Effects of C8 nerve root block during interscalene brachial plexus block on anesthesia of the posterior shoulder in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomized parallel-group controlled trial

Eugene Kim, Chang Hyuk Choi, Jong Hae Kim, Eugene Kim, Chang Hyuk Choi, Jong Hae Kim

Abstract

Background: A classical approach to produce interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) consistently spares the posterior aspect of the shoulder and ulnar sides of the elbow, forearm, and hand, which are innervated by the lower trunk of the brachial plexus (C8-T1). As an alternative to the classical approach, a caudal approach to ISBPB successfully produces anesthesia of the ulnar sides of the elbow, forearm, and hand. However, its beneficial effects on anesthesia in the posterior aspect of the shoulder have not been investigated. In addition, the C8 nerve root is not routinely selectively blocked during ISBPB. Therefore, we will compare the C5 to C7 and C5 to C8 nerve root blocks during a caudal approach to ISBPB to assess the clinical benefit of C8 nerve blocks for the surgical anesthesia of the posterior aspect of the shoulder.

Methods/design: In this prospective parallel-group single-blind randomized controlled trial, 74 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery under ISBPB are randomly allocated to receive the C5 to C7 or C5 to C8 nerve root block at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is pain intensity, which is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), or 2 (severe pain), during the introduction of a posterior portal into the glenohumeral joint. The secondary outcomes are (1) the extent of the ipsilateral sensory, motor, hemidiaphragmatic, and stellate ganglion blockade, (2) changes in the results of a pulmonary function test, (3) incidence of complications related to ISBPB, (4) postoperative numerical pain rating scale scores, (5) patients' satisfaction with the ISBPB, (6) dose and frequency of analgesic use, and (7) incidence of conversion to general anesthesia.

Discussion: This study is the first to evaluate the beneficial effects of the C8 nerve root block during ISBPB, which has rarely been performed due to the technical challenge in visualizing and blocking the C8 nerve root. It is expected that a C8 nerve root block performed during ISBPB will provide sufficient surgical anesthesia of the posterior aspect of the shoulder, which cannot be achieved by a classical approach to ISBPB.

Trial registration: ClicnicalTrials.gov, NCT03487874 . Registered on 4 April 2018.

Keywords: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery; Cervical nerve root; Interscalene brachial plexus block; Lower trunk of the brachial plexus.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The SPIRIT flow diagram: the schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments. t1 is before the placement of the interscalene brachial plexus block. t2 is when the interscalene brachial plexus block is placed. t3 is 30 min after the placement of the interscalene brachial plexus block. t4 is during surgery. t5 is on admission to the postanesthetic care unit. t6 is on discharge from the postanesthetic care unit. t7 is between 6 and 12 h after surgery. t8 is 24 h after surgery. * Forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity. † Including worst numerical pain rating score.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow chart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ultrasound-guided C5 to C8 nerve root block for interscalene brachial plexus block. a The C5 to C8 nerve roots located between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. The C8 nerve root lies on the first rib, and the C5 and C6 nerve roots are fused into the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. b Spread of local anesthetic around the C8 nerve root. c The separated C5 and C6 nerve roots visualized by the oblique rotation of the medial side of the ultrasonography transducer. d Spread of local anesthetic around the C5 and C6 nerve roots

References

    1. Winnie AP. Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:455–466. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197005000-00029.
    1. Ryu T, Kil BT, Kim JH. Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1726. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001726.
    1. Kim BG, Han JU, Song JH, Yang C, Lee BW, Baek JS. A comparison of ultrasound-guided interscalene and supraclavicular blocks for post-operative analgesia after shoulder surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:427–435. doi: 10.1111/aas.12864.
    1. Shin SW, Byeon GJ, Yoon JU, Ok YM, Baek SH, Kim KH, et al. Effective analgesia with ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Anesth. 2014;28:64–69. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1681-x.
    1. Winnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z, Radonjic R. Interscalene cervical plexus block: a single-injection technic. Anesth Analg. 1975;54:370–375.
    1. Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ, Franco CD, et al. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:134–170. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819624eb.
    1. Al-Kaisy A, McGuire G, Chan VW, Bruin G, Peng P, Miniaci A, et al. Analgesic effect of interscalene block using low-dose bupivacaine for outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:469–473. doi: 10.1097/00115550-199823050-00007.
    1. Gadsden JC, Tsai T, Iwata T, Somasundarum L, Robards C, Hadzic A. Low interscalene block provides reliable anesthesia for surgery at or about the elbow. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.031.
    1. Kim JH, Chen J, Bennett H, Lesser JB, Resta-Flarer F, Barczewska-Hillel A, et al. A low approach to interscalene brachial plexus block results in more distal spread of sensory-motor coverage compared to the conventional approach. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:987–989. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820b5e8e.
    1. Ip VH, Tsui BC. Lower interscalene approach for elbow surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:600–601. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9913-y.
    1. Bharti N, Bhardawaj N, Wig J. Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular and below-C6 interscalene brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery: a randomised, observer-blinded study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;43:468–472. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300408.
    1. Bloc S, Rontes O, Mercadal L, Delbos A. Low approach to interscalene brachial plexus block: safer under ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1282. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318230409a.
    1. Kapral S, Greher M, Huber G, Willschke H, Kettner S, Kdolsky R, et al. Ultrasonographic guidance improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:253–258. doi: 10.1097/00115550-200805000-00010.
    1. Demondion X, Herbinet P, Boutry N, Fontaine C, Francke JP, Cotten A. Sonographic mapping of the normal brachial plexus. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1303–1309.
    1. Sheppard DG, Iyer RB, Fenstermacher MJ. Brachial plexus: demonstration at US. Radiology. 1998;208:402–406. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680567.
    1. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Santacroce E, Pugliese F, Graif M, Derchi LE. Brachial plexus sonography: a technique for assessing the root level. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:699–702. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790699.
    1. Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization) Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6:103–109. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103.
    1. Kapur E, Vuckovic I, Dilberovic F, Zaciragic A, Cosovic E, Divanovic KA, et al. Neurologic and histologic outcome after intraneural injections of lidocaine in canine sciatic nerves. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:101–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01169.x.
    1. Liguori GA, Kahn RL, Gordon J, Gordon MA, Urban MK. The use of metoprolol and glycopyrrolate to prevent hypotensive/bradycardic events during shoulder arthroscopy in the sitting position under interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:1320–1325.
    1. Keegan JJ, Garrett FD. The segmental distribution of the cutaneous nerves in the limbs of man. Anat Rec. 1948;102:409–437. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091020403.
    1. Gerscovich EO, Cronan M, McGahan JP, Jain K, Jones CD, McDonald C. Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:597–604. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.597.
    1. Petrar SD, Seltenrich ME, Head SJ, Schwarz SK. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:133–138. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000215.
    1. Yoo YJ, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Efficacy of digital pupillometry for diagnosis of Horner syndrome. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178361.
    1. Stockman A, Sharpe LT. Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006;26:225–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00325.x.
    1. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF. Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993;16:5–40. doi: 10.1183/09041950.005s1693.
    1. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–338. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.
    1. Zhang Z. Univariate description and bivariate statistical inference: the first step delving into data. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:91. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.02.11.
    1. Kanagalingam S, Miller NR. Horner syndrome: clinical perspectives. Eye Brain. 2015;7:35–46.
    1. Foerster O. The dermatomes in man. Brain. 1933;56:1–39. doi: 10.1093/brain/56.1.1.
    1. Lee MW, McPhee RW, Stringer MD. An evidence-based approach to human dermatomes. Clin Anat. 2008;21:363–373. doi: 10.1002/ca.20636.
    1. Burckett-St Laurent D, Chan V, Chin KJ. Refining the ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block: the superior trunk approach. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61:1098–1102. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0237-3.
    1. Greenberg SA. The history of dermatome mapping. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:126–131. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.1.126.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel