Effectiveness of the Mobility Rehab System for Mobility Training in Older Adults: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Rodrigo Vitório, Mahmoud El-Gohary, Sean Pearson, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, Graham Harker, Fay B Horak, Jodi Lapidus, Mike Studer, Martina Mancini, Rodrigo Vitório, Mahmoud El-Gohary, Sean Pearson, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, Graham Harker, Fay B Horak, Jodi Lapidus, Mike Studer, Martina Mancini

Abstract

Introduction: Mobility impairments are among the main causes of falls in older adults and patients with neurological diseases, leading to functional dependence and substantial health care costs. Feedback-based interventions applied in controlled, laboratory environments have shown promising results for mobility rehabilitation, enhancing the benefits of standard therapy. However, the effectiveness of sensor-based feedback to improve gait in actual outpatient physical therapy settings is unknown. The proposed trial examines the effectiveness of a physical therapist-assisted, visual feedback system using wearable inertial sensors, Mobility Rehab, for mobility training in older adults with gait disturbances in an outpatient clinic. Methods: The study is a single site, pragmatic clinical trial in older adults with gait disturbances. Two hundred patients undergoing their outpatient rehabilitation program are assigned, by an independent assistant, for screening by one of four therapists, and assigned to either a standard physical therapy or therapist-assisted feedback therapy. Both groups train twice a week for 6 weeks. Four physical therapists were randomized and stratified by years of experience to deliver standard therapy or therapist-assisted feedback rehabilitation. Each session is 45 min long. Gait is trained for 30 min. The additional 15 min include exercises for endurance, strength, and static and dynamic balance in functional tasks. Mobility Rehab uses unobtrusive, inertial sensors on the feet and belt with real-time algorithms to provide real-time feedback on gait metrics (i.e., gait speed, double support time, foot clearance, angle at foot strike, and arm swing), which are displayed on a hand-held monitor. Blinded assessments are carried out before and after the intervention. The primary outcome measure is subjects' perception of balance as measured by the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. Gait speed, as measured with wearable inertial sensors during walking, is the secondary outcome measure. Discussion: We hypothesize that therapist-assisted feedback rehabilitation will be more effective than standard rehabilitation for gait. Feedback of motor performance plays a crucial role in rehabilitation and objective characterization of gait impairments by Mobility Rehab has the potential to improve the accuracy of patient-specific gait feedback. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03869879.

Keywords: balance; biofeedback; gait; mobility; rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

FBH and ME-G are employees of APDM Wearable Technologies-an ERT company, a company that may have a commercial interest in the results of this research and technology. This potential conflict has been reviewed and managed by OHSU. In addition, SP was employed by APDM Wearable Technologies-an ERT company. FBH also consults with Autobahn, Biogen, Pfizer, Medtronic, Neuropore, Sanofi, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Vitório, El-Gohary, Pearson, Carlson-Kuhta, Harker, Horak, Lapidus, Studer and Mancini.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SPIRIT template for the schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photograph of a patient using Mobility Rehab with a PT during a therapy session.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mobility Rehab interface and visualization of gait metrics while walking. Example of biofeedback visualization of arm range of motion while walking. Bars indicate left and right arm range of motion during straight walking (blue) and 180° turns (orange).

References

    1. Azadian E, Torbati HR, Kakhki AR, Farahpour N. The effect of dual task and executive training on pattern of gait in older adults with balance impairment: a Randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2016) 62:83–9. 10.1016/j.archger.2015.10.001
    1. Guzik A, Druzbicki M, Wolan-Nieroda A. Assessment of two gait training models: conventional physical therapy and treadmill exercise, in terms of their effectiveness after stroke. Hippokratia. (2018) 22:51–9.
    1. Jung KS, Bang H, In TS, Cho HY. Gait training with auditory feedback improves trunk control, muscle activation and dynamic balance in patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. (2019) 33:1–6. 10.3233/BMR-170852
    1. Lura DJ, Venglar MC, van Duijn AJ, Csavina KR. Body weight supported treadmill vs. overground gait training for acute stroke gait rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. (2019) 42:270–4. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000357
    1. Salzman B. Gait and balance disorders in older adults. Am Fam Physician. (2010) 82:61–8.
    1. Schulz BW. A new measure of trip risk integrating minimum foot clearance and dynamic stability across the swing phase of gait. J Biomech. (2017) 55:107–12. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.024
    1. Ashburn A, Stack E, Ballinger C, Fazakarley L, Fitton C. The circumstances of falls among people with Parkinson's disease and the use of Falls Diaries to facilitate reporting. Disabil Rehabil. (2008) 30:1205–12. 10.1080/09638280701828930
    1. Hamacher D, Singh NB, Van Dieen JH, Heller MO, Taylor WR. Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review. J R Soc Interface. (2011) 8:1682–98. 10.1098/rsif.2011.0416
    1. Bloem BR, Gussekloo J, Lagaay AM, Remarque EJ, Haan J, Westendorp RG. Idiopathic senile gait disorders are signs of subclinical disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2000) 48:1098–101. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04786.x
    1. Verghese J, LeValley A, Hall CB, Katz MJ, Ambrose AF, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of gait disorders in community-residing older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2006) 54:255–61. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00580.x
    1. Jankovic J. Gait disorders. Neurol Clin. (2015) 33:249–68. 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.09.007
    1. Callis N. Falls prevention: identification of predictive fall risk factors. Appl Nurs Res. (2016) 29:53–8. 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.05.007
    1. Chang JT, Ganz DA. Quality indicators for falls and mobility problems in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2007) 55:S327–34. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01339.x
    1. Byl N, Zhang W, Coo S, Tomizuka M. Clinical impact of gait training enhanced with visual kinematic biofeedback: patients with Parkinson's disease and patients stable post stroke. Neuropsychologia. (2015) 79:332–43. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.020
    1. Lim SB, Horslen BC, Davis JR, Allum JH, Carpenter MG. Benefits of multi-session balance and gait training with multi-modal biofeedback in healthy older adults. Gait Posture. (2016) 47:10–7. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.03.017
    1. Mirelman A, Rochester L, Maidan I, Del Din S, Alcock L, Nieuwhof F, et al. . Addition of a non-immersive virtual reality component to treadmill training to reduce fall risk in older adults (V-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2016) 388:1170–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31325-3
    1. van der Logt RP, Findling O, Rust H, Yaldizli O, Allum JH. The effect of vibrotactile biofeedback of trunk sway on balance control in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2016) 8:58–63. 10.1016/j.msard.2016.05.003
    1. Gordt K, Gerhardy T, Najafi B, Schwenk M. Effects of wearable sensor-based balance and gait training on balance, gait, and functional performance in healthy and patient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gerontology. (2018) 64:74–89. 10.1159/000481454
    1. Watt JR, Franz JR, Jackson K, Dicharry J, Riley PO, Kerrigan DC. A three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Biomech. (2010) 25:444–9. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.002
    1. Yang F, King GA. Dynamic gait stability of treadmill versus overground walking in young adults. Journal Electromyograph Kinesiol. (2016) 31:81–7. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.09.004
    1. Zijlstra A, Mancini M, Chiari L, Zijlstra W. Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2010) 7:58. 10.1186/1743-0003-7-58
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. (2013) 158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Myers AM, Fletcher PC, Myers AH, Sherk W. Discriminative and evaluative properties of the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (1998) 53:M287–94. 10.1093/gerona/53A.4.M287
    1. Powell LE, Myers AM. The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (1995) 50A:M28–34. 10.1093/gerona/50A.1.M28
    1. Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: “walking speed: the sixth vital sign”. J Geriatr Phys Therapy. (2009) 32:46–9. 10.1519/00139143-200932020-00002
    1. Mancini M, King L, Salarian A, Holmstrom L, McNames J, Horak FB. Mobility lab to assess balance and gait with synchronized body-worn sensors. J Bioeng Biomed Sci. (2011)12:007. 10.4172/2155-9538.S1-007
    1. Marchetti GF, Lin CC, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. Responsiveness and minimal detectable change of the dynamic gait index and functional gait index in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. J Neurol Phys Therapy. (2014) 38:119–24. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000015
    1. Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. (2004) 2:204–8. 10.1370/afm.141
    1. Hass CJ, Bishop M, Moscovich M, Stegemoller EL, Skinner J, Malaty IA, et al. . Defining the clinically meaningful difference in gait speed in persons with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Therapy. (2014) 38:233–8. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000055

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel