Effect of Prices, Distribution Strategies, and Marketing on Demand for HIV Self-testing in Zimbabwe: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Wei Chang, Primrose Matambanadzo, Albert Takaruza, Karin Hatzold, Frances M Cowan, Euphemia Sibanda, Harsha Thirumurthy, Wei Chang, Primrose Matambanadzo, Albert Takaruza, Karin Hatzold, Frances M Cowan, Euphemia Sibanda, Harsha Thirumurthy

Abstract

Importance: HIV self-testing is a promising approach for increasing awareness of HIV status in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Zimbabwe, where HIV prevalence is 13%. Evidence is lacking, however, on the optimal pricing policies and delivery strategies for maximizing the effect of HIV self-testing.

Objective: To assess demand for HIV self-testing among adults and priority-population subgroups under alternative pricing and distribution strategies.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial recruited study participants between February 15, 2018, and April 25, 2018, in urban and rural communities in Zimbabwe. A factorial design was used to randomize participants to a combination of self-test price, distribution site, and promotional message. Individuals and their household members had to be at least 16 years old to be eligible for participation. This intention-to-treat population comprised 3996 participants.

Interventions: Participants were given a voucher that could be redeemed for an HIV self-test within 1 month at varying prices (US $0-$3) and distribution sites (clinics or pharmacies in urban areas, and retail stores or community health workers in rural areas). Vouchers included randomly assigned promotional messages that emphasized the benefits of HIV testing.

Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of participants who obtained self-tests in each trial arm, measured by distributor records.

Results: Among the 4000 individuals enrolled, 3996 participants were included. In total, the mean (SD) age was 35 (14.7) years, and most participants (2841 [71.1%]) were female. Self-testing demand was highly price sensitive; 260 participants (32.5%) who were offered free self-tests redeemed their vouchers, compared with 55 participants (6.9%) who were offered self-tests for US $0.50 (odds ratio [OR], 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10-0.19), a reduction in demand of more than 25 percentage points. Demand was below 3% in the $1, $2, and $3 groups, which was statistically significantly lower than the demand in the free distribution group: in pooled analyses, demand was considerably lower among participants in higher-than-$0 price groups compared with the free distribution group (2.8% vs 32.5%; OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.04-0.07). In urban areas, demand was statistically significantly higher with pharmacy-based distribution compared with clinic-based distribution (6.8% vs 2.9%; adjusted OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.74-4.45). Price sensitivity was statistically significantly higher among rural residents, men, and those who had never received testing before. Promotional messages did not influence demand.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that demand for HIV self-testing in Zimbabwe was highly price sensitive, suggesting that free distribution may be essential for promoting testing among high-priority population groups; additionally, pharmacy-based distribution was preferable to clinic-based distribution in urban areas.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03559959.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Takaruza reported receiving grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through Population Services International during the conduct of the study. Dr Cowan reported receiving grants from UNITAID, the National Institutes of Health, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Viiv Healthcare, USAID, and Medical Research Council outside the submitted work. Dr Sibanda reported receiving grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through Population Services International during the conduct of the study. Dr Thirumurthy reported receiving grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. CONSORT Flow Diagram
Figure.. CONSORT Flow Diagram
An equal number of individuals from each price group were randomized to each distribution strategy and subsequently to each promotional message type. aPrivacy message: “Be the first to know your status and take the right action.” bEarly treatment message: “Positive or negative, life is full of hope. If you test HIV-positive, you can immediately access treatment and continue to lead a healthy life.”

References

    1. UNAIDS 90-90-90 An Ambitious Treatment Target to Help End the AIDS Epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2014. doi:10.7448/IAS.16.4.18751
    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Miles to Go: Closing Gaps, Breaking Barriers, Righting Injustices Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2018. . Accessed January 19, 2019.
    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Blind Spot: Reaching Out to Men and Boys: Addressing a Blind Spot in the Response to HIV Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2017. . Accessed January 18, 2019.
    1. World Health Organization Guidelines on HIV Self-Testing and Partner Notification: Supplement to Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Testing Services Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. . Accessed September 22, 2018.
    1. Napierala Mavedzenge S, Baggaley R, Corbett EL. A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(1):-. doi:10.1093/cid/cit156
    1. Figueroa C, Johnson C, Verster A, Baggaley R. Attitudes and acceptability on HIV self-testing among key populations: a literature review. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(11):1949-1965. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1097-8
    1. Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Mavedzenge SN, Maman S, Omanga E, Agot K. Promoting male partner HIV testing and safer sexual decision making through secondary distribution of self-tests by HIV-negative female sex workers and women receiving antenatal and post-partum care in Kenya: a cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(6):e266-e274. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(16)00041-2
    1. Choko AT, Desmond N, Webb EL, et al. . The uptake and accuracy of oral kits for HIV self-testing in high HIV prevalence setting: a cross-sectional feasibility study in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Med. 2011;8(10):e1001102. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001102
    1. Kalibala S, Tun W, Cherutich P, Nganga A, Oweya E, Oluoch P. Factors associated with acceptability of HIV self-testing among health care workers in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(suppl 4):S405-S414. doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0830-z
    1. Krause J, Subklew-Sehume F, Kenyon C, Colebunders R. Acceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):735. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-735
    1. Johnson CC, Kennedy C, Fonner V, et al. . Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21594. doi:10.7448/IAS.20.1.21594
    1. Zanolini A, Chipungu J, Vinikoor MJ, et al. . HIV self-testing in Lusaka Province, Zambia: acceptability, comprehension of testing instructions, and individual preferences for self-test kit distribution in a population-based sample of adolescents and adults. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018;34(3):254-260. doi:10.1089/aid.2017.0156
    1. OraSure Technologies Press release: OraSure technologies to drive accelerated adoption of OraQuick® HIV self-test. . Published June 27, 2017. Accessed June 27, 2019.
    1. Cohen J, Dupas P. Free distribution or cost sharing? evidence from a randomized malaria prevention experiment in Kenya. Q J Econ. 2010;125(1):1-45. doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.1
    1. Comfort AB, Krezanoski PJ. The effect of price on demand for and use of bednets: evidence from a randomized experiment in Madagascar. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(2):178-193. doi:10.1093/heapol/czw108
    1. Fischer G, Karlan D, McConnell M, Raffler P. Short-term subsidies and seller type: a health products experiment in Uganda. J Dev Econ. 2019;137(C):110-124. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.07.013
    1. Ashraf N, Berry J, Shapiro JM. Can higher prices stimulate product use? evidence from a field experiment in Zambia. Am Econ Rev. 2010;100(5):2383-2413. doi:10.1257/aer.100.5.2383
    1. Cohen J, Dupas P, Schaner S. Price subsidies, diagnostic tests, and targeting of malaria treatment: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Am Econ Rev. 2015;105(2):609-645. doi:10.1257/aer.20130267
    1. Dupas P. Short-run subsidies and long-run adoption of new health products: evidence from a field experiment. Econometrica. 2014;82(1):197-228. doi:10.3982/ECTA9508
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. ; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group . CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):e1-e37. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004
    1. Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care AIDS and TB Programme. Zimbabwe National and Sub-National HIV Estimates Report 2017 . Published July 2018. Accessed July 23, 2019.
    1. Indravudh PP, Sibanda EL, d’Elbée M, et al. . ‘I will choose when to test, where I want to test’: investigating young people’s preferences for HIV self-testing in Malawi and Zimbabwe. AIDS. 2017;31(suppl 3):S203-S212. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001516
    1. Musheke M, Ntalasha H, Gari S, et al. . A systematic review of qualitative findings on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):220. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-220
    1. Ai C, Norton EC. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econ Lett. 2003;80(1):123-129. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
    1. Karaca-Mandic P, Norton EC, Dowd B. Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(1, pt 1):255-274. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01314.x
    1. World Health Organization, Unitaid. Market and Technology Landscape: HIV Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Self-Testing 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017. . Accessed January 27, 2019.
    1. Ochako R, Vu L, Peterson K Insights into potential users and messaging for HIV oral self-test kits in Kenya. Harvard Dataverse, V1. 2014. doi:10.7910/DVN/CJE4KL
    1. Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Agot K. Willingness to pay for HIV self-tests among women in Kenya: implications for subsidy and pricing policies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;78(2):e8-e11. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001659
    1. Jennings L, Conserve DF, Merrill J, et al. . Perceived cost advantages and disadvantages of purchasing HIV self-testing kits among urban Tanzanian men: an inductive content analysis. J AIDS Clin Res. 2017;8(8):725. doi:10.4172/2155-6113.1000725
    1. Hansen KS, Pedrazzoli D, Mbonye A, et al. . Willingness-to-pay for a rapid malaria diagnostic test and artemisinin-based combination therapy from private drug shops in Mukono District, Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(2):185-196. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs048
    1. Tawiah T, Malam K, Kwarteng A, et al. . Improving the first-line treatment of febrile illnesses in Ghana: willingness to pay for malaria rapid diagnostic tests at licensed chemical shops in the Kintampo area. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12962-018-0090-2
    1. Stevens DR, Vrana CJ, Dlin RE, Korte JE. A global review of HIV self-testing: themes and implications. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(2):497-512. doi:10.1007/s10461-017-1707-8
    1. Sibanda E, Neuman M, Tumushime M, Hatzold K, Watadzaushe C, Mutseta M Linkage to care after HIV self-testing in Zimbabwe: a cluster randomised trial. Abstract presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 4-7, 2018; Boston, MA. . Accessed July 19, 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren