このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Application of Meaning-Based Psychotherapy to a Sample of Patients With Chronic Pain (DOLORSENT)

2026年10月29日 更新者:Leyre Hidalgo Lopez、Hospital Clinico Universitario San Cecilio

APPLICATION OF MEANING-BASED PSYCHOTHERAPY TO A SAMPLE OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN

The aimes of this study is to determine whether Meaning-Based Psychotherapy (MBP) is an effective therapy for improving sense of purpose, reducing depression, and improving quality of life in people with chronic pain and to verify the effectiveness of the MBP intervention for participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) by comparing it with the optimized usual care (Cognitive-behavioural Psychotherapy por chronic pain).

調査の概要

状態

募集

条件

介入・治療

詳細な説明

Psychological interventions aimed at pain management arise from the need to provide a comprehensive treatment approach that addresses the multidimensional nature of the pain experience: sensory-discriminative, cognitive-evaluative, and affective-emotional dimensions. The goal of these interventions is to enable individuals with chronic pain to understand the factors that modulate their pain experience, to be able to live with and cope with its associated difficulties, and to strengthen their personal resources and coping skills.

Meaning-based psychotherapy (MBP) is designed to help people cope with unexpected or chronic adverse situations, so that participants can, despite their circumstances, build a fulfilling life. Recent studies on the effectiveness of MBP have found that it is effective in reducing depressive and anxious symptoms and increasing a sense of purpose in vulnerable individuals. Logotherapy and MBP are effective in improving meaning in life, spiritual well-being, and quality of life, as well as in reducing depression and anxiety in people with depression, people with complex grief, vulnerable individuals , people with cancer, and people with chronic illnesses. These results, along with those found in meta-analysis studies, suggest that MBP is effective in improving meaning in life, hope, optimism, self-efficacy, well-being, quality of life, and reducing stress

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

118

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

  • 名前:Jorge Alcazar Beltran, Clinical Psychologist
  • 電話番号:+34652196523
  • メール:jralcazar@gmail.com

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~70年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants will be adults;
  2. Patients treated at Mental Health Service for anxiety and depressive symptoms related to chronic non-cancer pain; the diagnosis will be recorded according to the ICD-10 criteria identified in their medical records.
  3. Tendency to catastrophize pain (score greater than 30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (García-Campayo, J., 2008));
  4. Low sense of purpose or lack of a defined sense of purpose in life (score less than 105 on the Purpose in Life Test (PIL) (Crumbaugh & Maholick, 1969).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnoses of a severe mental disorder (schizophrenia, substance dependence, dementia, or cognitive impairment) identified through information obtained in a clinical interview or digital health record.
  2. Severe suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt within the last 6 months. This will be assessed using responses to item 9 of the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). This item is commonly used in clinical studies to identify suicidal ideation and has proven to be a good predictor of suicidal intent and risk (Green et al. 2015, von Brachel et al. 2018). Participants with recent suicide attempts or whose response to item 3 ("I would commit suicide if I had the opportunity") will be excluded, as this indicates suicidal intent and a higher risk of suicide (Green et al. 2015). In such cases, referral to the appropriate mental health service will be prioritized according to protocol.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:独身

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Meaning Based Group Psychotherapy

Meaning-Based Psychotherapy (MBP) Protocol. The intervention consists of 10 modules of treatment defined in 15 sessions held over 4 months, in a group format of two hours each, on a weekly basis

Module 1: Introduction to MBP. Acquired illnesses and the loss of meaning in life. How can we develop a low sense of purpose in life? Module 2: Psychoeducation on MBP. Module 3: Human experiences occur in three dimensions: biological, psychological, and the noetic/meaning dimension. Sources of meaning.

Module 4: Creative sources of meaning and experiential sources of meaning. Module 5: The noetic/meaning dimension is the compass of our life. Module 6: Sources of attitudinal meaning. Transforming an unexpected situation into a personal triumph.

Module 7: Responsibility as a source of meaning. Module 8: The past is a potential source of enduring meaning. Module 9: The capacity for self-transcendence Module 10: Development and processing of your book of Life.

アクティブコンパレータ:Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for pain will be applied, including: psychoeducational content, training in emotional regulation strategies, attention and relaxation exercises, and problem and conflict resolution. 10 modules will be implemented over 15 sessions following Kovacs and Moix Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Chronic Pain

Module 1: Understanding the multidimensional experience of pain Module 2: Identifying emotions and aspects related to pain I Module 3: Identifying emotions and aspects related to pain II Module 4: Emotional regulation strategies Module 5: Cognitive restructuring and flexibility Module 6: Mindfulness exercises Module 7: Participation in graded activities Module 8: Interpersonal Problem and Conflict Resolution Module 9: Relaxation Exercises Module 10: Relapse Prevention

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Beck Depression Inventory
時間枠:Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1996), consisting of 21 items with four response options (0-4), assesses depressive symptoms. It establishes different quantitative ranges of depression: absent or minimal depression (< 13), mild to moderate depression (14-19), moderate depression (20-28), and severe depression (>28). We will use the Spanish version (Sanz et al., 2005), which has adequate reliability (α = .93). It includes two subscales: a cognitive-affective subscale and a somatic-motivational subscale.

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up
Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ)
時間枠:Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

The MLQ is a self-reported questionnaire made up of 10 items, and it was developed to assess the two main dimensions of meaning in life: presence and search for meaning in life. The items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (absolutely false) to 7 (absolutely true). The factors of Presence and Search were correlated (r = -.19), and internal consistency was good for Presence (.86) and Search (.87). One-month test-retest reliability coefficients were .70 for Presence and .73 for Search.

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up
The Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale (MEMS)
時間枠:Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 6-month follow up

The MEMS assesses the dimensions of meaning in life: Understanding, Purpose, and Significance, with a total of 15 items. Likert-type responses are given on a 7-point scale (1 = Strongly disagree; 7 = Strongly agree). We will use the Spanish version (Marco et al., 2022), where the three MEMS subscales showed adequate internal consistency: Understanding (ϖ = .91), Purpose (ϖ = .92), and Significance (ϖ = .86).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 6-month follow up
Purpose In Life (PIL)
時間枠:[Time Frame: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up

In this study, we used Part A of the PIL, which consists of 20 items with a Likert-type scale (1 to 7). It provides a measure of the level of achievement of meaning in life. Items include: "Life seems completely boring to me," with a Likert-type response (ranging from "1 = completely routine" to "7 = always exciting"). Scores range from 20 to 140 points, with three levels: scores below 90 indicate a level of existential emptiness, scores between 90 and 105 indicate a level of uncertainty regarding the meaning of life, and scores above 105 indicate a level of achievement of meaning. We used the Spanish version (Noblejas de la Flor, 2000), which has adequate reliability (α = .88).

[Time Frame: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
時間枠:Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up

Validation of the Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in fibromyalgia. Medicina Clínica, 131(13), 487-492. It measures the tendency to have exaggerated negative thoughts about pain, such as ruminating about suffering or feeling hopeless. It consists of 13 items grouped into three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. It is useful for predicting pain intensity, disability, and response to treatment. A validated Spanish version exists for patients with fibromyalgia and chronic pain with a reliability of (α = 0.79).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)
時間枠:Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

The OASIS is a five-item instrument that assesses the frequency and intensity of anxiety symptoms during the past week. In addition, it measures interference in work and academic, social, and daily life domains, as well as avoidance behaviors. The items are rated on a Likert-type scale (0-4). The psychometric properties are good in terms of internal consistency (α= 0.86), convergent and discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change (α= 0.86).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
時間枠:Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

Validation of the Spanish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-37). It assesses acceptance of chronic pain, including willingness to experience pain and maintain activities. It measures behavioral flexibility and functional adaptation to pain. Higher levels of acceptance have been shown to be associated with less depression and better functioning. It is available in a Spanish version, including a short, 8-item version with adequate reliability (α = 0.83).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

協力者

捜査官

  • スタディディレクター:Heliodoro Marco Salvador, Ph.D、University of Valencia
  • スタディディレクター:Soledad Quero Castellano, Ph.D、University Jaume I

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2025年7月10日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年2月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年5月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年10月29日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年10月29日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年11月4日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年10月29日

最終確認日

2026年2月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • SICEIA-2025-002883

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。