Interpretation of the Meaningfulness of Symptom Reduction with Vibegron in Patients with Overactive Bladder: Analyses from EMPOWUR

Jeffrey Frankel, David Staskin, Susann Varano, Michael Kennelly, Diane K Newman, Matt T Rosenberg, Rachael A Jankowich, Denise Shortino, Paul N Mudd Jr, Cynthia J Girman, Jeffrey Frankel, David Staskin, Susann Varano, Michael Kennelly, Diane K Newman, Matt T Rosenberg, Rachael A Jankowich, Denise Shortino, Paul N Mudd Jr, Cynthia J Girman

Abstract

Introduction: Reductions in bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) demonstrate improvement in clinical trials, but patient perception of meaningfulness of such improvement is lacking. In the 12-week phase 3 EMPOWUR trial, vibegron significantly reduced average daily number of micturitions, urgency episodes, and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes vs placebo (P < 0.01 each). This analysis assessed meaningfulness of reductions in clinical endpoints observed in EMPOWUR using patient perception of improvement.

Methods: An anchor-based approach using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) applied to phase 2 data allowed predefining phase 3 responder definitions. To confirm in phase 3, median change from baseline at week 12 in average daily number of micturitions, urgency episodes, and UUI episodes was generated for each PGI-C category and pooled across treatments. Based on predefined meaningful responder definitions, percentages of patients achieving ≥ 15% reduction in micturitions (post hoc), ≥ 50% reduction in urgency episodes (predefined), and ≥ 75% (predefined) and ≥ 90% (post hoc) reduction in UUI episodes were determined for patients receiving vibegron or placebo.

Results: Across treatments, for micturitions, urgency episodes, and UUI episodes, median change from baseline to week 12 increased with greater subjective improvement based on PGI-C scores, and median reductions pooled across treatment groups were higher than the responder definitions that patients perceived as improved. Significantly more patients receiving vibegron vs placebo achieved ≥ 15% reduction in micturitions (56.3% vs 44.6%, respectively), ≥ 50% reduction in urgency episodes (39.5% vs 32.8%), ≥ 75% reduction in UUI episodes (49.3% vs 32.8%), and ≥ 90% reduction in UUI episodes (35.2% vs 23.5%) at week 12 (P < 0.05 each).

Conclusion: Significantly more patients treated with vibegron vs placebo in EMPOWUR achieved meaningful reductions in micturitions, urgency episodes, and UUI episodes that were associated with patient-perceived improvement. Results of these analyses support the meaningfulness of reductions in clinical endpoints observed in the 12-week EMPOWUR trial.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03492281.

Keywords: Patient global impression of change; Patient-reported outcome; Treatment effectiveness; Urinary incontinence, urge.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A Median (median percentage) change from baseline at week 12 in mean daily number of micturitions by PGI-C and B percentage of patients achieving ≥ 15% reduction from baseline in mean daily number of micturitions. PGI-C Patient Global Impression of Change
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Median (median percentage) change from baseline at week 12 in mean daily number of urgency episodes by PGI-C and B percentage of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in mean daily number of urgency episodes. PGI-C Patient Global Impression of Change
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A Median (median percentage) change from baseline at week 12 in mean daily number of UUI episodes by PGI-C and B percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 75% reduction and a ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in mean daily number of UUI episodes. PGI-C Patient Global Impression of Change, UUI urge urinary incontinence

References

    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
    1. Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. American Urological Association; 2019.
    1. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Vats V, Thompson C, Kopp ZS, Milsom I. National community prevalence of overactive bladder in the United States stratified by sex and age. Urology. 2011;77(5):1081–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.039.
    1. Rantell A, Cardozo L, Khullar V. Personal goals and expectations of OAB patients in the UK. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):1194–1200. doi: 10.1002/nau.23094.
    1. Kinsey D, Pretorius S, Glover L, Alexander T. The psychological impact of overactive bladder: a systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(1):69–81. doi: 10.1177/1359105314522084.
    1. Coyne KS, Payne C, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. The impact of urinary urgency and frequency on health-related quality of life in overactive bladder: results from a national community survey. Value Health. 2004;7(4):455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.74008.x.
    1. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Kopp ZS, Ebel-Bitoun C, Milsom I, Chapple C. The impact of overactive bladder on mental health, work productivity and health-related quality of life in the UK and Sweden: results from EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2011;108(9):1459–1471. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10013.x.
    1. Johnston KM, Walker DR, Lakzadeh P. Characterizing the health-related quality of life burden of overactive bladder using disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic literature review. Adv Ther. 2019;36(3):548–562. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0880-8.
    1. Lai HH, Rawal A, Shen B, Vetter J. The relationship between anxiety and overactive bladder or urinary incontinence symptoms in the clinical population. Urology. 2016;98:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.013.
    1. Lai HH, Shen B, Rawal A, Vetter J. The relationship between depression and overactive bladder/urinary incontinence symptoms in the clinical OAB population. BMC Urol. 2016;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0179-x.
    1. Appell RA. Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder: a pooled analysis. Urology. 1997;50(6A Suppl):90–99. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00599-2.
    1. Chapple C, Steers W, Norton P, et al. A pooled analysis of three phase III studies to investigate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of darifenacin, a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist, in the treatment of overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2005;95(7):993–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05454.x.
    1. Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Herschorn S, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: results of a phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2186–2193. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.022.
    1. Nitti VW, Khullar V, van Kerrebroeck P, et al. Mirabegron for the treatment of overactive bladder: a prespecified pooled efficacy analysis and pooled safety analysis of three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(7):619–632. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12194.
    1. Chapple CR, Kelleher CJ, Evans CJ, et al. A narrative review of patient-reported outcomes in overactive bladder: what is the way of the future? Eur Urol. 2016;70(5):799–805. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.033.
    1. Brubaker L, Chapple C, Coyne KS, Kopp Z. Patient-reported outcomes in overactive bladder: importance for determining clinical effectiveness of treatment. Urology. 2006;68(2 Suppl):3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.045.
    1. Frankel J, Varano S, Staskin D, Shortino D, Jankowich R, Mudd PN., Jr Vibegron improves quality-of-life measures in patients with overactive bladder: patient-reported outcomes from the EMPOWUR study. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(5):e13937. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13937.
    1. Abrams P, Kelleher C, Huels J, Quebe-Fehling E, Omar MA, Steel M. Clinical relevance of health-related quality of life outcomes with darifenacin. BJU Int. 2008;102(2):208–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07523.x.
    1. Herschorn S, Staskin D, Tu LM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in patients with overactive bladder treated with mirabegron and tolterodine in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, two-period crossover, multicenter study (PREFER) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0892-0.
    1. GEMTESA® (vibegron) Full Prescribing Information. Irvine: GEMTESA; 2020.
    1. Staskin D, Frankel J, Varano S, Shortino D, Jankowich R, Mudd PN., Jr International phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vibegron in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder: EMPOWUR. J Urol. 2020;204(2):316–324. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000807.
    1. Brown JS, McNaughton KS, Wyman JF, et al. Measurement characteristics of a voiding diary for use by men and women with overactive bladder. Urology. 2003;61(4):802–809. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02505-0.
    1. Tincello DG, Owen RK, Slack MC, Abrams KR. Validation of the Patient Global Impression scales for use in detrusor overactivity: secondary analysis of the RELAX study. BJOG. 2013;120(2):212–216. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12069.
    1. Mitcheson HD, Samanta S, Muldowney K, et al. Vibegron (RVT-901/MK-4618/KRP-114V) administered once daily as monotherapy or concomitantly with tolterodine in patients with an overactive bladder: a multicenter, phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.006.
    1. Greenland S, Robins JM. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985;41(1):55–68. doi: 10.2307/2530643.
    1. Norquist JM, Girman C, Fehnel S, DeMuro-Mercon C, Santanello N. Choice of recall period for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: criteria for consideration. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(6):1013–1020. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0003-8.
    1. Pinto CA, Norquist J, Liao J, Frenkl T, Girman C. Understanding MID for micturition frequency, a pivotal endpoint for OAB studies. Presented at: ISPOR 19th Annual International Meeting; May 31–June 4, 2014; Montreal, QC, Canada.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2009.
    1. Desroziers K, Aballéa S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.
    1. Coyne KS, Elinoff V, Gordon DA, et al. Relationships between improvements in symptoms and patient assessments of bladder condition, symptom bother and health-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder treated with tolterodine. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(6):925–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01778.x.
    1. Crosby RD, Mathias SD, Marshall TS. Relationships between symptoms, symptom bother, and health-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder taking solifenacin or placebo in the VIBRANT study. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(2):211–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02532.x.
    1. Kubota Y, Kojima Y, Shibata Y, Imura M, Kohri K, Sasaki S. Correlation between improvements in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and health-related quality of life questionnaires in overactive bladder patients treated with an antimuscarinic drug. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(7):1309–1314.
    1. Van Kerrebroeck PE, Kelleher CJ, Coyne KS, Kopp Z, Brodsky M, Wang JT. Correlations among improvements in urgency urinary incontinence, health-related quality of life, and perception of bladder-related problems in incontinent subjects with overactive bladder treated with tolterodine or placebo. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-13.
    1. Brubaker L, Shull B. EGGS for patient-centered outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16:171–173. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1300-y.
    1. Lee KS, Lee YS, Kim JC, Seo JT, Lee JZ, Choo MS. Patient-reported goal achievement after antimuscarinic treatment in patients with overactive bladder symptoms. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(7):663–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02951.x.
    1. Choo MS, Doo CK, Lee KS. Satisfaction with tolterodine: assessing symptom-specific patient-reported goal achievement in the treatment of overactive bladder in female patients (STARGATE study) Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(2):191–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01652.x.
    1. Mostafaei H, Janisch F, Mori K, et al. Placebo response in patients with oral therapy for overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 (Epub ahead of print).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren