Oral 24% sucrose associated with nonnutritive sucking for pain control in healthy term newborns receiving venipuncture beyond the first week of life

Giuseppe De Bernardo, Marina Riccitelli, Desiree Sordino, Maurizio Giordano, Sabrina Piccolo, Giuseppe Buonocore, Serafina Perrone, Giuseppe De Bernardo, Marina Riccitelli, Desiree Sordino, Maurizio Giordano, Sabrina Piccolo, Giuseppe Buonocore, Serafina Perrone

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that oral administration of 24% sucrose associated with nonnutritive sucking in healthy newborns receiving venipuncture beyond the first week of life controls pain and pain-related variation in heart rate (HR) and noninvasive oxygen saturation (SpO2).

Methods: A total of 66 term newborns were enrolled between February and September 2017 in the Neonatology Department of AORN Santobono-Pausilipon, Naples. They were randomly assigned to receive oral 1 mL 24% sucrose (treated group [TG], n=33; gestational age 38.53±1.49 weeks; body weight 3,035±55 g; age 22.40±6.82 weeks) or oral 1 mL 10% glucose (control group [CG], n=33; gestational age 38.91±1.45 weeks; body weight 3,203±65 g; age 23.36±7.02 weeks) 1 minute before and during venipuncture. Evaluations were carried out between 8 and 9 am in all newborns. The Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was used to assess pain in newborns. Outcome measurements (HR, SpO2) were obtained before (T0), during (T1), and 1 minute after (T2) venipuncture using a Nellcor bedside SpO2 patient-monitoring system. NIPS scores were recorded throughout the procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0. Changes in HR and SpO2 were assessed by mixed ANOVA for repeated measures. NIPS scores were evaluated by Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in HR or SpO2 between TG and CG at T0. HR was significantly lower in TG than CG at both T1 and T2 (P<0.05), whereas SpO2 was significantly higher in TG than CG at both T1 and T2 (P<0.05). NIPS scores were significantly lower in TG (median 0) than CG (median 6) during the entire procedure (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Oral administration of 24% sucrose associated with nonnutritive sucking prior to and during a painful procedure has a strong impact on pain response in term newborns, reducing NIPS scores and influencing pain-associated variations in HR and SpO2. Complete analgesia during painful procedures in term newborns might prevent pain reactivity and its behavioral and neurodevelopmental consequences. Replication of this study is needed before widespread application of findings.

Keywords: heart rate; neonatal pain; oral sucrose.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heart-rate trend from T0 to T2 in control and treated groups. *P<0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SpO2 trend from T0 to T2 in control and treated groups. *P<0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) scores from T0 to T2 in control group and treated group. Notes: Dashed line points out the threshold of the pain. A score ≥4 indicates pain. *P<0.05.

References

    1. Hartley C, Goksan S, Poorun R, et al. The relationship between nociceptive brain activity, spinal reflex withdrawal and behaviour in newborn infants. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12519.
    1. Fitzgerald M. What do we really know about newborn infant pain? Exp Physiol. 2015;100(12):1451–1457.
    1. Thakkar P, Arora K, Goyal K. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of combined sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for analgesia in newborns undergoing minor painful procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J of Perin. 2015:1–4.
    1. Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Chau V, et al. Procedural pain and brain development in premature newborns. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(3):385–396.
    1. Perrone S, Bellieni CV, Negro S, et al. Oxidative stress as a physiological pain response in full-term newborns. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:3759287–7.
    1. Bellieni CV, Cordelli DM, Marchi S, et al. Sensorial saturation for neonatal analgesia. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(3):219–221.
    1. Costa P, Bueno M, Oliva CL, Elci de Castro T, Ponce de Camargo P, Kimura AF. Analgesia and sedation during placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(4):801–807.
    1. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochr Data of Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD001069.
    1. Lee GY, Yamada J, Kyololo O, Shorkey A, Stevens B. Pediatric clinical practice guidelines for acute procedural pain: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):500–515.
    1. Stevens B, Yamada J, Campbell-Yeo M, et al. The minimally effective dose of sucrose for procedural pain relief in neonates: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):85.
    1. Rodríguez RG, Pattini AE, Roberto GR, Andrea EP. Neonatal intensive care unit lighting: update and recommendations. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016;114(4):361–367.
    1. Lago P, Garetti E, Pirelli A. Linee guida per la prevenzione ed il trattamento del dolore nel neonato. Gruppo di Studio di Rianimazione Neonatale, Societ Italiana di Neonatologia; 2016.
    1. Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, Macmurray SB, Dulberg C. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw. 1993;12(6):59–66.
    1. Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, Petrie-Thomas J, et al. Neonatal pain, parenting stress and interaction, in relation to cognitive and motor development at 8 and 18 months in preterm infants. Pain. 2009;143(1–2):138–146.
    1. Rioualen S, Durier V, Hervé D, Misery L, Sizun J, Roué JM. Cortical pain response of newborn infants to venepuncture: a randomized controlled trial comparing analgesic effects of sucrose versus breastfeeding. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(7):650–656.
    1. Efe E, Savaşer S. The effect of two different methods used during peripheral venous blood collection on pain reduction in neonates. Agri. 2007;19(2):49–56.
    1. Meesters N, Simons S, van Rosmalen J, Reiss I, van den Anker J, van Dijk M. Waiting 2 minutes after sucrose administration-unnecessary? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102(2):F167–F169.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren