- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT07672145
Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via Subxiphoid vs Infraumbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via the Subxiphoid Port and the Infraumbilical Port During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease due to its advantages in reducing postoperative pain and recovery times. However, surgeons continue to debate the optimal port site for retrieving the gallbladder specimen from the abdominal cavity, as this choice can influence wound-related morbidity.
Traditionally, the gallbladder is extracted through the infraumbilical port site. While effective, this route is associated with a potential risk of port-site infections due to bacterial colonization within the umbilicus and risk of contamination during specimen extraction. Retrieving the gallbladder through the subxiphoid port has been proposed as an alternative technique that may utilize a cleaner surgical site, potentially reducing patient pain scores and regional wound complications.
This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to directly compare the clinical outcomes of extracting the gallbladder through the subxiphoid port versus the traditional infraumbilical port. The study will evaluate and compare mean postoperative pain intensity within the first 24 hours, as well as the regional development of port-site infections, seromas, or hematomas within 7 days following elective laparoscopic surgery.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
This study is structured as a parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, to evaluate the optimal retrieval site for specimen extraction during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Eligible patients aged 18 to 60 years diagnosed with symptomatic gallstone disease who meet all predefined inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. All surgical procedures will be standardized and performed under general anesthesia by a senior consultant surgeon using a conventional four-port technique. Following the successful mobilization of the gallbladder, the specimen will be enclosed safely inside a sterile endo-bag to control potential bile contamination.
Patients will then be dynamically allocated via a computer-generated randomization system into one of two surgical groups:
- Group A (Experimental Arm): The endo-bag containing the gallbladder is carefully retrieved through the subxiphoid port site under direct vision.
- Group B (Active Comparator Arm): The endo-bag containing the gallbladder is retrieved through the primary infraumbilical camera port site under direct vision.
Postoperatively, all participating patients will be systematically tracked for primary and secondary outcomes. Postoperative physical distress will be quantified while the patient is at rest using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at regular intervals of 6, 12, and 24 hours. Additionally, specialized clinical assessments will be performed through the first 7 postoperative days to monitor and log the occurrence of port-site infections, staged using the Southampton Wound Classification system, alongside local complications including seroma or hematoma formation.
Statistical analyses will be executed using SPSS, utilizing independent t-tests for quantitative variables and Chi-square testing for qualitative categorical outcomes to evaluate significance.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Stimato)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Contatto studio
- Nome: Dr Abdur Rehman, MBBS
- Numero di telefono: +92 331 4344721
- Email: oabdurrehmanazad@gmail.com
Backup dei contatti dello studio
- Nome: Dr Muhammad Abdullah, MBBS
- Numero di telefono: +92 315 2480028
- Email: oabdullahch@gmail.com
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
- Reclutamento
- Department of Surgery ,Mayo Hospital
-
Contatto:
- Dr. Abdur Rehman, MBBS
- Numero di telefono: +92 331 4344 721
- Email: Oabdurrehmanazad@gmail.com
-
Investigatore principale:
- Muhammad Zeeshan Sarwar, MBBS,FCPS
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
Accetta volontari sani
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 to 60 years.
- Diagnosed with symptomatic gallstones on ultrasonography.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Presence of acute or empyematous cholecystitis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intraoperative conversion to open cholecystectomy.
- Diagnosed with Diabetes mellitus type 2.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Separare
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Group A: Subxiphoid Port Extraction
Patients undergoing standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy where the gallbladder specimen is placed in a sterile endo-bag and extracted through the subxiphoid port site under direct vision to minimize bile spillage.
|
Following standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped and divided.
The gallbladder specimen is then placed within a sterile endo-bag and extracted through the subxiphoid port site under direct laparoscopic visualization to minimize bile spillage and abdominal wall contamination.
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Group B: Infraumbilical Port Extraction
Patients undergoing standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy where the gallbladder specimen is placed in a sterile endo-bag and extracted through the primary infraumbilical (camera) port site under direct vision.
|
Following standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped and divided.
The gallbladder specimen is then placed within a sterile endo-bag and extracted through the primary camera port site at the infraumbilical incision under direct laparoscopic visualization.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Postoperative Pain Score
Lasso di tempo: At 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery
|
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed while the patient is at rest using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Worst Possible Pain".
|
At 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Port-Site Infection
Lasso di tempo: Up to 7 postoperative days
|
The presence and severity of port-site infections will be evaluated and graded according to the objective criteria of the Southampton Wound Classification System (Grades 0 to V)
|
Up to 7 postoperative days
|
|
Incidence of Local Wound-Related Complications
Lasso di tempo: Up to 7 postoperative days
|
The development of local wound site complications, specifically tracking the presence or absence of a clinically or ultrasonographically confirmed seroma (clear fluid collection) or hematoma (localized blood collection).
|
Up to 7 postoperative days
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Dr Muhammad Zeeshan Sarwar, MBBS,FCPS, King Edward Medical University
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Li M, Cao B, Gong R, Sun D, Zhang P, Jiang X, Sheng Y. Randomized trial of umbilical incisional hernia in high-risk patients: extraction of gallbladder through subxiphoid port vs. umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Sep;13(3):342-349. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76001. Epub 2018 May 25.
- Sasmal PK, Mishra TS, Rath S, Meher S, Mohapatra D. Port site infection in laparoscopic surgery: A review of its management. World J Clin Cases. 2015 Oct 16;3(10):864-71. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i10.864.
- Ye X, Niu X, Bai D, Cao Y, Mao Y, Liu H, Luo Y, Fuyu-Li, Cheng N, You Z. Comparison of gallbladder extraction via the subxiphoid port and the supraumbilical port during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):628-634. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001932.
- Mohamed HK, Albendary M, Wuheb AA, Ali O, Mohammed MJ, Osman M, Elshikhawoda MSM, Mohamedahmed AY. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Bag Extraction Versus Direct Extraction for Retrieval of Gallbladder After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Cureus. 2023 Feb 26;15(2):e35493. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35493. eCollection 2023 Feb.
- Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Clark MC, Barratt OA, Taktak S, Subar D, Henley N. Retrieval of Gallbladder Via Umbilical Versus Epigastric Port Site During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Oct;29(5):321-327. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000662.
- Mannam R, Sankara Narayanan R, Bansal A, Yanamaladoddi VR, Sarvepalli SS, Vemula SL, Aramadaka S. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2023 Sep 21;15(9):e45704. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45704. eCollection 2023 Sep.
- Khalid A, Khalil K, Mehmood Qadri H, Ahmad CZ, Fatima W, Raza A, Asif MA, Luqman MS, Jawariah, Nizami MFK. Comparison of Postoperative Complications of Open Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy According to the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification System. Cureus. 2023 Aug 17;15(8):e43642. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43642. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Stimato)
Completamento dello studio (Stimato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- Dr Abdur Rehman
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Colecistite acuta
-
People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous...CompletatoLesioni polmonari acute (ALI)Cina
-
Fenerbahce UniversityIscrizione su invitoUstioni acuteTurchia (Türkiye)
-
BioMérieuxReclutamentoInfezioni respiratorie acute (ARI)Stati Uniti
-
Lumos DiagnosticsReclutamento
-
Tam Anh Research InstituteReclutamentoInfezioni respiratorie acute (ARI)Vietnam
-
Lohmann & RauscherReclutamentoFerite acute e cronicheGermania
-
MMSx Authority Institute for Movement Mechanics...CompletatoDolore muscoloscheletrico - Condizioni acute e subacuteStati Uniti, India
-
Aswan UniversityIscrizione su invitoDiagnosi precoce di lesioni renali acuteEgitto
-
Antoni RibasNon ancora reclutamentoLa guarigione delle ferite | Ferite Cutanee AcuteStati Uniti
-
Region of Southern DenmarkOdense Municipality, Denmark; Kerteminde Municipality, Denmark; Svendborg Municipality...Completato
Prove cliniche su Subxiphoid Gallbladder Retrieval
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletatoDisturbo da uso di nicotinaStati Uniti