- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT01760200
Drug Eluting Balloon Versus Drug Eluting Stent in PCI
Drug Eluting Balloon Versus Drug Eluting Stent in Coronary Artery Disease PCI: Insights From a Meta-analysis of 1462 Patients
Drug eluting balloons (DEB) have been developed to overcome the limitations of drug eluting stent (DES), but clinical results of different studies about DEB are not consistent.
Thus, we planned a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of DEB and DES in coronary artery disease (CAD).
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Descrizione dettagliata
Drug eluting balloons (DEB) have been developed to overcome the limitations of drug eluting stent (DES), but clinical results of different studies about DEB are not consistent. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of DEB and DES in coronary artery disease (CAD).
The meta-analysis was performed according to the recommended methods [14-15]. A systematic search for eligible studies involved MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, Highwire Press, Scopus and Google Scholar databases and was conducted without language restriction by two independent investigators (A.L. and A.R.), using the following keywords: "drug", "eluting" "balloon(s)", "DEB", "coronary", "angioplasty". Divergences were resolved by consensus. Endnote software v. 10 was used to build up libraries of results that were combined after erasing duplicates. The references of retrieved studies were searched manually for additional trials, and efforts to contact authors were performed to obtain further study details or additional references. The search is updated to December 2012.
Selection criteria: citations were screened at title and abstract level and retrieved as full reports.
- Inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized studies or cohort studies reporting a comparison between a DEB treated group and a DES treated group; 2) availability of reports of late lumen loss (LLL) and/or overall death and/or myocardial infarction (MI) and/or stent thrombosis (ST) and/or target lesion revascularization (TLR).
- Exclusion criteria were: 1) duplicate reporting (in which case the manuscript reporting the largest sample or the longest follow-up was selected), 2) follow up of at least 6 months; 3) studies presenting composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) without mentioning individual end points. Data were abstracted on pre-specified forms by 2 unblinded reviewers; divergences were resolved by consensus.
Internal validity : the present meta-analysis was performed according to the Guidelines for randomized controlled trials of the Cochrane Collaboration and for non randomized studies in compliance with the Guidelines of the MOOSE group. Quality of included studies was appraised by 2 unblinded investigators. The risk of selection, performance, detection, and attrition bias (expressed as low risk of bias [A], moderate risk of bias [B], high risk of bias [C], or incomplete reporting leading to inability to ensure the underlying risk of bias [D]) were evaluated separately, as recommended. Non-randomized studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale a validated technique in assessing the quality of non-randomized studies.
Data analysis and synthesis: Odds ratios (ORs) were computed from individual studies and pooled according to a fixed effect (e.g. inverse variance weighting) or random effect model in case of statistical heterogeneity. Two separate subgroup analysis were pre-specified: 1) exclusion of studies with small vessel and bifurcation PCI; 2) exclusion of non-randomized studies 3) exclusion of studies in which DEBs were not used together with BMS deployment.
Results will be presented as overall meta-analysis and subgroups meta-analyses for DEB vs DES comparisons. Outcomes appraised were in-stent LLL, overall death, MI, ST and TLR. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method for combining ORs, a validated method to pool the data in a meta-analysis of binary outcomes. For the in-stent LLL outcome, the mean difference of 6-month LLL compared with baseline was used and the overall weighted mean difference (WMD) was built with the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test, with 2-tailed p=0.1. Statistical inconsistency test (I2) was also employed to overcome the low statistical power of Cochran's Q test. The potential publication bias was examined by constructing a "funnel plot", in which sample size was plotted against odds ratios. In addition, a mathematical estimate of the asymmetry of this plot was provided by a linear regression approach. Asymmetry was considered to be present if the intercept of the regression line did deviate significantly from zero. To explore and mitigate heterogeneity, pre-specified covariates (prevalence of diabetes in the study population and reference coronary vessel diameter) as potential confounders were considered in the meta-regression analysis.
Pooling of data, subgroup analyses and publication bias tests were performed with Review Manager 5.1 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, Købehvn, Denmark) and StatsDirect v 2.7.8 (StatsDirect Ltd, Cheshire WA, UK). Meta-regression analyses were builded with Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2 (Biostat, Englewood, New Jersey, United States).
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Piedmont
-
Novara, Piedmont, Italia, 28100
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Metodo di campionamento
Popolazione di studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- randomized studies or cohort studies reporting a comparison between a DEB treated group and a DES treated group
- availability of reports of late lumen loss (LLL) and/or overall death and/or myocardial infarction (MI) and/or stent thrombosis (ST) and/or target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Exclusion Criteria:
- duplicate reporting (in which case the manuscript reporting the largest sample or the longest follow-up was selected)
- follow up of at least 1 year
- studies presenting composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) without mentioning individual end points.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / Coorte |
---|
Drug eluting balloon angioplasty
|
Drug eluting stent group
Drug eluting stent intervention
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Overall mortality
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
|
mortality rate from all cause
|
1 year
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Myocardial infarction rates
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
|
Myocardial infarction rates
|
1 year
|
Target vessel revascularization
Lasso di tempo: 1 year
|
symptoms or ischemia driven new revascularization of the coronary artery already treated with DEB at baseline
|
1 year
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Stima)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 0000003
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Disfunsione dell'arteria coronaria
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterCompletatoSoggetti consecutivi che sono idonei per una coronaria | Angioplastica di de Novo Lesion(s) in Native Coronary | Le arterie dovrebbero essere sottoposte a screening per l'idoneità. | Un numero totale di 200 pazienti che soddisfano la selezione | Criteri e disponibilità a firmare il consenso... e altre condizioniIsraele