インターネットを介して提供される感情障害に対する個別の反応に基づいた診断介入の有効性：適応試験のためのプロトコル

実験的：初期のレスポンダーは自己適用されました

行動：Ujiオンライン診断プロトコル

インタラクティブなマルチメディアプラットフォームを介して提供される感情障害の手動治療です。 自己適用形式は、12の自己応用モジュール（精神教育、感情処理、認知柔軟性トレーニング、露出、対処戦略、不適応行動、回避など）で構成されています。

実験的：早期の応答者の自己申請者は中断されました

行動：Ujiオンライン診断プロトコル

インタラクティブなマルチメディアプラットフォームを介して提供される感情障害の手動治療です。 自己適用形式は、12の自己応用モジュール（精神教育、感情処理、認知柔軟性トレーニング、露出、対処戦略、不適応行動、回避など）で構成されています。

実験的：遅いレスポンダーは自己適用されました

行動：Ujiオンライン診断プロトコル

インタラクティブなマルチメディアプラットフォームを介して提供される感情障害の手動治療です。 自己適用形式は、12の自己応用モジュール（精神教育、感情処理、認知柔軟性トレーニング、露出、対処戦略、不適応行動、回避など）で構成されています。

実験的：遅いレスポンダーがブレンドされました

行動：UJI On Line Transdiagnostic Hibrid Protocol

Hybrid format: 12 self applied modules with two synchronous videoconference sessions with a trained therapist

Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-34, Evans et al., 2002)

Is a self report questionnaire designed to assess psychological distress and global functioning across four domains: subjective well being, problems/symptoms, functioning and risk. Items are rated on a 5 point Likert scale. The instrument has demostrated good psychometrics properties. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.

Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10 (CORE 10, Barkham et al., 2013)

Is a Self-report 10-items questionnaire with 5 Likert response options. Assess general distress. Validated for Spanish speaking population with adequate internal consistency, convergent validity and sensitivity to change.

Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS, Gratz & Roemer, 2004)

Self- report 28-items questionnaire with 5 Likert response options. The scale assesses emotion regulation process and several difficulties associated. Adapted and validated in Spain with sound psychometric properties reported -internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and incremental validity.

Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP32, Horowitz, 2000)

Is is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess interpersonal difficulties experienced over the past month. It covers eight dimensions of interpersonal functioning (e.g., being too controlling, socially inhibited, or self-sacrificing). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The IIP-32 is a widely validated and efficient tool for identifying interpersonal patterns relevant to psychological distress and treatment planning.

Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS; Norman et al., 2006)

Self-report 5-item questionnaire that assesses frequency and severity of anxiety symptoms during the previous week. With 5 Likert response options (from 0 to 4). Adapted in Spain with good internal consistency (α = .86) and test-retest reliability (k= .84)

Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS; Bentley et al., 2014)

Self-report 5-item questionnaire with 5 Likert response options (from 0 to 4). Assesses frequency and severity of depression symptoms during the previous week. Adapted in Spain with excellent psychometrics properties, internal consistency (α = .93) and convergent and discriminant validity

Working Alliance Inventory for Internet Interventions (WAI-I; Gómez Penedo et al., 2020).

12-items self-report questionnaire with 5 Likert response options. Assesses working alliance in internet-based interventions. Validated in German sample of adults with depressive symptoms receiving guided online intervention

Emotional Processing Self Report (EP-SR; Fisher et al., 2025)

Self-report 7-items questionnaire with 5 Likert response options. Assesses emotional processing during therapeutic sessions in three independent dimensions: emotional expression, regulation and understanding emotional meaning. The instrument demonstrates adequate psychometrics properties, with internal consistency, convergent, incremental and predictive validity in clinical sample. It has not yet been validated in Spanish speaking population.

Unified Protocol Skill Use Scale (UPSUS; Southward, & Sauer-Zavala, 2022)

Self-report 7-items questionnaire with 7 Likert response options. Assesses the use of emotional regulation skills from Barlow's Unified Protocol (UP). Adapted for Spanish speaking population

Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Brief PANAS; Watson et al., 1988

Self-report 10-items questionnaire with 5 Likert response options (1 to 5). Assesses positive and negative affectivity (trait/state) during the past few weeks. Adapted for Spanish speaking population

Quality of Life Index Spanish (QLI-Sp; Mezzich et al., 2000)

Self-report questionnaire containing 10 ítems with 10 Likert response options. Assess physical and emotional wellbeing, social support, interpersonal functioning, personal satisfaction and overall assessment of quality of life. Validated in Spanish speaking population with adequate psychometric properties in clinical sample (α = .87).

Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; Jerusalem & Schwarzer, 1992).

Self-report 10-items questionnaire with 4-point Likert scale. Assesses general sense of perceived self-efficacy. Validated in Spanish speaking population with sound psychometric properties

Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger et al., 2012).

Self-report 31-items questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale which assesses maladaptive personality traits proposed in the DSM-5. Validated in Spanish speaking population with adequate psychometric properties

Level of Personal Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0; Weekers et al., 2019).

Self-report 12-items questionnaire with 4-point Likert response options. Asseses levels of personality functioning according to the alternative model of personality disorders of DSM-5. There is Spanish version available

Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000).

Self-report questionnaire with Likert scale responses from 0 to 100%. Assesses treatment outcome expectations (patient subscale). High internal consistency (α =.79 -.90). Test-retest reliability: r = .82 for expectancy, r = .75 for credibility. Used in Spanish clinical trials with good results

System Usability Scale (SUS; Brooke, 1996).

Self-report 10-items questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5). Good psychometric properties (α = .91, Lewis, 2018). Validated in Spain with adequate psychometric properties (Castilla et al., 2023). Assesses usability of a digital program or tool.