Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for real-time, proportional control of a Neuroprosthetic hand
Christopher M Frost, Daniel C Ursu, Shane M Flattery, Andrej Nedic, Cheryl A Hassett, Jana D Moon, Patrick J Buchanan, R Brent Gillespie, Theodore A Kung, Stephen W P Kemp, Paul S Cederna, Melanie G Urbanchek, Christopher M Frost, Daniel C Ursu, Shane M Flattery, Andrej Nedic, Cheryl A Hassett, Jana D Moon, Patrick J Buchanan, R Brent Gillespie, Theodore A Kung, Stephen W P Kemp, Paul S Cederna, Melanie G Urbanchek
Abstract
Introduction: Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) are biological constructs which amplify neural signals and have shown long-term stability in rat models. Real-time control of a neuroprosthesis in rat models has not yet been demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to: a) design and validate a system for translating electromyography (EMG) signals from an RPNI in a rat model into real-time control of a neuroprosthetic hand, and; b) use the system to demonstrate RPNI proportional neuroprosthesis control.
Methods: Animals were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: (1) Control; (2) Denervated, and; (3) RPNI. In the RPNI group, the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle was dissected free, denervated, transferred to the lateral thigh and neurotized with the residual end of the transected common peroneal nerve. Rats received tactile stimuli to the hind-limb via monofilaments, and electrodes were used to record EMG. Signals were filtered, rectified and integrated using a moving sample window. Processed EMG signals (iEMG) from RPNIs were validated against Control and Denervated group outputs.
Results: Voluntary reflexive rat movements produced signaling that activated the prosthesis in both the Control and RPNI groups, but produced no activation in the Denervated group. Signal-to-Noise ratio between hind-limb movement and resting iEMG was 3.55 for Controls and 3.81 for RPNIs. Both Control and RPNI groups exhibited a logarithmic iEMG increase with increased monofilament pressure, allowing graded prosthetic hand speed control (R2 = 0.758 and R2 = 0.802, respectively).
Conclusion: EMG signals were successfully acquired from RPNIs and translated into real-time neuroprosthetic control. Signal contamination from muscles adjacent to the RPNI was minimal. RPNI constructs provided reliable proportional prosthetic hand control.
Keywords: Amputees; Peripheral nerve Interface; Prosthetics; Regenerative medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approvalAll animal care and use procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, (1996) and were approved by the University of Michigan Animal Care and Use Committee, under protocol number PRO00005717.
Consent for publicationNot applicable.
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s NoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
- Ziegler-Graham K, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
- Cloutier A, Yang J. Design, control, and sensory feedback of externally powered hand prostheses: a literature review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;41(2):161–181. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2013007887.
- Cordella F, et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:209. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00209.
- Cowley J, Resnik L, Wilken J, Smurr Walters L, Gates D. Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41:33–40. doi: 10.1177/0309364616631348.
- Miranda RA, et al. DARPA-funded efforts in the development of novel brain-computer interface technologies. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;244:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.019.
- Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):236–257. doi: 10.1080/03093640600994581.
- Ryait HS, Arora AS, Agarwal R. Study of issues in the development of surface EMG controlled human hand. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(Suppl 1):S107–S114. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3492-4.
- Engdahl SM, et al. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2015;12:53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0044-2.
- Navarro X, et al. A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005;10(3):229–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x.
- Gilja V, et al. Clinical translation of a high-performance neural prosthesis. Nat Med. 2015;21(10):1142–1145. doi: 10.1038/nm.3953.
- Badia J, et al. Spatial and functional selectivity of peripheral nerve signal recording with the transversal Intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(1):20–27. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2440768.
- Castro F, Negredo P, Avendano C. Fiber composition of the rat sciatic nerve and its modification during regeneration through a sieve electrode. Brain Res. 2008;1190:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.028.
- Larsen JO, et al. Degeneration and regeneration in rabbit peripheral nerve with long-term nerve cuff electrode implant: a stereological study of myelinated and unmyelinated axons. Acta Neuropathol. 1998;96(4):365–378. doi: 10.1007/s004010050907.
- Thil MA, et al. Time course of tissue remodelling and electrophysiology in the rat sciatic nerve after spiral cuff electrode implantation. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;185(1–2):103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.01.021.
- Tan DW, et al. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(257):257ra138. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669.
- Yoshida K, Stieglitz T, Shaoyu Q. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2014. Bioelectric interfaces for the peripheral nervous system.
- Thota AK, et al. A system and method to interface with multiple groups of axons in several fascicles of peripheral nerves. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;244:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.020.
- Jia X, et al. Residual motor signal in long-term human severed peripheral nerves and feasibility of neural signal-controlled artificial limb. J Hand Surg. 2007;32(5):657–666. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.02.021.
- Hargrove L, et al. The effect of ECG interference on pattern-recognition-based myoelectric control for targeted muscle reinnervated patients. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(9):2197–2201. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2010392.
- Kuiken TA, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA. 2009;301(6):619–628. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.116.
- Ohnishi K, Weir RF, Kuiken TA. Neural machine interfaces for controlling multifunctional powered upper-limb prostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(1):43–53. doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.1.43.
- Zhou P, et al. Decoding a New Neural–Machine Interface for Control of Artificial Limbs. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:2974–2982. doi: 10.1152/jn.00178.2007.
- Cheesborough JE, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation in the initial management of traumatic upper extremity amputation injury. Hand (New York) 2014;9(2):253–257. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9602-5.
- Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K. The DEKA arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the veterans affairs study to optimize the DEKA arm. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2014;38(6):492–504. doi: 10.1177/0309364613506913.
- Jiang N, Englehart KB, Parker PA. Extracting simultaneous and proportional neural control information for multiple-DOF prostheses from the surface electromyographic signal. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(4):1070–1080. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2007967.
- Kubiak CA, Kemp SWP, Cederna PS. The regenerative peripheral nerve interface for neuroma management. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):681–682. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0864.
- Baldwin J, et al. Abstract 99: Early Muscle Revascularization and Regeneration at the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1S):73. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000416183.37499.89.
- Urbanchek MG, et al. Long-Term Stability of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNI) Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(4S):88–89. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000406317.25436.00.
- Kung TA, et al. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1380–1394. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000168.
- Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals . Nat'l Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8. Washington (DC): Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; 2011.
- Nedic A, Moon JD, Kung TA, et al. Von Frey monofilament testing successfully discriminates between sensory function of mixed nerve and sensory nerve regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces. 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER); 2013. p. 255–8.
- Wurth SM, Hargrove LJ. A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts’ law style assessment procedure. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-91.
- Geethanjali P. Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review. Med Devices (Auckl) 2016;9:247–255.
- Metral S, Cassar G. Relationship between force and integrated EMG activity during voluntary isometric anisotonic contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1981;46(2):185–198. doi: 10.1007/BF00428870.
- Ottobock USA, SensorHand Speed Myoelectric Prosthesis Technical Data. Pamphlet. 2018. .
- Belter JT, et al. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(5):599–618. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0188.
- Yao J, et al. Sensory cortical re-mapping following upper-limb amputation and subsequent targeted reinnervation: a case report. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.01.010.
- Alshammary NA, Dalley SA, Goldfarb M. Assessment of a multigrasp myoelectric control approach for use by transhumeral amputees. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:968–971.
- Hu Y, et al. Muscle graft volume for regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces as optimized by electrical signal capacity for Neuroprosthetic control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(2):443. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000470143.71088.33.
- Micera S, Navarro X. Bidirectional interfaces with the peripheral nervous system. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;86:23–38. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86002-9.
- Vasudevan S, Patel K, Welle C. Rodent model for assessing the long term safety and performance of peripheral nerve recording electrodes. J Neural Eng. 2017;14(1):016008. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016008.
- Smith LH, Kuiken TA, Hargrove LJ. Evaluation of Linear Regression Simultaneous Myoelectric Control Using Intramuscular EMG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63:737–46. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2469741.
Source: PubMed