このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Individualized Versus Non-Individualized Resistance Training

2026年11月5日 更新者:Christophe Delecluse、Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

加齢に伴う筋力と機能的能力の低下を防ぐためのオーダーメイドの介入

Preserving functional ability is crucial for healthy aging. Unfortunately, age-related decreases in muscle power often lead to declines in functional ability. As power is the product of force and velocity, decreases in power can originate from changes in muscle force, contraction velocity, or both, varying between individuals. The primary method to prevent functional disability is power-based resistance training. Although training interventions are effective for most older adults, they do not induce substantial improvements in a subset of the population. These inconsistent outcomes may arise from neglecting the observed differences in the force-velocity (F-V) profiles between individuals. Therefore, this study provides a novel approach to resistance exercise, in which exercise dose is tailored according to the individual's F-V profile. The effectiveness of the tailored method will be assessed in a randomized control trial, comparing the effects of an individualized and a non-individualized 12-week training intervention on muscle power parameters and functional ability.

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

80

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Vlaams-Brabant
      • Leuven、Vlaams-Brabant、ベルギー、3000
        • KU Leuven - Department of Movement Sciences

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

65年歳以上 (高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling adults
  • At least 65 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systematic engagement in resistance exercise during the past year
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease, neuromuscular disease, acute infection or fever
  • Recent surgery
  • Lower-extremity injuries
  • Low levels of functional ability (i.e., SPPB score ≤ 9)
  • Cognitive malfunctioning (i.e., Mini-Mental State Examination < 24)

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Individualized resistance exercise program

Individualized exercise dose. All individuals perform resistance exercises at a load that targets their deficit. Individuals with a velocity deficit train at low loads while individuals with a force deficit train at high loads.

2x/week, 35-45 min sessions, on leg press machine

アクティブコンパレータ:Non-individualized resistance exercise program

Non-individualized exercise dose. All individuals perform resistance exercises at a load that does not target their deficit. Individuals with a velocity deficit train at high loads while individuals with a force deficit train at low loads.

2x/week, 35-45 min sessions, on leg press machine

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Maximal power (Pmax)
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

Participants performed explosive unilateral leg extensions with the dominant leg at five submaximal loads on a pneumatic leg press (Leg Press Air 400, Keiser, USA). Submaximal loads were scaled to the estimated maximal isometric force derived from the familiarization session. The three lighter loads were performed three times each and the two heavier loads twice, with the repetition yielding the highest mean concentric velocity retained for analysis. Participants subsequently performed single repetitions at incrementally increasing loads until 1-RM was reached. Rest intervals were adjusted according to the load of the preceding trial: 60 s after the three lightest loads, 90 s after the two heavier loads, and 120 s during the incremental trials leading to 1-RM. For each load, the mean concentric velocity of the best trial was used to establish the individual force-velocity (F-V) relationship using linear regression, from which the maximal power (Pmax; W) was estimated.

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Maximal isometric force (F0)
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

Participants performed explosive unilateral leg extensions with the dominant leg at five submaximal loads on a pneumatic leg press (Leg Press Air 400, Keiser, USA). Submaximal loads were scaled to the estimated maximal isometric force derived from the familiarization session. The three lighter loads were performed three times each and the two heavier loads twice, with the repetition yielding the highest mean concentric velocity retained for analysis. Participants subsequently performed single repetitions at incrementally increasing loads until 1-RM was reached. Rest intervals were adjusted according to the load of the preceding trial: 60 s after the three lightest loads, 90 s after the two heavier loads, and 120 s during the incremental trials leading to 1-RM. For each load, the mean concentric velocity of the best trial was used to establish the individual force-velocity (F-V) relationship using linear regression, from which maximal isometric force (F0; N) was estimated.

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Maximal unloaded velocity (V0)
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

Participants performed explosive unilateral leg extensions with the dominant leg at five submaximal loads on a pneumatic leg press (Leg Press Air 400, Keiser, USA). Submaximal loads were scaled to the estimated maximal isometric force derived from the familiarization session. The three lighter loads were performed three times each and the two heavier loads twice, with the repetition yielding the highest mean concentric velocity retained for analysis. Participants subsequently performed single repetitions at incrementally increasing loads until 1-RM was reached. Rest intervals were adjusted according to the load of the preceding trial: 60 s after the three lightest loads, 90 s after the two heavier loads, and 120 s during the incremental trials leading to 1-RM. For each load, the mean concentric velocity of the best trial was used to establish the individual force-velocity (F-V) relationship using linear regression, from which maximal unloaded velocity (V0; m/s) was estimated.

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Force-velocity slope
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

Participants performed explosive unilateral leg extensions with the dominant leg at five submaximal loads on a pneumatic leg press (Leg Press Air 400, Keiser, USA). Submaximal loads were scaled to the estimated maximal isometric force derived from the familiarization session. The three lighter loads were performed three times each and the two heavier loads twice, with the repetition yielding the highest mean concentric velocity retained for analysis. Participants subsequently performed single repetitions at incrementally increasing loads until 1-RM was reached. Rest intervals were adjusted according to the load of the preceding trial: 60 s after the three lightest loads, 90 s after the two heavier loads, and 120 s during the incremental trials leading to 1-RM. For each load, the mean concentric velocity of the best trial was used to establish the individual force-velocity (F-V) relationship using linear regression, from which the F-V slope (Ns/m) was derived.

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
時間枠:Score at baseline

Total score on the SPPB (min 0, max 12, higher scores indicate better performance)

Score at baseline
Hand grip strength
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

Maximal grip strength (kg) of the dominant hand using an isometric dynamometer adjusted for hand size

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Maximal gait speed
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The average time (s) to walk 10m as fast as possible

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Countermovement jump
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The jump height (mm) in a countermovement jump

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Timed up-and-go
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The time (s) needed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 m, turn, walk back and sit down again as fast as possible

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
5-repetition sit-to-stand time
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The time (s) needed to complete the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
5-repetition sit-to-stand power
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The average power (watt) produced during the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
30-second sit-to-stand repetitions
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The number of repetitions completed during the 30-second sit-to-stand test

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
30-second sit-to-stand power
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The average power (watt) produced during the 30-second sit-to-stand test

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Stair ascent time
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The time (s) needed to ascend a flight of stairs

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Stair ascent power
時間枠:Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks

The average power (Watt) produced during the stair ascent test

Change from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks
Exercise adherence
時間枠:Total adherence over 12-week period

Number of sessions attended as a percentage of total sessions planned

Total adherence over 12-week period
Absolute training load
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The absolute load (kg) used during training sessions

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Relative training load
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The relative load (%1RM) used during training sessions

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Number of repetitions
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The number of repetitions (n) completed per set

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Highest movement velocity within a set
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The velocity (m/s) of the fastest repetition in a set (Vmax)

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Lowest movement velocity within a set
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The velocity (m/s) of the slowest repetition in a set (Vmin)

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Velocity loss
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The percentage difference between the highest and lowest movement velocity in a set = ([Vmax - Vmin] / Vmax) × 100

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Set-volume index
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The number of repetitions × relative load (%1-RM) per set

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention
Session-volume index
時間枠:Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

The sum of set volumes per session

Consistently recorded throughout the 12-week intervention

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2024年5月20日

一次修了 (実際)

2025年12月4日

研究の完了 (実際)

2025年12月4日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2024年3月5日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2024年6月5日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2024年6月10日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月6日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月5日

最終確認日

2026年11月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • S68434

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する