このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)

2026年9月11日 更新者:Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.

The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.

To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.

A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.

A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.

A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.

調査の概要

状態

招待による登録

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.

In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.

Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.

Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.

The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.

After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.

Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.

The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

900

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前:Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
  • 電話番号:+49 30 209346-180
  • メール:office@social.mpg.de

研究場所

    • State of Berlin
      • Berlin、State of Berlin、ドイツ、10557
        • Social Neuroscience lab manages the Edu:Social study-based app

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18- and 68-years old.
  • Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
  • Proficient in German.
  • Informed consent.
  • No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
  • Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient German proficiency.
  • Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No informed consent.
  • Not currently working as a school teacher.
  • Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
  • Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
    • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)

      • In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:基礎科学
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
アクティブコンパレータ:Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
  1. In this intervention, participants will practice 13-minute basic attention-based mindfulness meditation such as the Breathing Meditation (BM). BM is a 13-minute individual exercise that requires participants to focus their attention on the sensations of breathing. Participants have to sustain their attention to breath for long stretches of time, and have to return their attention to their breath when their mind wanders. The key focus is on training attention and interoceptive body awareness. Other practices participants will be taught is mindfulness on sounds (here the object of attention is not the breath but sounds in the environment) as well as open presence meditation.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert mindfulness teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the mindfulness practice and educate teachers about bodily sensations, attention, rumination.
他の:Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
  1. Initially, participants in the WLC group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.
  2. The WLC will be offered the EmCo training only after both intervention groups have completed their trainings

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
うつ病不安ストレス尺度 (DASS-21)
時間枠:ベースライン時(事前検査)および8週間の介入期間後(事後検査1および2)に評価
うつ、不安、ストレスを測定する尺度(Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021)。 スコアが高いほど、うつ、不安、ストレスの程度が高いことを示す。
ベースライン時(事前検査)および8週間の介入期間後(事後検査1および2)に評価
UCLA孤独感尺度(UCLA)
時間枠:ベースライン(プレテスト)および8週間の介入期間後(ポストテスト1および2)に評価
孤独の重症度を測定する尺度(Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980)。 高いスコアはより多くの孤独を示します。
ベースライン(プレテスト)および8週間の介入期間後(ポストテスト1および2)に評価
Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
時間枠:ベースライン時(事前テスト)および8週間の介入期間後(事後テスト1および2)に評価
心理的回復力(レジリエンス)を測定する尺度(Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015)。 高得点はより高い回復力を示します。
ベースライン時(事前テスト)および8週間の介入期間後(事後テスト1および2)に評価
サセックス・オックスフォード 自己と他者への思いやり尺度 (SOCS)
時間枠:ベースライン(事前テスト)、共感的傾聴トレーニング4週間後(介入中)、および思いやりのある傾聴トレーニング4週間後(事後テスト1および2)に評価
自己への思いやり(SOCS-S)と他者への思いやり(SOCS-O;Gu et al., 2020)を測定する尺度。 スコアが高いほど、思いやりが強いことを示します。
ベースライン(事前テスト)、共感的傾聴トレーニング4週間後(介入中)、および思いやりのある傾聴トレーニング4週間後(事後テスト1および2)に評価
対処戦略
時間枠:EMAデザインを用いて評価され、1日あたり5回のプッシュ通知測定が行われ、5つの3時間間隔に分散され、2週間の期間内の4日間に実施され、事前テスト(ベースライン)および8週間の介入期間後(介入後)に行われました。
Brief-COPE(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)および認知的情動調整質問票(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)に基づくカスタム項目で、対処戦略(受容、ポジティブな再解釈、社会的支援、反芻、自己非難、注意転換)を測定します。 高いスコアは、特定の対処戦略の使用頻度が高いことを示します。
EMAデザインを用いて評価され、1日あたり5回のプッシュ通知測定が行われ、5つの3時間間隔に分散され、2週間の期間内の4日間に実施され、事前テスト(ベースライン)および8週間の介入期間後(介入後)に行われました。
アクティブ・エンパシック・リスニング・スケール (AELS)
時間枠:ベースライン時(事前テスト)、共感的傾聴トレーニングの4週間後(介入中)、思いやりのある傾聴トレーニングの4週間後(事後テスト1&2)に評価
能動的共感的傾聴を測定する尺度(Bodie, 2011)。 スコアが高いほど、より能動的共感的傾聴を示します。
ベースライン時(事前テスト)、共感的傾聴トレーニングの4週間後(介入中)、思いやりのある傾聴トレーニングの4週間後(事後テスト1&2)に評価
Prosodic Feature Pitch
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008). Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020). Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mind-Wandering
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
Stress intensity
時間枠:Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
時間枠:Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid. Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions. In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density. Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
ポジティブ感情(感情グリッド)(説明メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間の介入期間中、毎週評価されました
感情状態(快不快)と覚醒度の評価(Russell et al., 1989)。 快不快と覚醒度のスコアが高いほど、より肯定的な感情と高い覚醒度を示します。
8週間の介入期間中、毎週評価されました
感謝アンケート-6 (GQ-5-G) (説明メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間のコース中に毎週評価
感謝の気持ちを測定する尺度(Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002)。 スコアが高いほど感謝の気持ちが強いことを示します。
8週間のコース中に毎週評価
Self-Kindness Scale (SCS-SF) (説明的メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間のコース中に毎週評価
自己への親切さと思いやりの態度を測定する自己報告式質問紙(Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011)。 スコアが高いほど自己への親切さが大きいことを示します。
8週間のコース中に毎週評価
ポジティブ解釈バイアス(ERT)(説明メカニズム)
時間枠:ベースライン時(事前テスト)および8週間の介入期間後(事後テスト1および2)に評価
この課題では、変形された一連の顔の表情(DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015)を用いて、人物の顔の表情をより肯定的に判断する傾向を評価します。 高いスコアは、より強い肯定的な解釈バイアスを示します。
ベースライン時(事前テスト)および8週間の介入期間後(事後テスト1および2)に評価
Short Loneliness Scale (SLS) (説明メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間のコース期間中に毎週評価
孤独感の頻度、強度、持続時間を測定する短縮尺度(Hughes et al., 2004; Qualter et al., 2021)。 スコアが高いほど孤独感が強いことを示します。
8週間のコース期間中に毎週評価
うつ病(PHQ-2)(説明メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間のコース中、毎週評価されました
抑うつ気分や快感消失(anhedonia)など、中核的な抑うつ症状を評価する簡易自己報告式スクリーニング尺度(Kroenke et al., 2003)。 スコアが高いほど、抑うつ症状の重症度が高いことを示します。
8週間のコース中、毎週評価されました
共感的関心と苦痛 (IRI) (説明メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間のコース期間中、毎週評価されました
社会的感情のさまざまな側面(個人的苦痛や共感的関心を含む)を測定する尺度(Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009)。 スコアが高いほど、個人的苦痛または共感的関心の程度が高いことを示します。
8週間のコース期間中、毎週評価されました
集団内-集団外バイアス(ERT)(説明メカニズム)
時間枠:ベースライン(事前テスト)および8週間の介入期間後(事後テスト1&2)に評価
この課題は、モーフィングされた表情の連続画像を用いて、自分自身のグループに属する人物の表情認識において、より肯定的な判断を下す傾向を評価します (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015)。 高いスコアは、より強い内集団・外集団バイアスを示します。
ベースライン(事前テスト)および8週間の介入期間後(事後テスト1&2)に評価
対処戦略(説明メカニズム)
時間枠:8週間のコース期間中、毎週評価
Brief-COPE(Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005)および認知的情動調節質問票(CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011)に基づくカスタム項目であり、対処戦略(受容、ポジティブな再解釈、社会的支援、反芻、自己非難、気晴らし)を測定します。 スコアが高いほど、指定された対処戦略の使用頻度が高いことを示します。
8週間のコース期間中、毎週評価
DPR-Affect(感情グリッド;説明メカニズム)
時間枠:介入期間中8週間評価、日々の運動の前
ダイアド開始直前における情動状態(快・不快)と覚醒度の評価(Russell et al., 1989)。 快・不快と覚醒度のスコアが高いほど、より肯定的な情動と高い覚醒度を示します。
介入期間中8週間評価、日々の運動の前
DPR-Emotions
時間枠:Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)の一部として、週1から週8まで毎週評価
ダイアッドの話者と聴者がダイアッド直後に評価した感情強度(例:幸福、感謝、悲しみ、怒り)。
Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)の一部として、週1から週8まで毎週評価
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
時間枠:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025). Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
時間枠:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
時間枠:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
時間枠:Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023). Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
時間枠:Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
DPR-Listening-Affect
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
時間枠:Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
時間枠:Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
患者健康問診票(PHQ-9;事前スクリーニング)
時間枠:介入前に評価され、うつ症状の臨床レベルを持つ個人を研究から事前に除外するために、一度だけ実施されます
うつ病を評価する尺度(Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006)。 スコアが高いほど、うつ病の程度が高いことを示します。
介入前に評価され、うつ症状の臨床レベルを持つ個人を研究から事前に除外するために、一度だけ実施されます
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
時間枠:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
時間枠:Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007). Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
時間枠:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
General demographic questions
時間枠:Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
Self-generated demographic items.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Tania Singer, PhD、Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • 主任研究者:Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D.、Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • 主任研究者:Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D.、Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年8月28日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年12月20日

研究の完了 (推定)

2027年4月3日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月26日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月4日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月9日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年9月15日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年9月11日

最終確認日

2026年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • Edu:Social School Study 2

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。