Fuyang Jiedu Granules Plus Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Immune Non-Responders With Spleen-Kidney Yang Deficiency (FYJD-INR-pRCT)
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Fuyang Jiedu Granules Combined With Antiretroviral Therapy for Immune Reconstitution Failure in People With HIV and Spleen-Kidney Yang Deficiency Syndrome
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Tila
Ehdot
Ehdot
Interventio / Hoito
Interventio / Hoito
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
Opintotyyppi
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)
Ilmoittautuminen
Vaihe
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskeluyhteys
Opiskeluyhteys
- Nimi: Mei Han, phD
- Puhelinnumero: +86 13401131731
- Sähköposti: hanmeizoujin@163.com
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kiina, 100029
- Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
-
Ottaa yhteyttä:
- Mei Han, phD
- Puhelinnumero: +86 13401131731
- Sähköposti: hanmeizoujin@163.com
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
- Aikuinen
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:Aged 18 to 60 years, male or female. CD4+ T lymphocyte count <350 cells/uL. Meets diagnostic criteria for HIV-1 infection according to the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2024 edition).
Meets diagnostic criteria for incomplete immune reconstitution: ART for more than 4 years; peripheral blood viral load below the lower limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) for more than 3 years; persistent CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/uL; and exclusion of other causes of long-term low CD4+ T-cell count.
Meets the Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic criteria for spleen-kidney yang deficiency syndrome, supported by the designated four-diagnostic instrument (model SZY-ZM-1) where applicable.
Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs informed consent. -
Exclusion Criteria:Uncontrolled acute or chronic physical or mental illness. Poor adherence to ART. WBC <2 x 10^9/L, neutrophils <1.0 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <90 g/L, platelets <75 x 10^9/L, or abnormal hepatic/renal function. Hepatic abnormality is defined as AST, ALT, or total bilirubin >=2 times the upper limit of normal; renal abnormality is defined as creatinine clearance below the normal value.
Other serious comorbid disease, such as tumor, cirrhosis, or cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease.
Pregnancy, lactation, or recent plan for pregnancy/childbearing. Use of immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within 6 months before screening. Any other condition judged by the investigator to make the participant unsuitable for the study.
-
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
- Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)
Aseiden lukumäärä
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / ArmOsallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / HoitoInterventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: ART alone
Participants continue ART according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines
|
Background ART regimen according to applicable domestic and international ART guidelines.
|
|
Kokeellinen: Fuyang Jiedu Granules plus ART
Participants receive Fuyang Jiedu Granules orally in addition to their background ART regimen for 48 weeks.
|
Fuyang Jiedu Granules are provided by Quantaitang Group Co., Ltd.
(Chinese invention patent No. ZL201210251214.7).
The main components include Polygonatum, Epimedium, deer antler, Codonopsis, Scutellaria baicalensis, Scutellaria barbata, and related components.
Dose: 1 sachet (9 g) orally twice daily, 30 minutes after morning and evening meals, with warm water for 48 weeks.
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Aikaikkuna: Week 48.
|
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Week 48.
|
|
Immune reconstitution response rate
Aikaikkuna: Week 48.
|
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
|
Week 48.
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
CD4+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+/CD8+ ratio
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD8+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD8+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD45RO+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD45RO+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+CD28+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD4+CD38+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD38+/HLA-DR+ T-cell activation marker, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
Treg proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in regulatory T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TRECs level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in T-cell receptor excision circles level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD3+ T-cell level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD3+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
CD31+ T-cell level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD31+ T-cell level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-2 level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-2 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-4 level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-4 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-6 level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-6 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-10 level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-10 level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IL-17A level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interleukin-17A level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TNF-alpha level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
IFN-gamma level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in interferon-gamma level, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
HIV RNA viral load
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in HIV RNA viral load, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 48 and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
Quality of life score
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in quality of life score assessed using the WHOQOL-HIV-BREF questionnaire, compared between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 48, 60, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
TCM syndrome response rate
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Response is defined as a >=30% decrease in TCM syndrome score from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% decrease from baseline.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period and follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
|
All-cause mortality rate
Aikaikkuna: From randomization through Week 96.
|
Death from any cause during the study period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
From randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Red blood cell count
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in red blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
White blood cell count
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in white blood cell count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Hemoglobin level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in hemoglobin level as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Platelet count
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in platelet count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Absolute neutrophil count
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in absolute neutrophil count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Absolute lymphocyte count
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in absolute lymphocyte count as a blood routine safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Aspartate aminotransferase level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in aspartate aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Alanine aminotransferase level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in alanine aminotransferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Gamma-glutamyl transferase level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase level as a liver function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Serum creatinine level
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in serum creatinine level as a renal function safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary red blood cell result
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary red blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary protein result
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary protein result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary white blood cell result
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary white blood cell result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Urinary glucose result
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
Change in urinary glucose result as a urinalysis safety laboratory indicator, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, and 48 were observed. The safety laboratory assessments were Weeks 12, 24, and 48.
|
|
Incidence of adverse events
Aikaikkuna: Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
Incidence of adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Incidence of serious adverse events
Aikaikkuna: Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
Incidence of serious adverse events during the 48-week treatment period and the post-treatment follow-up period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Serious adverse events were monitored from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Treatment interruption rate
Aikaikkuna: Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
|
Proportion of participants with interruption of the assigned study treatment during the 48-week treatment period, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Treatment interruption was monitored from randomization through Week 48.
|
|
Concomitant medication use
Aikaikkuna: Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
|
Use of concomitant medications during the study period, including medication name, reason for use, dosage form, dose, route, frequency, start date, and end date.
|
Concomitant medication use was recorded from randomization through Week 96.
|
|
Absolute CD4+ T-cell count
Aikaikkuna: Week 96
|
Change in absolute CD4+ T-cell count, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Week 96
|
|
Immune reconstitution response rate
Aikaikkuna: Week 96
|
Response is defined as CD4+ T-cell count >350 cells/uL or a >=30% increase from baseline; non-response is defined as a <30% increase from baseline.
|
Week 96
|
|
CD45RA+ T-cell proportion
Aikaikkuna: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period aUrinary red blood cell resultnd follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Change in CD45RA+ T-cell proportion, assessed by comparison between the two randomized groups.
|
Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 78, and 96 were observed. The treatment-period aUrinary red blood cell resultnd follow-up assessments were Weeks 48 and 96.
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Sponsori
Yhteistyökumppanit
Yhteistyökumppanit
Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä
Yleiset julkaisut
- 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 艾滋病免疫功能重建不全者临床诊疗专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2024, 42(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20230927-00098.
- 中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(6): 1261-1288. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0766.
- 中华中医药学会防治艾滋病分会, 刘颖, 梁碧颜. 艾滋病中医诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2025, 31(9): 1029-1034. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2025.09.18
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Arvioitu)
Opiskelun aloitus
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen
Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintojen valmistuminen
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Avainsanat
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
- Veren välityksellä leviävät infektiot
- Urogenitaaliset sairaudet
- Sukuelinten sairaudet
- Immuunijärjestelmän sairaudet
- Infektiot
- RNA-virusinfektiot
- Virussairaudet
- Tartuntataudit
- Sukupuolitaudit, virus
- Sukupuolitaudit
- Lentivirus-infektiot
- Retroviridae-infektiot
- Immunologiset puutosoireyhtymät
- Hitaat virustaudit
- HIV-infektiot
- Immuunikato
- Terapeuttiset lääkkeet
- Lääkehoito
- Lääkehoito, yhdistelmä
- Antiretrovirushoito, erittäin aktiivinen
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- CTCM-HIV-INR-FYJD-2026
Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)
Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?
IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .