수술 후 치통에서 Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium 고정 복합제, Acetaminophen 및 Naproxen Sodium에 관한 연구
수술 후 치통에서 아세트아미노펜/나프록센 나트륨 고정 조합, 아세트아미노펜 및 나프록센 나트륨의 완전 요인, 무작위, 이중 맹검, 위약 대조, 병렬 그룹, 단일 용량 효능 및 안전성 연구
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well a fixed combination of acetaminophen/naproxen sodium relieves postoperative dental pain compared with acetaminophen, naproxen sodium and placebo.
연구 개요
상태
상태
정황
정황
개입 / 치료
개입 / 치료
상세 설명
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose full-factorial study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of acetaminophen and naproxen sodium, compared with acetaminophen or naproxen sodium alone, and placebo following surgical extraction of three or four third molars.
연구 유형
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
등록
단계
단계
- 3단계
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, 미국, 84107
- JBR Clinical Research LLC
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Weigh 100 pounds or greater and have a body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.4 (inclusive) at screening
- Surgical removal of three or four third molars, of which, two must be mandibular impactions
- Meets requirements for post-surgical pain level
- Females of childbearing potential and males agree to contraceptive requirements of study
- Have a negative urine drug screen at screening, and on day of surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant female, breastfeeding, trying to become pregnant or male with pregnant partner or partner currently trying to become pregnant
- Have a known allergy or hypersensitivity to naproxen (or other NSAIDs including aspirin) or to acetaminophen, oxycodone or other opioids
- Not able to swallow whole large tablets or capsules
- History of any condition(s) in investigator's opinion, may jeopardize subject safety, well-being and integrity of study
- Use analgesics 5 or more times per week
- History of chronic tranquilizer use, heavy drinking, or substance abuse, as judged by the investigator site staff, in the last 5 years
- Use any immunosuppressive drugs within 2 weeks of surgical procedure
- History of endoscopically documented peptic ulcer disease or bleeding disorder in the last 2 years
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 요인 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
팔의 수
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium Fixed Combination
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium Fixed Combination tablets. |
Fixed combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium will be administered orally. |
|
활성 비교기: Naproxen Sodium
Participants will receive a single oral dose of one Naproxen Sodium tablet with one Placebo capsule. |
Placebo will be administered orally. Naproxen Sodium will be administered orally. |
|
활성 비교기: Acetaminophen
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Acetaminophen tablets. |
Acetaminophen will be administered orally. |
|
위약 비교기: Placebo
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Placebo capsules. |
Placebo will be administered orally. |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference From 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing (SPID 0-12)
기간: Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
|
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores were calculated using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) collected at each scheduled timepoint within the specified timeframe. The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity at that time point from the baseline pain intensity. The SPID scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous timepoint and adding these time weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0-12 hours. PID is ranging from 0 to 10 point and SPID 0-12 ranging from 0 to 120. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. |
Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
|
2차 결과 측정
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference From 6 to 12 Hours (SPID 6-12)
기간: From 6 to 12 hours
|
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores were calculated using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) collected at each scheduled timepoint within the specified timeframe. The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity at that time point from the baseline pain intensity. The SPID scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous timepoint and adding these time weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 6-12 hours. PID is ranging from 0 to 10 point and SPID6-12 ranging from 0 to 60. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. |
From 6 to 12 hours
|
|
Time to First Request of Rescue Analgesic
기간: 0 to 24 hours
|
Time to first request for rescue medication was measured as the elapsed time from when investigational product (IP) was given until the time rescue medication was first requested. |
0 to 24 hours
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Who Request Rescue Analgesic During the First 12 Hours
기간: Up to 12 hours
|
Proportion of participants who requested rescue analgesic during the first 12 hours was reported. |
Up to 12 hours
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Marsha Tharakan, MD, DDS, Kenvue Brands LLC
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
- Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Ballantyne JC, Burke LB, Carragee E, Cowan P, Croll S, Dionne RA, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Gordon DB, Iyengar S, Jay GW, Kalso EA, Kerns RD, McDermott MP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Royal MA, Segerdahl M, Stauffer JW, Todd KH, Vanhove GF, Wallace MS, West C, White RE, Wu C. Research design considerations for single-dose analgesic clinical trials in acute pain: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2016 Feb;157(2):288-301. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000375.
- Pickering G, Loriot MA, Libert F, Eschalier A, Beaune P, Dubray C. Analgesic effect of acetaminophen in humans: first evidence of a central serotonergic mechanism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;79(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.12.307.
- Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ. The value of the dental impaction pain model in drug development. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:175-90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_15.
- GUZMAN F, BRAUN C, LIM RK, POTTER GD, RODGERS DW. NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC ANALGESICS WHICH BLOCK VISCERAL PAIN EVOKED BY INTRA-ARTERIAL INJECTION OF BRADYKININ AND OTHER ALGESIC AGENTS. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 Jun 1;149:571-88. No abstract available.
- LIM RK, GUZMAN F, RODGERS DW, GOTO K, BRAUN C, DICKERSON GD, ENGLE RJ. SITE OF ACTION OF NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC ANALGESICS DETERMINED BY BLOCKING BRADYKININ-EVOKED VISCERAL PAIN. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 Nov 1;152:25-58. No abstract available.
- Aronoff DM, Oates JA, Boutaud O. New insights into the mechanism of action of acetaminophen: Its clinical pharmacologic characteristics reflect its inhibition of the two prostaglandin H2 synthases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan;79(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.09.009. No abstract available.
- Mallet C, Daulhac L, Bonnefont J, Ledent C, Etienne M, Chapuy E, Libert F, Eschalier A. Endocannabinoid and serotonergic systems are needed for acetaminophen-induced analgesia. Pain. 2008 Sep 30;139(1):190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.030. Epub 2008 May 15.
- Koch-Weser J. Drug therapy. Acetaminophen. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 2;295(23):1297-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197612022952306. No abstract available.
- Milton AS. Modern views on the pathogenesis of fever and the mode of action of antipyretic drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;28(4 SUPPL):393-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1976.tb04186.x. No abstract available.
- Ameer B, Greenblatt DJ. Acetaminophen. Ann Intern Med. 1977 Aug;87(2):202-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-87-2-202.
- Product Monograph for Aleve (Naproxen Sodium Tablets USP/Liquid Gels/Capsules 220 mg). Bayer Inc. Consumer Care. Revised 8 January 2015
- Todd PA, Clissold SP. Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs. 1990 Jul;40(1):91-137. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040010-00006.
- Davies NM, Anderson KE. Clinical pharmacokinetics of naproxen. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Apr;32(4):268-93. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732040-00002.
- Lipkovich I, Ratitch B, O'Kelly M. Sensitivity to censored-at-random assumption in the analysis of time-to-event endpoints. Pharm Stat. 2016 May;15(3):216-29. doi: 10.1002/pst.1738. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
- Cheung R, Krishnaswami S, Kowalski K. Analgesic efficacy of celecoxib in postoperative oral surgery pain: a single-dose, two-center, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2498-510. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.008.
- Fricke J, Davis N, Yu V, Krammer G. Lumiracoxib 400 mg compared with celecoxib 400 mg and placebo for treating pain following dental surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
- Clinical Study Report CCSPAA001068. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and activecontrolled, proof of concept study to evaluate two strengths of concomitantly dosed naproxen sodium with acetaminophen, compared with naproxen sodium, hydrocodone/acetaminophen and placebo in postoperative dental pain.: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., May 2019.
- Clinical Study Report CCSPAA002398. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Five Strengths of a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Postoperative Dental Pain.: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., November 2020.
- 21 CFR § 300.50 - Fixed-combination prescription drugs for humans, 40 FR 13496, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 64 FR 401, Jan. 5, 1999.
- Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
연구 시작
기본 완료 (실제)
기본 완료
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 완료
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
처음 게시됨
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
마지막 업데이트 게시됨
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
기타 연구 ID 번호
- CCSPAA005199
- CCSPAA005199 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (JJCI))
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .