このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Fuyang Jiedu Granules Plus Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Immune Non-Responders With Spleen-Kidney Yang Deficiency (FYJD-INR-pRCT)

2026年7月7日 更新者：Mei Han、Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Fuyang Jiedu Granules Combined With Antiretroviral Therapy for Immune Reconstitution Failure in People With HIV and Spleen-Kidney Yang Deficiency Syndrome

This pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluates whether Fuyang Jiedu Granules combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART) improves immune reconstitution in people with HIV who meet criteria for immune reconstitution failure and spleen-kidney yang deficiency syndrome. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 60 years with HIV-1 infection, long-term viral suppression on ART, and persistently low CD4+ T-cell counts. A total of 240 participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive Fuyang Jiedu Granules plus ART or ART alone. Treatment lasts 48 weeks, followed by 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcomes are absolute CD4+ T-cell count and immune reconstitution response rate. Secondary outcomes include immune homeostasis markers, T-cell activation and Treg proportion, thymic output and inflammation-related markers, HIV RNA viral load, quality of life, clinical symptom scores, all-cause mortality, and safety.

調査の概要

状態

状態

現在の募集状況やアクセス拡大状況を示します。
まだ募集していません

条件

条件

研究されている疾患、障害、症候群、病気、またはけが。 ClinicalTrials.gov では、条件には、寿命、生活の質、健康上のリスクなど、他の健康関連の問題も含まれる場合があります。

介入・治療

介入・治療

臨床研究の焦点となるプロセスまたはアクション。介入には、医薬品、医療機器、処置、ワクチン、および治験中またはすでに利用可能なその他の製品が含まれます。介入には、教育や食事や運動の変更などの非侵襲的アプローチも含まれます。

詳細な説明

This is a prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants will be recruited from three HIV treatment-designated hospitals in high-prevalence regions in China. Eligible participants will be randomized by center-stratified block randomization at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental arm or control arm. Randomization codes will be generated using SAS by personnel independent from the clinical trial. The ART regimen is not restricted and follows applicable domestic and international ART guidelines. Clinical data will be collected using a unified CRF/eCRF and managed through an EDC platform with de-identified study codes and access controls.

研究の種類

研究の種類

臨床研究の性質について説明します。研究の種類には、介入研究 (臨床試験とも呼ばれます)、観察研究 (患者登録を含む)、および拡張アクセスが含まれます。
介入

入学 (推定)

入学

臨床試験の参加者数。 「予想される」登録は、研究者が研究に必要とする参加者の目標数です。
240

段階

段階

米国食品医薬品局 (FDA) によって開発された定義に基づく、医薬品または生物学的製品を研究する臨床試験の段階。フェーズは、研究の目的、参加者の数、およびその他の特性に基づいています。初期フェーズ 1 (以前はフェーズ 0 としてリストされていた)、フェーズ 1、フェーズ 2、フェーズ 3、およびフェーズ 4 の 5 つのフェーズがあります。該当なしは、デバイスまたは行動介入の治験を含む、FDA が定義したフェーズのない治験を説明するために使用されます。
  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先

臨床試験の登録に関する質問に回答できる担当者の名前と連絡先情報。研究が実施されている各場所には、これらの質問により適切に回答できる特定の連絡先がある場合もあります。

研究場所

  • 中国
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100029
        • Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • コンタクト：

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

適格基準

臨床研究への参加を希望する人々が満たさなければならない重要な要件、または彼らが持つべき特徴。適格基準は、包含基準 (人が研究に参加するために必要な基準) と除外基準 (人が研究に参加するのを妨げる基準) の両方で構成されます。適格基準のタイプには、研究が健康なボランティアを受け入れるかどうか、年齢または年齢グループの要件があるかどうか、または性別によって制限されるかどうかが含まれます。

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:Aged 18 to 60 years, male or female. CD4+ T lymphocyte count <350 cells/uL. Meets diagnostic criteria for HIV-1 infection according to the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2024 edition).

Meets diagnostic criteria for incomplete immune reconstitution: ART for more than 4 years; peripheral blood viral load below the lower limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) for more than 3 years; persistent CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/uL; and exclusion of other causes of long-term low CD4+ T-cell count.

Meets the Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic criteria for spleen-kidney yang deficiency syndrome, supported by the designated four-diagnostic instrument (model SZY-ZM-1) where applicable.

Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs informed consent. -

Exclusion Criteria:Uncontrolled acute or chronic physical or mental illness. Poor adherence to ART. WBC <2 x 10^9/L, neutrophils <1.0 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <90 g/L, platelets <75 x 10^9/L, or abnormal hepatic/renal function. Hepatic abnormality is defined as AST, ALT, or total bilirubin >=2 times the upper limit of normal; renal abnormality is defined as creatinine clearance below the normal value.

Other serious comorbid disease, such as tumor, cirrhosis, or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.

Pregnancy, lactation, or recent plan for pregnancy/childbearing. Use of immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within 6 months before screening. Any other condition judged by the investigator to make the participant unsuitable for the study.

-

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか？

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的：処理
  • 割り当て：ランダム化
  • 介入モデル：並列代入
  • マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム

参加者グループ / アーム

臨床試験のプロトコルに従って、特定の介入/治療を受ける、または介入を受けない、臨床試験の参加者のグループまたはサブグループ。
介入・治療

介入・治療

臨床研究の焦点となるプロセスまたはアクション。介入には、医薬品、医療機器、処置、ワクチン、および治験中またはすでに利用可能なその他の製品が含まれます。介入には、教育や食事や運動の変更などの非侵襲的アプローチも含まれます。
アクティブコンパレータ：ART alone
Participants continue ART according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines
薬：Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Background ART regimen according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines.
実験的：Fuyang Jiedu Granules plus ART
Participants receive Fuyang Jiedu Granules orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
薬：Fuyang Jiedu Granules
Fuyang Jiedu Granules are provided by Quantaitang Group Co., Ltd. (Chinese invention patent No. ZL201210251214.7). The main components include Polygonatum, Epimedium, deer antler, Codonopsis, Scutellaria baicalensis, Scutellaria barbata, and related components. Dose: 1 sachet (9 g) orally twice daily, 30 minutes after morning and evening meals, with warm water for 48 weeks.

この研究は何を測定していますか？

主要な結果の測定

主要な結果の測定

臨床研究のプロトコルにおいて、介入/治療の効果を評価するために最も重要な、計画された結果の尺度。ほとんどの臨床研究には 1 つの主要な結果の測定値がありますが、複数の測定値を持つものもあります。
結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
時間枠：Week 48.
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Week 48.
Immune reconstitution response rate
時間枠：Week 48.
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
Week 48.

二次結果の測定

二次結果の測定

臨床研究のプロトコルにおいて、介入の効果を評価するための主要な結果測定ほど重要ではないが、依然として重要な計画された結果測定。ほとんどの臨床研究には、複数の副次的アウトカム指標があります。
結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
CD4+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD8+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD8+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD45RO+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD45RO+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Treg proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in regulatory T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TRECs level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in T-cell receptor excision circles level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD3+ T-cell level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD3+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
CD31+ T-cell level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD31+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-2 level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-2 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-4 level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-4 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-6 level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-6 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-10 level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-10 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IL-17A level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interleukin-17A level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TNF-alpha level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
IFN-gamma level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in interferon-gamma level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
HIV RNA viral load
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in HIV RNA viral load, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Quality of life score
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in quality of life score assessed using the WHOQOL-HIV-BREF questionnaire, compared between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
TCM syndrome response rate
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Response is defined as a >=30% decrease in TCM syndrome score from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% decrease from baseline.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
All-cause mortality rate
時間枠：From randomization through Week 96.
Death from any cause during the study period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
From randomization through Week 96.
Red blood cell count
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in red blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
White blood cell count
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in white blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Hemoglobin level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in hemoglobin level as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Platelet count
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in platelet count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Absolute neutrophil count
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in absolute neutrophil count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Absolute lymphocyte count
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in absolute lymphocyte count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Aspartate aminotransferase level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in aspartate aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Alanine aminotransferase level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in alanine aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Gamma-glutamyl transferase level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Serum creatinine level
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in serum creatinine level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary red blood cell result
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary red blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary protein result
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary protein result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary white blood cell result
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary white blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Urinary glucose result
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Change in urinary glucose result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Incidence of adverse events
時間枠：Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of serious adverse events
時間枠：Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Incidence of serious adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
Treatment interruption rate
時間枠：Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
Proportion of participants with interruption of the assigned study treatment during the 48-week treatment period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
Concomitant medication use
時間枠：Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
Use of concomitant medications during the study period, including medication name, reason for use, dosage form, dose, route, frequency, start date, and end date.
Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
時間枠：Week 96
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Week 96
Immune reconstitution response rate
時間枠：Week 96
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
Week 96
CD45RA+ T-cell proportion
時間枠：Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period aUrinary red blood cell resultnd follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
Change in CD45RA+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period aUrinary red blood cell resultnd follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

スポンサー

研究を開始し、研究に対する権限と管理権を持つ組織または個人。
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

協力者

協力者

臨床研究を支援する治験依頼者以外の機関。このサポートには、資金調達、設計、実装、データ分析、またはレポートに関連する活動が含まれる場合があります。
Beijing YouAn Hospital
Capital Medical University
Chongqing Public Health Medical Center
Chengdu Public Health Clinical Center

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

  • 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 艾滋病免疫功能重建不全者临床诊疗专家共识（2023版）[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20230927-00098.
  • 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南（2024版）[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(6): 1261-1288. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0766.
  • 中华中医药学会防治艾滋病分会, 刘颖, 梁碧颜. 艾滋病中医诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2025, 31(9): 1029-1034. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2025.09.18

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

研究開始

最初の参加者が臨床試験に登録された実際の日付。 「予想される」研究開始日は、研究者が研究開始日になると考える日付です。
2026年8月1日

一次修了 (推定)

一次修了

臨床研究の最後の参加者が検査された、または主要な結果測定のための最終データを収集するための介入を受けた日付。治験がプロトコルに従って終了したか終了したかは、この日付には影響しません。完了日が異なる複数の主要評価項目を含む臨床研究の場合、この用語は、すべての主要評価項目のデータ収集が完了した日付を指します。 「予想される」一次完了日は、研究者がその研究の一次完了日になると考える日付です。
2028年2月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

研究の完了

臨床研究の最後の参加者が検査された、または介入/治療を受けて、主要な結果の尺度、副次的な結果の尺度、および有害事象の最終データを収集した日付 (つまり、最後の参加者の最後の訪問)。 「予想される」研究完了日は、研究者が研究完了日になると考える日付です。
2029年2月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

最初に提出

治験依頼者または治験責任医師が初めて治験記録を ClinicalTrials.gov に提出した日付。通常、最初の提出日と ClinicalTrials.gov での記録の利用可能日 (最初の投稿日) の間には数日の遅延があります。
2026年7月7日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

研究スポンサーまたは治験責任医師が、国立医学図書館 (NLM) の品質管理 (QC) 審査基準と一致する研究記録を最初に提出した日付。治験依頼者または研究者は、NLM の QC 審査基準が満たされるまでに、研究記録を 1 回または複数回修正して提出する必要がある場合があります。研究記録がNLM QC審査基準と一致していることを確認するのは、治験依頼者または治験責任医師の責任です。
2026年7月7日

最初の投稿 (実際)

最初の投稿

国立医学図書館 (NLM) の品質管理 (QC) レビューが終了した後、ClinicalTrials.gov で研究記録が最初に利用可能になった日付。通常、治験依頼者または治験責任医師が治験記録を提出した日と最初に投稿された日との間には数日の遅延があります。
2026年7月13日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

投稿された最後の更新

ClinicalTrials.gov で、研究記録が変更された最新の日付。研究のスポンサーまたは治験責任医師によって変更が ClinicalTrials.gov に提出されたとき (最終更新が提出された日) と最終更新が投稿された日との間に遅延が生じる場合があります。
2026年7月13日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

治験依頼者または治験責任医師が、国立医学図書館（NLM）の品質管理（QC）審査基準と一致する治験記録の変更を提出した最新の日付。研究記録がNLM QC審査基準と一致していることを確認するのは、治験依頼者または治験責任医師の責任です。
2026年7月7日

最終確認日

最終確認日

治験依頼者または治験責任医師が、ClinicalTrials.gov で臨床治験に関する情報が正確かつ最新であることを確認した最新の日付。募集ステータスが募集中の研究の場合。まだ募集していません。過去 2 年以内に募集が確認されていない場合、研究の募集状況は不明として表示されます。
2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

キーワード

追加の関連 MeSH 用語

その他の研究ID番号

その他の研究ID番号

NCT 番号以外の識別子または ID 番号で、治験依頼者、資金提供者、その他によって臨床治験に割り当てられたもの。これらの番号には、他の治験登録機関や国立衛生研究所の助成金番号からの一意の識別子が含まれる場合があります。
  • CTCM-HIV-INR-FYJD-2026

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

The clinical data will be de-identified, stored in an EDC system, and exported only after written approval by the principal investigator.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

クッキーの設定

当社はCookieを使用して、当社のWebサイトで最高のエクスペリエンスを提供できるようにしています。詳細については、プライバシーとCookieのポリシーをよくお読みください。...>>>ポリシーに記載されているように、WebサイトまたはコンピューターからCookieを削除することにより、いつでも設定を変更したり、同意を取り消すことができます。それを受け入れて、下の[設定の管理]セクションで対応するボックスにチェックマークを付けて、設定を選択してください。このウェブサイトの一部を使用する前に、利用規約をよくお読みください。
«設定の管理