohamed, and Othman are employees and shareholders of AbbVie.

Ethical approval

The studies were conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocols and informed consent forms were approved by the Institutional Review Board at each site.

Informed consent

All participants provided written informed consent before any study-related procedures were performed.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Individual and population-predicted upadacitinib concentration versus observed upadacitinib concentration
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conditional weighted residuals versus time since last dose and versus population-predicted upadacitinib concentration
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Visual predicted check for observed and model-simulated upadacitinib plasma concentrations versus time since last dose for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, stratified by dose. The solid red line represents the median observed plasma concentration, and the shaded red area represents a simulation-based 95% confidence interval for the median. The observed 5 and 95% percentiles are presented with dashed red lines, and the 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding model-predicted percentiles are shown as shaded blue areas
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effect of covariates on upadacitinib exposures in rheumatoid arthritis patients (mean ratio and 90% confidence interval). Reference groups for the ratios presented: males (reference for females), body weight ≥ 60 kg and ≤ 100 kg (for body weight effect), and CrCL ≥ 90 mL/min (for CrCL effect). CrCL creatinine clearance, Cmax maximum concentration, AUC area under the concentration–time curve

References

    1. Firestein GS. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2003;423(6937):356–361. doi: 10.1038/nature01661.
    1. Wilkie WS, Schwieterman P. Strategies for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Orthopedics. 2012;35(2):125–130. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-36.
    1. Nakayamada S, Kubo S, Iwata S, Tanaka Y. Recent progress in JAK inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. BioDrugs. 2016;30(5):407–419. doi: 10.1007/s40259-016-0190-5.
    1. Norman P. Selective JAK inhibitors in development for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23(8):1067–1077. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2014.918604.
    1. AbbVie. A study comparing ABT-494 to placebo and to adalimumab in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis who are on a stable dose of methotrexate and who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-COMPARE). identifier NCT02629159. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study comparing ABT-494 to placebo in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis on a stable dose of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) who have an inadequate response to csDMARDs alone (SELECT-NEXT). identifier NCT02675426. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study to compare ABT-494 to placebo in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis on stable dose of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) who have an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic DMARDs (SELECT-BEYOND). identifier NCT02706847. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study to compare ABT-494 monotherapy to methotrexate monotherapy in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have not previously taken methotrexate (SELECT-EARLY). identifier NCT02706873. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study comparing ABT-494 monotherapy to methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to MTX (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY). identifier NCT02706951. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A phase 3 study to compare ABT-494 to abatacept in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis on stable dose of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) who have an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic DMARDs (SELECT-CHOICE). Identifier NCT03086343. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study comparing ABT-494 to placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who have a history of inadequate response to at least one biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (SELECT-PsA 2). identifier NCT03104374. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study comparing ABT-494 to placebo and to adalimumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis who have an inadequate response to at least one non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (SELECT-PsA 1). identifier NCT03104400. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ABT-494 for the induction of symptomatic and endoscopic remission in subjects with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease who have inadequately responded to or are intolerant to anti-TNF therapy (Celest Study). identifier NCT02365649. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study to evaluate ABT-494 in adult subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. identifier NCT02925117. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. AbbVie. A study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ABT-494 for induction and maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. identifier NCT02819635. . Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
    1. Mohamed MF, Camp HS, Jiang P, Padley RJ, Asatryan A, Othman AA. Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ABT-494, a Novel selective JAK 1 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(12):1547–1558. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0419-y.
    1. Kremer JM, Emery P, Camp HS, Friedman A, Wang L, Othman AA, et al. A phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(12):2867–2877. doi: 10.1002/art.39801.
    1. Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Burmester GR, Meerwein S, Camp HS, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a Selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in a phase IIb study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(12):2857–2866. doi: 10.1002/art.39808.
    1. Sheiner LB, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetics/dynamics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992;32:185–209. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.001153.
    1. Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28(5):481–504. doi: 10.1023/A:1012299115260.
    1. Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13(2):143–151. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9255-z.
    1. Petersson KJ, Hanze E, Savic RM, Karlsson MO. Semiparametric distributions with estimated shape parameters. Pharm Res. 2009;26(9):2174–2185. doi: 10.1007/s11095-009-9931-1.
    1. Mohamed MF, Jungerwirth S, Asatryan A, Jiang P, Othman AA. Assessment of effect of CYP3A Inhibition, CYP Induction, OATP1B Inhibition, and high-fat meal on pharmacokinetics of the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(10):2242–2248. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13329.
    1. US FDA . Clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics review(s)—tofacitinib. Silver Spring: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2011.
    1. Namour F, Diderichsen PM, Cox E, Vayssiere B, Van der Aa A, Tasset C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of filgotinib (GLPG0634), a selective JAK1 Inhibitor, in support of phase IIB dose selection. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(8):859–874. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0240-z.
    1. Dickmann LJ, Patel SK, Rock DA, Wienkers LC, Slatter JG. Effects of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and an anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody on drug-metabolizing enzymes in human hepatocyte culture. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39(8):1415–1422. doi: 10.1124/dmd.111.038679.
    1. Xu Y, Hijazi Y, Wolf A, Wu B, Sun YN, Zhu M. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to assess the influence of blinatumomab-mediated cytokine elevations on cytochrome P450 enzyme activity. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2015;4(9):507–515. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12003.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel