- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT01800968
Functional Impact of GLP-1 for Heart Failure Treatment (FIGHT) (FIGHT)
Functional Impact of GLP-1 for Heart Failure Treatment
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Hospitalization for AHFS identifies individuals at increased risk of death and re-hospitalization following discharge. This increased risk justifies intervention with novel therapy during the vulnerable post-discharge period to enhance clinical stability and prevent early HF mortality and readmissions.
As heart failure (HF) progresses, impairments in metabolism render the heart substrate constrained, limiting cardiac metabolism. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a naturally occurring incretin peptide that enhances cellular glucose uptake by stimulating insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in target tissues. Preclinical and early-phase clinical data support GLP-1 as an effective therapy for advanced HF while use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in large numbers of patients with diabetes reveal a good safety profile and reductions in adverse cardiac outcomes.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Fase 2
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Delaware
-
Newark, Delaware, Stati Uniti, 19718
- Christiana Care Health Services
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, Stati Uniti, 30322
- Emory University School of Medicine
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Stati Uniti, 60611
- Northwestern University
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
Boston, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
Boston, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti, 02111
- Tufts Medical Center
-
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti, 02132
- Boston VA Healtcare System
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, Stati Uniti, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Missouri
-
St. Louis, Missouri, Stati Uniti, 63110
- Washington University
-
St. Louis, Missouri, Stati Uniti, 63117
- Saint Louis University Hospital
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 27705
- Duke University
-
Lumberton, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 28538
- Southeast Regional Medical Center
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44109
- Metro Health System
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44106
- University Hospitals- Case Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 17603
- Lancaster Heart and Stroke Foundation
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 19107
- Jefferson Medical College
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 19140
- Temple University Hospital
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 19104
- University of Pennsylvaina
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, Stati Uniti, 77030
- Michael DeBakey VA Medical Center
-
-
Utah
-
Murray, Utah, Stati Uniti, 84157
- Intermountain Medical Center
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, Stati Uniti, 84132
- University of Utah School of Medicine
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, Stati Uniti, 84132
- Utah VA Medical Center
-
-
Vermont
-
Burlington, Vermont, Stati Uniti, 05401
- The University of Vermont- Fletcher Allen Health Care
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- AHFS as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography)
- AHFS is the primary cause of hospitalization
- Prior clinical diagnosis of HF
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction(LVEF) ≤ 40% during the preceding 3 months (if no echo within the preceding 3 months, an LVEF ≤ 30% during the preceding three years is acceptable)
- On evidence-based medication for HF (including beta-blocker and ACE-inhibitor/ARB) or previously deemed intolerant
- Use of at least 80 mg or furosemide total daily dose (or equivalent) prior to admission for AHFS (a lower dose of a loop diuretic combined with a thiazide will count as an "equivalent")
- Willingness to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- AHFS due to acute myocarditis or acute Myocardial Infarction
- Ongoing hemodynamically significant arrhythmias contributing to HF decompensation
- Inotrope, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or other mechanical circulatory support use at the time of consent. Prior use will not exclude a patient.
- Current or planned left ventricular assist device therapy in next 180 days
- United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A or 1B
- B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP)< 250 or NT-proBNP<1,000 (Not required per protocol but if available and too low would be an exclusion; within 48 hours of consent)
- Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 8.0 g/dl
- Glomerular filtration rate(GFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 within 48 hours of consent
- Systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg at consent
- Resting Heart Rate > 110 at consent
- Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks as defined by electrocardiographic (ECG) changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent)
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 4 weeks
- Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Infiltrative cardiomyopathy
- Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade
- Complex congenital heart disease
- Non-cardiac pulmonary edema
- More than moderate aortic or mitral stenosis
- Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with severe mitral, aortic or tricuspid regurgitation
- Sepsis, active infection (excluding cystitis) or other comorbidity driving the HF decompensation
- Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, International Normalized Ration (INR) > 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment
- Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
- Previous adverse reaction to the study drug
- Receipt of any investigational product in the previous 30 days.
- Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized therapeutic clinical trial in next 6 months.
- Inability to comply with planned study procedures
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding mothers
- Women of reproductive age not on adequate contraception
- History of acute or chronic pancreatitis
- History of symptomatic gastroparesis
- Familial or personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia type-2 (MEN2)
- Prior weight-loss surgery (i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) or other gastric surgery associated with increased endogenous GLP-1 production
- Prior or ongoing treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists
- Ongoing treatment with dipeptidyl peptide-IV inhibitors (1 week washout required)
- Ongoing treatment with thiazolidinedione
- Oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Diabetic patients with history of 2 or more severe hypoglycemia, Diabetic Ketoacidosis(DKA) or hyperglycemic, hyperosmotic nonketotic coma in the preceding 12 months.
- Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
40. If diabetic, inadequate glycemic control with glucose level > 300 mg/dL within 24 hours of randomization
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparatore attivo: Liraglutide
Increasing dose from 0.6mg, 1.2mg to 1.8mg SQ daily.
|
Active Drug
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore placebo: Placebo
Placebo dose increasing from 0.6mg, 1.2mg to 1.8 mg SQ daily.
|
Placebo
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Global Ranking of Predefined Events
Lasso di tempo: Randomization to 180 days
|
A rank score based on time to death, time to adjudicated heart failure hospitalization, and time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP through d180.
For patients that died, the patient with the shortest time from randomization to death is assigned rank 1, the second shortest time is assigned rank 2, etc.
The patient with the longest time from randomization to death is assigned rank X.
For patients that did not die but had a heart failure hospitalization, the patient with the shortest time from randomization to re-admission is assigned rank X+1 and the patient with the longest time from randomization to heart failure hospitalization is assigned rank Y.
For patients that did not die or have a heart failure hospitalization, increases in time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP indicate a worse result and the largest increase is assigned rank Y+1.
The patient with the largest decrease is assigned rank N, where N is the sample size.
|
Randomization to 180 days
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index from baseline to 180 days.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume Index
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume index from baseline to day 180.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to day 180
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Change in Medial Filling Pressure
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Change in medial filling pressure baseline to day 180.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Change in Lateral Filling Pressure
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Change in lateral filling pressure baseline to day 180.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to day 30
|
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to day 30
|
Baseline to day 30
|
|
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 90 days
|
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to 90 days.
|
Baseline to 90 days
|
|
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Change in 6 minute walk distance baseline to 180 days.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 30 days
|
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) baseline to 30 days.
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.
For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established.
Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Baseline to 30 days
|
|
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 90 days
|
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) baseline to 90 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.
For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established.
Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Baseline to 90 days
|
|
Change in Clinical Summary Score Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to day 180
|
Change in clinical summary score using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) from baseline to day 180.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.
For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established.
Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Baseline to day 180
|
|
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 30 days
|
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 30 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.
For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established.
Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Baseline to 30 days
|
|
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 90 days
|
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 90 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.
For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established.
Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Baseline to 90 days
|
|
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score.
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) change in overall summary score baseline to 180 days.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.
For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established.
Each question is answered by the subject on a 6 point scale (Extremely limited, quite a bit limited, moderately limited, slightly limited, not at all limited, Limited for other reasons or did not do this activity).Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Mortality
Lasso di tempo: Randomization to 180 days
|
Individual component of the primary endpoint of mortality at 180 days after randomization
|
Randomization to 180 days
|
|
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Heart Failure Hospitalization
Lasso di tempo: Randomization to 180 days
|
Individual component of the primary endpoint- Heart Failure hospitalization from randomization to 180 days
|
Randomization to 180 days
|
|
Individual Component of the Primary Endpoint- Time-averaged Proportional Change in NT-proBNP
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
Individual component of the primary endpoint- time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 180 days
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
|
Global Ranking of Predefined Events
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to 180 days
|
A rank score based on time to death, time to adjudicated heart failure hospitalization, time to emergency department visit and time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP through d180.
See Outcome Measure 1 for a general description of the outcome derivation.
|
Baseline to 180 days
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Cattedra di studio: Eugene Bruanwald, MD, Harvard University
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Lerman JB, Giamberardino SN, Hernandez AF, Felker GM, Shah SH, McGarrah RW. Plasma metabolites associated with functional and clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with and without type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):9183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12973-0.
- Redouane B, Greene SJ, Fudim M, Vaduganathan M, Ambrosy AP, Sun JL, DeVore AD, McNulty SE, Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Felker GM, Cooper LB, Borlaug BA, Velazquez EJ, Margulies KB, Sharma A. Effects of Liraglutide on Worsening Renal Function Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the FIGHT Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 May;13(5):e006758. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006758. Epub 2020 May 4.
- Sharma A, Ambrosy AP, DeVore AD, Margulies KB, McNulty SE, Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Michael Felker G, Cooper LB, Lala A, Vader J, Groake JD, Borlaug BA, Velazquez EJ. Liraglutide and weight loss among patients with advanced heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: insights from the FIGHT trial. ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1035-1043. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12334. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
- Margulies KB, Hernandez AF, Redfield MM, Givertz MM, Oliveira GH, Cole R, Mann DL, Whellan DJ, Kiernan MS, Felker GM, McNulty SE, Anstrom KJ, Shah MR, Braunwald E, Cappola TP; NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Effects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):500-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10260.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Stima)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- Pro00042633
- 5U10HL084904-09 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Insufficienza cardiaca acuta
-
Region SkaneIscrizione su invitoInsufficienza cardiaca Classe II della New York Heart Association (NYHA). | Insufficienza cardiaca Classe III della New York Heart Association (NYHA).Svezia
-
Yonsei UniversityReclutamentoIschemic Heart Disease | Cardiopatia Non IschemicaCorea del Sud
-
Medical University of BialystokMedical University of Lodz; Poznan University of Medical Sciences; Nicolaus Copernicus... e altri collaboratoriTerminatoInsufficienza cardiaca, sistolica | Insufficienza cardiaca con frazione di eiezione ridotta | Scompenso cardiaco Classe IV della New York Heart Association | Scompenso cardiaco Classe III della New York Heart AssociationPolonia
-
University of WashingtonAmerican Heart AssociationCompletatoInsufficienza cardiaca, congestizia | Alterazione mitocondriale | Scompenso cardiaco Classe IV della New York Heart AssociationStati Uniti
-
Portuguese Association of Interventional CardiologyMedtronicReclutamentoStenosi Aortica Sintomatica Grave (Definita come Classe New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ II)Portogallo
-
Fenerbahce UniversityIscrizione su invitoUstioni acuteTurchia (Türkiye)
-
People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous...CompletatoLesioni polmonari acute (ALI)Cina
-
BioMérieuxReclutamentoInfezioni respiratorie acute (ARI)Stati Uniti
-
Lumos DiagnosticsReclutamento
-
Tam Anh Research InstituteReclutamentoInfezioni respiratorie acute (ARI)Vietnam