이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Application of Meaning-Based Psychotherapy to a Sample of Patients With Chronic Pain (DOLORSENT)

2026년 10월 29일 업데이트: Leyre Hidalgo Lopez, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Cecilio

APPLICATION OF MEANING-BASED PSYCHOTHERAPY TO A SAMPLE OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN

The aimes of this study is to determine whether Meaning-Based Psychotherapy (MBP) is an effective therapy for improving sense of purpose, reducing depression, and improving quality of life in people with chronic pain and to verify the effectiveness of the MBP intervention for participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) by comparing it with the optimized usual care (Cognitive-behavioural Psychotherapy por chronic pain).

연구 개요

상태

모병

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Psychological interventions aimed at pain management arise from the need to provide a comprehensive treatment approach that addresses the multidimensional nature of the pain experience: sensory-discriminative, cognitive-evaluative, and affective-emotional dimensions. The goal of these interventions is to enable individuals with chronic pain to understand the factors that modulate their pain experience, to be able to live with and cope with its associated difficulties, and to strengthen their personal resources and coping skills.

Meaning-based psychotherapy (MBP) is designed to help people cope with unexpected or chronic adverse situations, so that participants can, despite their circumstances, build a fulfilling life. Recent studies on the effectiveness of MBP have found that it is effective in reducing depressive and anxious symptoms and increasing a sense of purpose in vulnerable individuals. Logotherapy and MBP are effective in improving meaning in life, spiritual well-being, and quality of life, as well as in reducing depression and anxiety in people with depression, people with complex grief, vulnerable individuals , people with cancer, and people with chronic illnesses. These results, along with those found in meta-analysis studies, suggest that MBP is effective in improving meaning in life, hope, optimism, self-efficacy, well-being, quality of life, and reducing stress

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

118

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

  • 이름: Jorge Alcazar Beltran, Clinical Psychologist
  • 전화번호: +34652196523
  • 이메일: jralcazar@gmail.com

연구 장소

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants will be adults;
  2. Patients treated at Mental Health Service for anxiety and depressive symptoms related to chronic non-cancer pain; the diagnosis will be recorded according to the ICD-10 criteria identified in their medical records.
  3. Tendency to catastrophize pain (score greater than 30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (García-Campayo, J., 2008));
  4. Low sense of purpose or lack of a defined sense of purpose in life (score less than 105 on the Purpose in Life Test (PIL) (Crumbaugh & Maholick, 1969).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnoses of a severe mental disorder (schizophrenia, substance dependence, dementia, or cognitive impairment) identified through information obtained in a clinical interview or digital health record.
  2. Severe suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt within the last 6 months. This will be assessed using responses to item 9 of the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). This item is commonly used in clinical studies to identify suicidal ideation and has proven to be a good predictor of suicidal intent and risk (Green et al. 2015, von Brachel et al. 2018). Participants with recent suicide attempts or whose response to item 3 ("I would commit suicide if I had the opportunity") will be excluded, as this indicates suicidal intent and a higher risk of suicide (Green et al. 2015). In such cases, referral to the appropriate mental health service will be prioritized according to protocol.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Meaning Based Group Psychotherapy

Meaning-Based Psychotherapy (MBP) Protocol. The intervention consists of 10 modules of treatment defined in 15 sessions held over 4 months, in a group format of two hours each, on a weekly basis

Module 1: Introduction to MBP. Acquired illnesses and the loss of meaning in life. How can we develop a low sense of purpose in life? Module 2: Psychoeducation on MBP. Module 3: Human experiences occur in three dimensions: biological, psychological, and the noetic/meaning dimension. Sources of meaning.

Module 4: Creative sources of meaning and experiential sources of meaning. Module 5: The noetic/meaning dimension is the compass of our life. Module 6: Sources of attitudinal meaning. Transforming an unexpected situation into a personal triumph.

Module 7: Responsibility as a source of meaning. Module 8: The past is a potential source of enduring meaning. Module 9: The capacity for self-transcendence Module 10: Development and processing of your book of Life.

활성 비교기: Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for pain will be applied, including: psychoeducational content, training in emotional regulation strategies, attention and relaxation exercises, and problem and conflict resolution. 10 modules will be implemented over 15 sessions following Kovacs and Moix Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Chronic Pain

Module 1: Understanding the multidimensional experience of pain Module 2: Identifying emotions and aspects related to pain I Module 3: Identifying emotions and aspects related to pain II Module 4: Emotional regulation strategies Module 5: Cognitive restructuring and flexibility Module 6: Mindfulness exercises Module 7: Participation in graded activities Module 8: Interpersonal Problem and Conflict Resolution Module 9: Relaxation Exercises Module 10: Relapse Prevention

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Beck Depression Inventory
기간: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1996), consisting of 21 items with four response options (0-4), assesses depressive symptoms. It establishes different quantitative ranges of depression: absent or minimal depression (< 13), mild to moderate depression (14-19), moderate depression (20-28), and severe depression (>28). We will use the Spanish version (Sanz et al., 2005), which has adequate reliability (α = .93). It includes two subscales: a cognitive-affective subscale and a somatic-motivational subscale.

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up
Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ)
기간: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

The MLQ is a self-reported questionnaire made up of 10 items, and it was developed to assess the two main dimensions of meaning in life: presence and search for meaning in life. The items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (absolutely false) to 7 (absolutely true). The factors of Presence and Search were correlated (r = -.19), and internal consistency was good for Presence (.86) and Search (.87). One-month test-retest reliability coefficients were .70 for Presence and .73 for Search.

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up
The Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale (MEMS)
기간: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 6-month follow up

The MEMS assesses the dimensions of meaning in life: Understanding, Purpose, and Significance, with a total of 15 items. Likert-type responses are given on a 7-point scale (1 = Strongly disagree; 7 = Strongly agree). We will use the Spanish version (Marco et al., 2022), where the three MEMS subscales showed adequate internal consistency: Understanding (ϖ = .91), Purpose (ϖ = .92), and Significance (ϖ = .86).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 6-month follow up
Purpose In Life (PIL)
기간: [Time Frame: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up

In this study, we used Part A of the PIL, which consists of 20 items with a Likert-type scale (1 to 7). It provides a measure of the level of achievement of meaning in life. Items include: "Life seems completely boring to me," with a Likert-type response (ranging from "1 = completely routine" to "7 = always exciting"). Scores range from 20 to 140 points, with three levels: scores below 90 indicate a level of existential emptiness, scores between 90 and 105 indicate a level of uncertainty regarding the meaning of life, and scores above 105 indicate a level of achievement of meaning. We used the Spanish version (Noblejas de la Flor, 2000), which has adequate reliability (α = .88).

[Time Frame: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
기간: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up

Validation of the Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in fibromyalgia. Medicina Clínica, 131(13), 487-492. It measures the tendency to have exaggerated negative thoughts about pain, such as ruminating about suffering or feeling hopeless. It consists of 13 items grouped into three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. It is useful for predicting pain intensity, disability, and response to treatment. A validated Spanish version exists for patients with fibromyalgia and chronic pain with a reliability of (α = 0.79).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow up

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS)
기간: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

The OASIS is a five-item instrument that assesses the frequency and intensity of anxiety symptoms during the past week. In addition, it measures interference in work and academic, social, and daily life domains, as well as avoidance behaviors. The items are rated on a Likert-type scale (0-4). The psychometric properties are good in terms of internal consistency (α= 0.86), convergent and discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change (α= 0.86).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
기간: Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

Validation of the Spanish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-37). It assesses acceptance of chronic pain, including willingness to experience pain and maintain activities. It measures behavioral flexibility and functional adaptation to pain. Higher levels of acceptance have been shown to be associated with less depression and better functioning. It is available in a Spanish version, including a short, 8-item version with adequate reliability (α = 0.83).

Changes will be assessed from pre-treatment to immediately after the intervention, and also at 3-month follow-up

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

협력자

수사관

  • 연구 책임자: Heliodoro Marco Salvador, Ph.D, University of Valencia
  • 연구 책임자: Soledad Quero Castellano, Ph.D, University Jaume I

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2025년 7월 10일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2028년 2월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2028년 5월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 10월 29일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 10월 29일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 4일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 4일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 10월 29일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 2월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • SICEIA-2025-002883

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .