がん患者のための統合された実用的な老化評価のパイロット
Aging is the greatest risk factor for cancer incidence and mortality. Geriatric screening is recommended to help with treatment discussions, inform intensity of treatment, and identify supportive care needs. Despite a strong evidence base, geriatric assessments are not implemented routinely in oncologic clinics. Similarly, important information on social determinants of health, mental health, and health behaviors are inconsistently assessed, and almost never in an integrated fashion. In an effort to support clinicians delivering the recommended goal-concordant care, the investigators will integrate assessment of geriatric issues, health behaviors, mental health, and social determinants of health into an efficient, actionable contextual assessment system for older cancer patients called Integrated Aging Assessment for Action for Cancer Patients (IA3-CP). The investigators will use D&I strategies including co-creation engagement approaches and form-function methods to develop workflow processes that feasibly integrate the IA3-CP into usual initial assessment with the oncology team. Our objective is to develop and conduct a randomized pilot of the IA3-CP system and hypothesize that our results will show it can be implemented consistently, acted on, improve quality of care, and enhance patient-provider interactions.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Aging is the greatest risk factor for cancer incidence and mortality. Strong data and expert recommendations support the use of geriatric screening assessments to guide treatment for older adults (>65 years old). Geriatric assessment findings can help in treatment discussions, inform intensity of treatment, and identify supportive care needs. Yet, despite evidenced-based benefits, geriatric assessments are not implemented routinely in oncologic clinics. Similarly, there are strong data and expert recommendations for assessment of social determinants of health (SDoH) and health behaviors, but consistent assessment and action on SDoH and health behaviors is infrequent. Clinicians aiming to deliver recommended goal-concordant care to older patients - which is informed by a patient's frailty, SDoH, health behaviors, and mental health - must act without this important contextual information.
We have identified a pragmatic geriatric screening tool (the G8) and adapted it to a validated patient-reported measure. We aim to integrate the novel, validated, patient reported G8 with the NCI funded, theory driven, evidence-based My Own Health Report (MOHR) system that captures patient reported health behavior, mental health, and social determinants of health (SDoH) through a web-based portal. We will integrate assessment of geriatric issues, health behaviors, mental health, and SDoH into an efficient, actionable contextual assessment system for older cancer patients called Integrated Aging Assessment for Action for Cancer Patients (IA3-CP). We will use D&I strategies including co-creation engagement approaches and form-function methods to develop workflow processes that feasibly integrate the IA3-CP into usual initial assessment with the oncology team. Our objective is to develop and conduct a randomized pilot of the IA3-CP system to determine if it can be implemented consistently, acted on, improve quality of care, and enhance patient-provider interactions.
RATIONALE:
The phrase "you have cancer" lands differently with older patients than it does those younger. The issues of frailty, comorbidity, mental and behavioral health, and SDoH are critical to formulating a personalized cancer treatment approach with an older person as they can't put these conditions "on hold" to focus on a cancer diagnosis. Aging is the greatest risk factor for cancer incidence and mortality, with nearly half of all cancers diagnosed after age 65. There is a clear need to create patient-centered care plans that align care that is medically feasible and aligned with individual patient needs, environment, and preferences.
Geriatric screening and assessment is broadly recommended for the care of older persons with cancer. Similarly, there is strong consensus that SDoH (e.g., food scarcity, medical affordability, safe environments) and health behaviors are key drivers of health disparities. Validated, pragmatic patient-report measures of geriatric issues, health behaviors, and SDoH exist but are seldom consistently assessed in clinical practice, hardly ever in an integrated fashion, and even less seldom acted on. Clinics need efficient, cost-effective tools to screen for and address multiple risks at the same time - technology can provide important efficiencies.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Using age as a primary determinant for cancer treatment puts older adults at risk of under- or over-treatment of cancer. Failure to implement available tools that enhance our ability to tailor care planning to the unique needs of older adults represents a critical gap in patient-centered care.
Implementation of geriatric-specific measures: Oncologists recognize functional assessment as a predictor of future morbidity and mortality risk, so much so that it largely dictates oncology treatment selection, yet are using measures insensitive in an older population. Oncologists will often use clinical gestalt to recommend modified variants of standard treatment. An integrated assessment system can provide actionable, more comprehensive personalized data to the patient and care team.
Geriatric 8: The G8 is a brief geriatric assessment tool that has been broadly validated in the oncology setting to screen for potential frailty and need for a comprehensive assessment. It incorporates functional status, cognition and mental health, and nutritional feedback to form a clinic collected 8-item assessment. To address identified barriers to implementation, the investigators adapted the G8 with input from our Rural Cancer Advisory Board to a patient-reported version. The investigators then pilot tested implementation and validity of the modified G8 in seven clinical environments - primary care and oncology in community and academic settings with excellent results. In parallel, the investigators devised a way to integrate the patient-reported items into the UCHealth EHR for use in clinical care and documentation. The investigators now propose to use similar strategies to integrate the IA3-CP into the EHR.
My Own Health Report (MOHR): MOHR is a patient-centered, web-based health risk assessment and feedback system for unhealthy behaviors, mental health status, and prioritizing patient concerns. MOHR has been used successfully in numerous primary care environments and its use has been found to result in patients feeling more cared for by their clinical team. Our randomized trial found that patients receiving MOHR improved physical activity (p < 0.001) and dietary behaviors (p < 0.001) that increase the risk for many oncology toxicities and significantly increased goal setting during primary care visits. The investigators have recently adapted MOHR to include SDoH such as transportation, food access, medication affordability, safety at home, housing, and financial stability. Much like the geriatric screen, MOHR provides information on health behaviors that may be at risk, especially in an older population more likely to face comorbid conditions.
This proposal will integrate our evidence-based health risk assessment (MOHR) with a geriatric health screener (G8) to assess and address the needs of older adults with cancer. Key challenges to assessment of SDoH and cancer risks are the nonsystematic and separate, non-integrated way these assessments are conducted and the limited time in clinic visits to identify risks, and tailor treatment and goal setting to patient context and priorities. When patients complete our MOHR web-based system, actionable information on health risks and SDoH along with patients' priorities provides for more informed and efficient patient-clinician interactions. This is an example of how well-designed, contextually-appropriate technology developed with patients and clinicians can provide important efficiencies to address clinical and implementation challenges.
In combining the extensive preliminary work in designing the modified G8 and the demonstrated success of the MOHR automated assessment and feedback system with the clinical and methodologic expertise of our team, the investigators are positioned to successfully pilot the IA3-CP in the UCCC. This proposal addresses a clear gap in the needs of older cancer patients and clinical teams and will lead to many future collaborations including a UG3/UH3 MPI pragmatic trial submission.
INNOVATION:
Our proposed feasibility pilot will accelerate the implementation of patient-reported measures to inform care planning for the diverse and at-risk population of older adults with cancer. It will also advance transdisciplinary cancer research by demonstrating integration of multiple risk issues in a pragmatic fashion using innovative D&I science and engagement methods.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora、Colorado、アメリカ、80045
- University of Colorado Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > /= 65
- Patient must agree to participate in all study-related activities
- English or Spanish speaking
- Attending initial visit to oncology
Exclusion criteria
- age < 65
- primary language other than English or Spanish
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:IA3-CP with SDoH
Assess IA3-CP with SDoH and provide feedback (provider & patient) |
Each patient randomly assigned to IA3-CP with SDoH study arm will complete a pre-visit assessment tool including SDoH. Feedback is provided to provider and patient. |
|
実験的:IA3-CP only
Assess IA3-CP only without added SDoH and provide feedback (provider & patient) |
Each patient randomly assigned to IA3-CP only study arm will complete a pre-visit assessment tool excluding SDoH. Feedback is provided to provider and patient. |
|
介入なし:Control - usual care
Usual care: Assess IA3-CP without providing the feedback report |
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient reported receipt of quality illness care
時間枠:12 weeks
|
Measured by the Patient Assessment of Chronic illness Care (PACIC). The score ranges from 1-5 where higher scores mean a better outcome |
12 weeks
|
|
Number of referrals made and completed for geriatric, health behavior and SDoH issues
時間枠:16 weeks
|
Measured by data abstraction from EHR |
16 weeks
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Discussion of IA3-CP related issues in oncologist-patient encounter
時間枠:7 months
|
Measured by checklist adapted from the Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS) completed from recorded observation of patient-oncologist meeting |
7 months
|
|
Oncologist utility
時間枠:7 months
|
Did IA3-CP change your care plan? (yes/no) How helpful was it? (6 pt. scale) |
7 months
|
|
Proportion of patients that use IA3-CP screening tool
時間枠:7 months
|
Measured by clinic leadership report & observation |
7 months
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Russell E Glasgow、University of Colorado, Denver
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
- 泌尿生殖器疾患
- 生殖器疾患
- 血管疾患
- 心血管疾患
- 性器腫瘍、男性
- 泌尿生殖器腫瘍
- 部位別新生物
- 新生物
- 生殖器疾患、男性
- 前立腺疾患
- 男性の泌尿生殖器疾患
- 腎臓病
- 泌尿器疾患
- 女性の泌尿生殖器疾患
- 女性の泌尿生殖器疾患と妊娠合併症
- 免疫系疾患
- 組織型別の新生物
- 血液疾患
- 皮膚疾患
- 乳房の病気
- リンパ疾患
- リンパ増殖性疾患
- 免疫増殖性疾患
- 泌尿器科の新生物
- リンパ腫
- 新生物、形質細胞
- 止血障害
- パラタンパク血症
- 血液タンパク質障害
- 出血性疾患
- 膀胱疾患
- 白血病、骨髄性、急性
- 皮膚および結合組織疾患
- ヘミックおよびリンパ疾患
- 前立腺腫瘍
- 白血病
- 白血病、骨髄性
- 乳房腫瘍
- 白血病、リンパ
- 多発性骨髄腫
- ホジキン病
- 膀胱腫瘍
- 腎腫瘍
- 白血病、単球性、急性
- 人口特性
- 健康状態
- 人口統計
- 健康
- 健康の社会的決定要因
その他の研究ID番号
- 23-0440.cc
- P50CA244688 (米国 NIH グラント/契約)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。