Mobility Rehab, a Therapist-assisted System for Gait Rehabilitation

May 8, 2020 updated by: Martina Mancini, Oregon Health and Science University

Mobility Rehab: A Feedback System for Mobility Rehabilitation for Older Adults

Phase II of this study includes a pragmatic clinical trial which will take place at Northwest Rehabilitation Associates (NWRA) in Salem, OR to verify the efficacy of the system in a physical therapy clinic.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This Phase II project is a collaboration among: 1) APDM, an innovative small business that has successfully commercialized several innovative products to quantify human movement; 2) the Balance Disorders Laboratory in the department of Neurology at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU); and 3) NorthWest Rehabilitation Associates (NWRA), a nationally-recognized outpatient rehabilitation center that will test the effectiveness of Mobility Rehab for adults with mobility disturbances.

The objective of this Phase II application is to prepare the Mobility Rehab system for commercialization and demonstrate its efficacy for mobility training. Our hypothesis is that feedback-based rehabilitation will be more effective than standard rehabilitation for gait in older adults with gait disturbances. In this Phase II, we will use a pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Mobility Rehab on 300 patients with various types of gait disturbances in a physical therapy clinic. In addition to visual feedback, the system will be optimized in Phase II to also provide verbal feedback commands for patients during training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Salem, Oregon, United States, 97302
        • Recruiting
        • Northwest Rehabilitation Associate
        • Contact:
          • Mike Studer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 60-89 years old
  • gait disturbances requiring physical therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to follow instructions (up to the practitioner's judgement)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Feedback-assisted physical therapy
During a visual feedback session, therapists will spend 30min per session using the Mobility Rehab system for gait training with patients. Therapists may select modality, overground walking and/or treadmill, tasks (dual task, head turns, etc. as above) as appropriate for each patient. They will additionally spend 15min on endurance, strength, and static and dynamic balance in functional tasks.
The system uses unobtrusive, wearable, inertial sensors with real-time algorithms to provide real-time feedback on: step time asymmetry, foot clearance, arm swing, trunk lateral range, and foot strike angle during gait.
Placebo Comparator: Traditional physical therapy
During a regular session, patients with gait impairment will work on gait with the following tasks for 30min: weights on ankles, dual tasks, UE support, partial body weight support, speed challenges, obstacles, and head turning. Therapists may select modality, overground walking and/or treadmill, tasks (dual task, head turns, etc. as above) as appropriate for each patient. They will additionally spend 15min on endurance, strength, and static and dynamic balance in functional tasks.
Therapists will treat these patients with traditional therapeutic modalities and practices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
Time Frame: Collected at a participant's baseline visit and final study visit, after an average of one month
This questionnaire measures an individual's perception of their own balance. Individuals use a scale ranging from 0% to 100% in rating the amount of confidence they have in their balance during 16 hypothetical daily-life activities. A score of 100% would represent one being fully confident in their balance during a specific task, while a score of 0% would represent one having no confidence at all in their balance. Total score ranges from 0 to 1600.
Collected at a participant's baseline visit and final study visit, after an average of one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: Collected at a participant's baseline visit and final study visit, after an average of one month
Gait speed is measured through two instrumented, two-minute walks. The first walk is performed at the individual's casual walking pace and the second is performed at a pace the individual considers to be faster than their casual pace.
Collected at a participant's baseline visit and final study visit, after an average of one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martina Mancini, PhD, Oregon Health and Science University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

At the conclusion of the study raw data of motor tasks will be available, within the bounds allowed by HIPAA and institutional privacy policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

At the conclusion of the project.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Email study PI for IPD access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Feedback-assisted physical therapy

3
Subscribe