- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03487874
Efficacy of the C8 Nerve Root Block During Interscalene Block for Anesthesia of the Posterior Aspect of the Shoulder
August 8, 2019 updated by: JongHae Kim, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Efficacy of the 8th Cervical Nerve Root Block During Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
This study evaluates the effects of selective 8th cervical nerve root block during interscalene brachial plexus block on the relief of pain intensity upon the introduction of a posterior portal during arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
The 5th to 7th cervical nerve roots will be blocked in half of participants, while the 5th to 8th cervical nerve roots will be blocked in the other half.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
By blocking only the 5th to 7th cervical nerve blocks, conventional interscalene brachial plexus block spares the 8th cervical and 1st thoracic dermatomes which innervate the posterior aspect of the shoulder.
To visualize the shoulder joint space during shoulder arthroscopic surgery, the introduction of a posterior portal is essential.
However, conventional interscalene brachial plexus block cannot effectively relieve the pain caused by its insertion due to sparing of the 8th cervical and 1st thoracic dermatomes.
The addition of the 8th cervical nerve root block to conventional interscalene brachial plexus block decreases pain intensity upon the introduction of a posterior portal.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
74
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 42472
- Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2
- Arthroscopic shoulder surgery under interscalene brachial plexus block
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal
- Contralateral hemidiaphragmatic paralysis or paresis
- Contralateral vocal cord palsy
- Severe pulmonary restrictive disease
- Coagulopathy
- Allergy to local anesthetics or history of allergic shock
- Difficulty communicating with medical personnel
- Peripheral neuropathy or neurologic sequelae on the operative limb
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Interscalene block with C8 root block
The 5th to 8th cervical nerve root block under ultrasound guidance using 25 to 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine
|
Under ultrasound guidance, the 5th to 8th cervical nerve roots are blocked.
Placement of 25 to 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around the cervical nerve roots
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Conventional interscalene block
The 5th to 7th cervical nerve root block under ultrasound guidance using 25 to 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine
|
Placement of 25 to 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine around the cervical nerve roots
Other Names:
Under ultrasound guidance, the 5th to 7th cervical nerve roots are blocked.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity upon the introduction of a posterior portal
Time Frame: 50 minutes after interscalene block
|
0, 1, and 2 represent no pain, mild pain, and severe pain, respectively.
|
50 minutes after interscalene block
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sensory blockade
Time Frame: 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
C5 to T1 dermatomal blockade graded from 0 to 2 (0 = no cold sensation, 1 = reduced cold sensation, and 2 = normal cold sensation) by applying ice to the shoulder
|
30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Motor blockade
Time Frame: 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Motor blockade of the radial, ulnar, median, musculocutaneous, and axillary nerves graded from 0 to 2 (0 = complete block, 1 = partial block, and 2 = no block)
|
30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic blockade
Time Frame: Before interscalene block and 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Extent of a reduction in the amplitude of excursion of the diaphragm on the vertical axis of the M-mode wave under M-mode ultrasound evaluation
|
Before interscalene block and 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Horner's syndrome
Time Frame: Before interscalene block and 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
The extent of a reduction in the ipsilateral pupil size measured by a pupillometer Presence or absence of ptosis
|
Before interscalene block and 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: Before interscalene block and 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity before and 30 minutes after the end of local anesthetic injection
|
Before interscalene block and 30 minutes after interscalene block
|
Complications related with interscalene block
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Presence or absence of vascular puncture, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax, and paresthesia
|
24 hours
|
Numerical pain rating score at admission to postanesthetic care unit
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Numerical pain rating score ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) at admission to postanesthetic care unit
|
5 minutes
|
Numerical pain rating score at discharge from postanesthetic care unit
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Numerical pain rating score ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) at discharge from postanesthetic care unit
|
30 minutes
|
Numerical pain rating score between 6 and 12 hours after surgery
Time Frame: 6 and 12 hours
|
Numerical pain rating score ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) between 6 and 12 hours after surgery
|
6 and 12 hours
|
Numerical pain rating score 24 hours after surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Numerical pain rating score ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) 24 hours after surgery
|
24 hours
|
Worst numerical pain rating score
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Worst numerical pain rating score ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) during 24 hours after surgery
|
24 hours
|
Postoperative hour when pain starts to be felt
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Time at regression of anesthesia which starts to cause postoperative pain during 24 hours after surgery
|
24 hours
|
Patient's satisfaction about surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Likert scale consisting of "very dissatisfied", "dissatisfied", "unsure", "satisfied", and "very satisfied"
|
24 hours
|
Dose of postoperative analgesic use
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Cumulative dose of analgesic required for postoperative analgesia during 24 hours after surgery
|
24 hours
|
Frequency of postoperative analgesic use
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Frequency of analgesic use during 24 hours after surgery
|
24 hours
|
Dose of intraoperative analgesic use
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Cumulative dose of analgesic to supplement incomplete surgical anesthesia
|
2 hours
|
Frequency of intraoperative analgesic use
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Frequency of analgesic use to supplement incomplete surgical anesthesia
|
2 hours
|
Conversion into general anesthesia
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Number of patients whose regional anesthesia is converted into general anesthesia due to incomplete surgical anesthesia provided by the regional anesthesia
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jong Hae Kim, MD, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 4, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 8, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
August 9, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 28, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
April 4, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 12, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 8, 2019
Last Verified
August 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR-18-018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain
-
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesRecruitingShoulder Injuries | Shoulder Capsulitis | Shoulder Arthritis | Shoulder Impingement | Shoulder Bursitis | Shoulder Pain ChronicPakistan
-
University of Southern DenmarkRegion of Southern Denmark; The Danish Rheumatism Association; Esbjerg Municipality and other collaboratorsCompletedHypermobility Syndrome Shoulder | Shoulder Pain Chronic | Shoulder LuxationDenmark
-
Şeyhmus KAPLANCompletedSubacromial Impingement | Pain, Shoulder
-
Oslo University HospitalUnknownShoulder Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Shoulder PainNorway
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Istanbul Aydın UniversityCompletedPain, Shoulder | Myofacial Pain | Adhesion; ShoulderTurkey
-
Mohamed R El TahanCompletedUnilateral Chronic Shoulder Pain | Bilateral Chronic Shoulder PainEgypt
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityHacettepe UniversityCompletedShoulder Pain | Shoulder Injury | Shoulder ImpingementTurkey
-
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesCompletedShoulder Injuries | Shoulder Pain | Shoulder Capsulitis | Frozen Shoulder | Shoulder ImpingementPakistan
-
Makassed General HospitalRecruiting
-
Zagazig UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Interscalene block with C8 root block
-
Larissa University HospitalUnknownBradycardia | Hypotension | Shoulder Surgery | Autonomic Nervous System | Interscalene Block | Beach Chair PositionGreece
-
JongHae KimResearch Institute of Medical Science, Daegu Catholic UniversityRecruitingOximetry | Brachial Plexus BlockKorea, Republic of
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonTerminated
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompletedDisorder of Rotator CuffCanada
-
Henan Provincial People's HospitalNot yet recruitingPain After Shoulder Surgery
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiActive, not recruitingPain | Shoulder InjuryUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedShoulder Arthroplasty | Ultrasound GuidedTurkey
-
University of AarhusPrivate Hospital MoelholmRecruitingHerniated Disc | Radiculopathy Lumbar | Stenosis, Spinal | Foraminal Stenosis | Radiculopathy SacralDenmark
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisCompleted