Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Patients in China
Adverse Events Among Hospitalized Patients: A Multicenter Evaluation of Four Detection Methods
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the incidence and characteristics of adverse events (AEs) among hospitalized patients in China and to compare 4 commonly used methods for detecting these events. The main questions it aims to answer are:
How common are AEs among hospitalized patients, and what are their characteristics (types, severity, and preventability) in China? How do 4 commonly used methods, including the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs), compare in detecting AEs? Researchers review randomly selected medical records from 5 hospitals in China to identify AEs, assess their type, severity, and preventability, and evaluate the performance of the 4 detection methods.
調査の概要
状態
状態
条件
条件
介入・治療
介入・治療
研究の種類
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
入学
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、100730
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥18 years and a length of stay of at least 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted primarily for psychiatric disorders, palliative care, or rehabilitation were excluded.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse event incidence
時間枠:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge.
|
The proportion of admissions with at least one adverse event.
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge.
|
二次結果の測定
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Types of adverse event
時間枠:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
|
|
Preventability of adverse event
時間枠:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
Adverse event with 6-point Likert scale scores ≥4 were considered preventable.
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
|
Severity of adverse events
時間枠:During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
Severity was graded using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) classification.
|
During the index admission, including review of relevant prior hospitalization records and all available records through 30 days after discharge
|
|
Sensitivity of adverse event detection methods
時間枠:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level sensitivity was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
|
Specificity of adverse event detection methods
時間枠:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level specificity was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
|
Positive predictive value (PPV) of adverse event detection methods
時間枠:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
|
Negative predictive value (NPV) of adverse event detection methods
時間枠:After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
Admission-level negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated for the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS), Global Trigger Tool (GTT), Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), and incident reporting systems (IRSs).
|
After completion of AE screening, adjudication, and re-review of randomly sampled screen-negative admissions
|
協力者と研究者
協力者
協力者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
一次修了
研究の完了 (推定)
研究の完了
試験登録日
最初に提出
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
最初の投稿
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
投稿された最後の更新
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
その他の研究ID番号
- I-25PJ1969
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。