Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Online Socio-emotional Dyad Training for School Teachers' Well-being and Social Skills (EduSocSchool2)

perjantai 11. syyskuuta 2026 päivittänyt: Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab

Edu:Social School Study2: Promoting Well-being and Socio-emotional Skills for School Teachers With App-based Mindfulness and Dyadic Empathy-compassion Trainings.

The Edu:Social School Study 2 is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an 8-week socio-emotional, partner-based empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo) compared with a mindfulness-based training (MBT) and a waitlist control group (WLC) in school teachers.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the adapted 8-week online EmCo Dyad training program across multiple domains of teacher functioning. Seven domains capture individual-level outcomes: (1) mental health, (2) resilience, (3) attention and cognitive processes, (4) social emotions, (5) stress coping and emotion regulation, (6) listening skills, and (7) voice-based emotional expression (DYVA). Two additional domains assess broader contextual outcomes: (8) classroom teaching and (9) organizational/school level outcomes, reflecting how individual-level changes may translate into perceived changes in the teaching and school context.

To this end, participants will be randomized into one of three groups: (1) an 8-week EmCo Dyad intervention (EmCo), (2) an 8-week mindfulness-based training program (MBT), or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC) that will receive the EmCo intervention after completion of the initial post-test. Both interventions are delivered online via a dedicated study application to ensure scalability and accessibility.

A second aim is to validate the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) as a measure of teachers' perceived social interactions and network structures. This study represents the first randomized controlled trial in teachers to examine whether changes in internal psychological processes are associated with perceived changes in the perception of the quality of interaction between school teachers and their students in the classroom as well as between school teachers and their colleagues in school.

A third aim is to introduce and validate objective measures of emotional processing based on AI-based voice analysis in educational field research. Specifically, the study will evaluate two tasks using different parameters of AI-based emotional voice analysis: (a) the Teacher Voice Assessment (TEAVA), in which teachers' voices are recorded during a teaching-related task, and (b) the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA), conducted during the daily partner-based Dyad practice. In both tasks, non-semantic vocal features (e.g., pitch, loudness, speaking rate, intonation) and vocal emotional expressions (e.g., arousal, valence, dominance, and basic emotional categories) will be analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. No speech content will be transcribed or analyzed.

A final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying intervention-related changes. Based on prior research, the EmCo Dyad training is expected to enhance care- and affiliation-related motivational systems associated with positive affect, social emotions and connectedness, and prosocial behavior, while reducing loneliness, social stress, and other forms of psychological vulnerability. In contrast, mindfulness-based training is expected to primarily strengthen attention- and thought-related processes, including present-moment awareness, calming the mind and executive attentional control. These mechanisms are expected to contribute to improvements in mental health and overall well-being across both intervention groups.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Ilmoittautuminen kutsusta

Ehdot

Interventio / Hoito

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

The teaching profession is widely recognized as highly demanding, and teachers report elevated rates of stress and burnout. If left unaddressed, burnout adversely affects teachers' health, job performance, teaching quality, and school turnover rates. Moreover, teacher burnout has important consequences for students. Teachers' emotional exhaustion has been shown to negatively affect students' academic achievement and self-concept in Germany. Given teachers' pivotal role in shaping children's socio-emotional development, addressing psychological vulnerability-including stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and exhaustion-is essential. Strengthening resilience enables teachers to maintain well-being and effective classroom functioning in the face of adversity by supporting adaptive stress management. In addition, strong interpersonal skills such as empathy, compassion and high-quality listening play an important role in the teacher-student communication. Addressing psychological vulnerability and strengthening resilience and social skills, is essential not only for teacher well-being but also for the functioning of educational systems broadly.

In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions focusing on individual mental practices have been expanded to include partner-based social practices (Dyads), which specifically target social skills such as empathy, (self-)compassion, social connectedness and different types of listening. However, dyadic interventions, that is daily mental practices done with a partner, have not yet been systematically investigated in educational settings. Existing evidence suggests that contemplative Dyads may be more effective than solitary mindfulness practices in reducing loneliness and social stress, enhancing social connection, and strengthening resilience. Moreover, dyadic practices appear to engage mechanisms that differ from those underlying traditional mindfulness-based interventions.

Empathy, (self-)compassion, and high-quality listening are core socio-emotional skills in school contexts. However, empathy may lead to empathic distress when individuals are repeatedly exposed to others' suffering, whereas compassion is considered more protective due to its association with positive affect and prosocial motivation. To address this distinction, the Edu:Social School Study 2 implements an empathy-compassion Dyad training program (EmCo), which trains participants in empathic listening and emotion regulation during the first four weeks, followed by (self-)compassion and compassionate listening during the subsequent four weeks.

The EmCo program builds on the Affect Dyad developed in the ReSource project and the online Dyad 10-week intervention program with weekly online coachings and daily app-based Dyads implemented in the CovSocial project. These two large-scale mental training studies, have shown that different types of practices produce distinct effects on psychological and biological outcomes. The ReSource project, a 9-month longitudinal study using behavioral, hormonal, autonomic and neuroimaging (fMRI) measures, compared three training modules, including a mindfulness-based "Presence" module, a socio-affective "Affect" module (including the Affect Dyad) and a socio-cognitive "Perspective" module, and demonstrated that training content differentially affects mind, behavior and brain. Building on this work, the CovSocial project implemented a 10-week fully online design comparing a low-dose purely online socio-emotional Dyad training with a mindfulness-based active control training group. Results showed both shared and distinct effects: while both interventions improved mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and compassion, the Dyad training showed stronger effects on resilience, positivity bias, social connectedness, and reductions in loneliness and social stress.

Further, mediation analyses suggest that individual mindfulness practices and partner-based Dyadic practices influence well-being through partly distinct psychological mechanisms, whereas care-based motivational processes could account for Dyad-practice effects and thought-related process for mindfulness-practice effects.

Compared with these prior interventions, the present Edu:Social School intervention program introduces a novel empathy versus compassion listening component and reduces the duration from 10 to 8 weeks, improving feasibility within applied school settings. In an initial Edu:Social School pilot study, 120 teachers participated in a 10-week socio-emotional training program (EmCo). The pilot demonstrated high compliance and provided preliminary evidence for reductions in psychological vulnerability. However, the study lacked an active control group and a reliable waitlist control group, limiting interpretation. In addition, the 10-week duration was difficult to implement within the German school calendar.

The present study is a randomized controlled trial in a sample of school teachers (target N = 900). A multimethod assessment approach will be used, including validated trait and state self-report questionnaires, behavioral phone-based tasks administered via an app application, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) delivered through smartphone notifications. These different assessments are capturing changes across the nine domains mentioned before.

After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) an empathy-compassion training group (EmCo), based on the Affect Dyad daily mental practice; (2) a mindfulness-based training group, based on attention-based mindfulness practices; or (3) a waitlist control group (WLC). All participants will first complete a pre-test assessment phase, including baseline psychometric measures, phone-based tasks, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants in the intervention groups will then be onboarded through two group-specific online sessions (Onboarding I and II) led by trained instructors, followed by participation in their respective 8-week programs delivered via a dedicated web and smartphone application. These programs include daily partner-based Dyad practices or mindfulness meditations, respectively, as well as weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert mental training teachers. Throughout the intervention period, participants will complete brief weekly self-report questionnaires, EMA, and daily pre-post Dyad practice ratings (DPR) to assess changes in key psychological and social processes, which will be examined as potential mediators. At the end of the intervention, all participants will complete a post-test assessment phase comparable to the pre-test (T0) and mid-test (TM), with the addition of a final feedback questionnaire.

Following completion of the initial post-test (T1), participants in the waitlist control group will subsequently receive the same 8-week socio-emotional Dyad intervention (EmCo) and complete an additional mid-tests (TM1) and post-test assessment (T2). After both training groups (EmCo and MBT) have completed their respective interventions, participants will be offered the opportunity to continue their practice via the study app. Participants in the EmCo group will be invited to continue the Dyad practice, whereas participants in the MBT group may choose to continue either the mindfulness-based practice or switch to the EmCo Dyad intervention. This phase of voluntary continued practice will take place in parallel with the 8-week EmCo Dyad training offered to the WLC following post-test.

The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is publicly available at https://osf.io/x59pk

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)

900

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskeluyhteys

  • Nimi: Lab Manager Social Neuroscience Lab
  • Puhelinnumero: +49 30 209346-180
  • Sähköposti: office@social.mpg.de

Opiskelupaikat

    • State of Berlin
      • Berlin, State of Berlin, Saksa, 10557
        • Social Neuroscience lab manages the Edu:Social study-based app

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

  • Aikuinen
  • Vanhempi Aikuinen

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Joo

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18- and 68-years old.
  • Currently working as a school teacher in Germany or Austria; grades 1-12; primary, secondary, special needs, and vocational schools.
  • Proficient in German.
  • Informed consent.
  • No symptoms of psychiatric disease within the past two years; healthy population, non-clinical population.
  • Stable internet access and necessary technical equipment (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No regular contemplative practice (≤ 50 hours total within the past six months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient German proficiency.
  • Lack of stable internet access or required devices (mobile phone with internet access).
  • No informed consent.
  • Not currently working as a school teacher.
  • Regular contemplative practice (> 50 hours in the past six months (e.g., dyad, mindfulness, compassion-based practices).
  • Current psychiatric diagnosis or therapy, or reaching screening cutoffs on:

    • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Martin et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2004; Cutoff ≥ 20; or endorsing suicidality on the item 9),
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; Cutoff ≥ 15),
    • Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000; Cutoff ≥ 61)

      • In addition, participants will complete the Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003) which is not used as quantitative exclusion criteria in step 3, but provides additional information to support the phone call with one of the teachers, as part of the screening process.

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Perustiede
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Kaksinkertainen

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training (EmCo)
The socio-emotional intervention will consist of two 1.5h online onboarding I and II sessions and then 8 weeks of weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions with expert teachers as well as daily dyad practice with a partner over 8 week.
  1. Participants engage in a structured 13-minute partner-based contemplative exercise. Each dyad reflects on two experiences from the previous 24 hours: one involving a difficult emotion and one involving gratitude. Partners take turns speaking while the other listens non-judgmentally. During weeks 1-4, the practice emphasizes empathic listening; during weeks 5-8, compassionate listening. Participants are instructed to attend to bodily sensations associated with the emotions described. The practice aims to improve coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, (self)acceptance, compassion, gratitude, resilience.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert Dyad teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion.
Active Comparator: Mindfulness-based Training (MBT)
MBT includes onboarding sessions, weekly coaching, and daily mindfulness practice over 8 weeks.
  1. In this intervention, participants will practice 13-minute basic attention-based mindfulness meditation such as the Breathing Meditation (BM). BM is a 13-minute individual exercise that requires participants to focus their attention on the sensations of breathing. Participants have to sustain their attention to breath for long stretches of time, and have to return their attention to their breath when their mind wanders. The key focus is on training attention and interoceptive body awareness. Other practices participants will be taught is mindfulness on sounds (here the object of attention is not the breath but sounds in the environment) as well as open presence meditation.
  2. Participants also attend eight 1.5-hour online group sessions led by Expert mindfulness teachers. The coaching sessions help deepen the mindfulness practice and educate teachers about bodily sensations, attention, rumination.
Muut: Waitlist Control Group (WLC)
WLC receives EmCo training only after both intervention groups complete their programs.
  1. Initially, participants in the WLC group will not receive the intervention. They will complete pre- and post-test procedures consisting primarily of self-report questionnaires, and behavioral tasks, as well as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) conducted on four days within two weeks at pre-test and post-test 1 & 2.
  2. The WLC will be offered the EmCo training only after both intervention groups have completed their trainings

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Masennus-, ahdistus- ja stressiasteikko (DASS-21)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu lähtötilanteessa (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Asteikko, joka mittaa masennusta, ahdistusta ja stressiä (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Nilges & Essau, 2021). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat enemmän masennusta, ahdistusta ja stressiä.
Arvioitu lähtötilanteessa (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
UCLA Yksinäisyysasteikko (UCLA)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu lähtötilanteessa (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Yksinäisyyden vakavuutta mittaava asteikko (Döring & Bortz, 1993; Russell et al., 1980). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat enemmän yksinäisyyttä.
Arvioitu lähtötilanteessa (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Connor Davidsonin resilienssiskaala (CD-RISC)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu lähtötilanteessa (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Psykologista sinnikkyyttä mittaava asteikko (Connor & Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat suurempaa sinnikkyyttä.
Arvioitu lähtötilanteessa (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Sussex-Oxfordin Myötätuntomittari Itselle ja Toisille (SOCS)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu alussa (esitesti), 4 viikon empaattisen kuuntelun harjoittelun jälkeen (intervention puolivälissä) sekä 4 viikon myötätuntoisen kuuntelun harjoittelun jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Itse-myötätunnon (SOCS-S) ja muiden myötätunnon (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020) mittaava asteikko.
Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat enemmän myötätuntoa.
Arvioitu alussa (esitesti), 4 viikon empaattisen kuuntelun harjoittelun jälkeen (intervention puolivälissä) sekä 4 viikon myötätuntoisen kuuntelun harjoittelun jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Selviytymisstrategiat
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin käyttäen EMA-suunnittelua viidellä push-ilmoituksen mittauksella päivässä, jotka jakautuivat viiteen kolmen tunnin väliin, neljänä päivänä kahden viikon jakson aikana, ennakkotestissä (Perustaso) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (intervention jälkeen).
Kohdennettuja kohteita perustuen Brief-COPE:hen (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) ja Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011), jotka mittaavat selviytymisstrategioita (hyväksyntä, positiivinen uudelleentulkinta, sosiaalinen tuki, jumiutuminen, itsesyytös, häiriö). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat tiettyjen selviytymisstrategioiden suurempaa käyttöä.
Arvioitiin käyttäen EMA-suunnittelua viidellä push-ilmoituksen mittauksella päivässä, jotka jakautuivat viiteen kolmen tunnin väliin, neljänä päivänä kahden viikon jakson aikana, ennakkotestissä (Perustaso) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (intervention jälkeen).
Aktiivisen empaattisen kuuntelun mittari (AELS)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu alkuarvona (esitesti), 4 viikon empaattisen kuuntelun koulutuksen jälkeen (intervention puolivälissä) ja 4 viikon myötätuntoisen kuuntelun koulutuksen jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Asteikko, joka mittaa aktiivista empaattista kuuntelua (Bodie, 2011). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat aktiivisempaa empaattista kuuntelua.
Arvioitu alkuarvona (esitesti), 4 viikon empaattisen kuuntelun koulutuksen jälkeen (intervention puolivälissä) ja 4 viikon myötätuntoisen kuuntelun koulutuksen jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Prosodic Feature Pitch
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature pitch (measured in Hz) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Loudness
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature loudness (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Speaking Rate
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature speaking rate (measured in syllables per minute) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Prosodic Feature Intonation
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Acoustic assessment of the prosodic speech feature intonation (unitless) during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Dimensions of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Assessment of continuous affective dimensions of vocalized emotional expressions during participants' daily Dyad practice using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: arousal, valence, and dominance (each ranging from -1 to 1). Based on arousal-valence scores, the following affect-quadrant values will be calculated: high-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-high-valence; low-arousal-low-valence; and high-arousal-low valence.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Affect Categories of Vocalized Emotional Expressions
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Classification of vocalized emotional expressions intro affect categories during participants' daily Dyad practice, analyzed using audEERING devAIce software. The following parameters will be assessed: angry, happy, and sad, expressed as unitless values ranging from 0 to 1 representing category likelihood.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, as part of the Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA)
Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). Higher scores indicate more burnout.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring the frequency and intensity of three distinct types of positive emotions: Activated PA (excitement, energy), Relaxed PA (calm, peacefulness), and Safe/Contentment PA (safety, security) (Gilbert et al., 2008). Higher scores indicate a greater frequency and intensity of experiencing specific types of positive emotions.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Executive control (Flanker Task; FT)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses executive control with three indices reaction times (RT), error rates, and the flanker effect (FE) (Trautwein et al., 2016; 2020). Faster RT, lower error rates and FE indicate higher cognitive control.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Mind-Wandering
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
These two questions embedded in the flanker task assess mind-wandering during attentional performance (Smallwood, 2015). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Klimecki et al., 2014, 2013). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test), after 4 weeks of empathic listening training (mid-intervention) and after the 4 weeks of compassionate listening training (post-test 1 & 2)
Stress intensity
Aikaikkuna: Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Custom item based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock & Wong, 1990) measuring stress intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Assessed using an EMA design with five push-notification measurements per day, distributed across five 3-hour intervals, on four days within a two-week period, at pre-test (Baseline) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-intervention).
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
A scale measuring psychological working conditions (stressors and coping resources) impact employee health and well-being (Kristensen et al., 2005; Nübling, 2005)
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)
The e-SNAP is a novel assessment paradigm based on the Affect Grid. Teachers rate their interactions with both students and colleagues in terms of frequency and pleasantness in interactions. In addition, teachers rate in both the student and colleague networks the relationships among each other, allowing to assess positive relations and network density. Higher scores indicate more frequent and more positively experienced interactions, as well as more cohesive and positively connected social networks.
Assessed at baseline (pre-test) and after the 8-week intervention period (post-test 1 & 2)

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Positiivinen mieliala (Affect Grid) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon interventiokauden aikana
Emotionaalisen tilan (valenssi) ja kiihottuneisuuden arviointi (Russell ym., 1989). Korkeammat valenssi- ja kiihottuneisuuspisteet osoittavat positiivisempaa tunnetilaa ja korkeampaa kiihottuneisuutta.
Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon interventiokauden aikana
Kiitollisuuskysely-6 (GQ-5-G) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Kiitollisuutta mittaava asteikko (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat enemmän kiitollisuutta.
Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Itsemyötätunnon mittari (SCS-SF) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Itsearviointikysely, joka mittaa itselle osoitettua ystävällisyyttä ja myötätuntoisia asenteita itseään kohtaan (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011; Raes et al., 2011). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat suurempaa itselle osoitettua ystävällisyyttä.
Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Positiivinen tulkintaharha (ERT) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu alkuperäisenä aikana (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Tämä tehtävä arvioi taipumusta arvioida ihmisten kasvonilmeitä positiivisemmin käyttämällä kasvonilmeiden muunnettuja sekvenssejä (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat vahvempaa positiivista tulkintahaipumusta.
Arvioitu alkuperäisenä aikana (esitesti) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitesti 1 & 2)
Lyhyt Yksinäisyysasteikko (SLS) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Lyhyt asteikko, joka mittaa yksinäisyyden esiintymistiheyttä, voimakkuutta ja kestoa (Hughes ym., 2004; Qualter ym., 2021). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat enemmän yksinäisyyttä.
Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Masennus (PHQ-2) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Lyhyt itsearviointimenetelmä, jolla arvioidaan keskeisiä masennusoireita, mukaan lukien masentunut mieliala ja anhedonia (Kroenke et al., 2003). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat vakavampia masennusoireita.
Arvioitu viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Empaattinen Huolenpito & Ahdistus (IRI) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Mittakaava, joka mittaa sosiaalisten tunteiden eri osa-alueita, mukaan lukien henkilökohtaista ahdistusta ja empatiaa (Davis, 1980; Paulus, 2009). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat korkeampaa henkilökohtaista ahdistusta tai empatiaa.
Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon aikana
Ryhmäsisäinen-ryhmäulkoinen harha (ERT) (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu alussa (esitestaus) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitestaus 1 & 2)
Tämä tehtävä arvioi taipumusta arvioida oman ryhmän jäseniä positiivisemmin kasvojen tunnistuksessa käyttäen morfattuja kasvonilmeiden sarjoja (DeBruine & Jones, 2017; Griffiths et al., 2015).
Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat voimakkaampaa ryhmänsisäistä–ryhmänulkoista harhaa.
Arvioitu alussa (esitestaus) ja 8 viikon interventiojakson jälkeen (jälkitestaus 1 & 2)
Selviytymisstrategiat (selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon ajan
Mukautetut kohteet perustuen Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005) ja Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) -kyselyihin, jotka mittaavat selviytymisstrategioita (hyväksyminen, positiivinen tulkinta, sosiaalinen tuki, ruminaatio, itsesyytös, harhautus). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat määriteltyjen selviytymisstrategioiden suurempaa käyttöä.
Arvioitiin viikoittain 8 viikon ajan
DPR-Affect (Affektiruudukko; selittävä mekanismi)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu 8 viikon ajan interventiojakson aikana, ennen päivittäistä harjoittelua
Tunnetilan (valenssi) ja aktivoitumisen arviointi (Russell et al., 1989) juuri ennen Dyad-aloittamista.
Korkeammat valenssi- ja aktivoitumispisteet osoittavat positiivisempaa affektia ja korkeampaa aktivoitumista.
Arvioitu 8 viikon ajan interventiojakson aikana, ennen päivittäistä harjoittelua
DPR-Emootiot
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu viikoittain viikosta 1 viikkoon 8, osana Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA) -arviointia
Tunneintensiteetit (esim. ilo, kiitollisuus, suru, viha), joita puhuja ja kuuntelija Dyadin jälkeen arvioivat suoraan Dyadin jälkeen.
Arvioitu viikoittain viikosta 1 viikkoon 8, osana Dyad Voice Assessment (DYVA) -arviointia
Emotion Acceptance (EAQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring emotional awareness, and acceptance of emotions (Beblo et al., 2011; Kisley et al., 2025). Higher scores indicate greater emotion awareness and acceptance.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Perceived Stress (PSS-4) (explanatory mechanism)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
A self-report questionnaire measuring the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Mind-Wandering (explanatory mechanism)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These two questions assess mind-wandering in day-to-day life (Smallwood et al., 2013). Lower rates indicate less mind-wandering.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
Weekly Thought Patterns (Cube of Thought) (explanatory mechanism)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
These three questions assess polarities of thought orientation or quality (self-other, past-future, pleasant-unpleasant) (Petzold et al. 2023). Higher scores indicate a higher level in each respective dimension.
Assessed weekly during the course of 8 weeks
DPR-involvement (explanatory mechanism)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of listening involvement (1 custom item; only post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more listening involvement.
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
DPR-Listening-Affect
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated affective state during listening to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a more positive affect.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad closeness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Assessment of how close participants felt to their Dyad partner (post-Dyad exercise). Higher scores indicate more closeness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen & Windmann, 2013).
Assessed for 8 weeks during intervention period, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise.
Dyad listening quality (DPR- listening-quality)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the quality of listening to the Dyad partner. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of active, attentive listening.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Dyad empathic and compassionate listening skills (DPR-listening-skills)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.
Custom items (self-generated) measuring the self-rated skill of listening empathically and compassionately to the Dyad partner's telling of the difficult situation and the event that they are grateful for. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of empathic or compassionate listening respectively.
Assessed weekly from week 1 to week 8, after the Dyad practice.

Muut tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Potilaan terveyskysely (PHQ-9; esiseulonta)
Aikaikkuna: Arvioitu ennen interventiota, vain kerran, seulomaan pois tutkimuksesta henkilöt, joilla on kliiniset masennusoireiden tasot
Masennusta arvioiva asteikko (Löwe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006). Korkeammat pisteet osoittavat enemmän masennusta.
Arvioitu ennen interventiota, vain kerran, seulomaan pois tutkimuksesta henkilöt, joilla on kliiniset masennusoireiden tasot
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; pre-screening)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
A scale assessing alexithymia (Bagby et al., 1994; Ritz & Kannapin, 2000). Higher scores indicate more alexithymia.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of alexithymia.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7; pre-screening)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
A scale assessing generalized anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006; Löwe et al., 2007). Higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Assessed prior to the intervention, only once, to pre-screen out from the study individuals who have clinical levels of anxious symptoms.
Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS; pre-screening)
Aikaikkuna: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
A self-report scale used to screen personality disorders (Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to pre-screen individuals' levels of personality disorders symptoms.
General demographic questions
Aikaikkuna: Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.
Self-generated demographic items.
Assessed before the intervention, only once, to collect demographic information.

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

Tutkijat

  • Päätutkija: Tania Singer, PhD, Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • Päätutkija: Philipp Beuchel, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society
  • Päätutkija: Ananda Zeas-Sigüenza, Ph.D., Social Neuroscience Lab | Max Planck Society

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Perjantai 28. elokuuta 2026

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Sunnuntai 20. joulukuuta 2026

Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Lauantai 3. huhtikuuta 2027

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Tiistai 26. toukokuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 4. kesäkuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Tiistai 9. kesäkuuta 2026

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Tiistai 15. syyskuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Perjantai 11. syyskuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Keskiviikko 1. huhtikuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • Edu:Social School Study 2

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

EI

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .