Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of ten-valent versus 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines among infants in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a randomised controlled trial

Beth Temple, Nguyen Trong Toan, Vo Thi Trang Dai, Kathryn Bright, Paul Vincent Licciardi, Rachel Ann Marimla, Cattram Duong Nguyen, Doan Y Uyen, Anne Balloch, Tran Ngoc Huu, Edward Kim Mulholland, Beth Temple, Nguyen Trong Toan, Vo Thi Trang Dai, Kathryn Bright, Paul Vincent Licciardi, Rachel Ann Marimla, Cattram Duong Nguyen, Doan Y Uyen, Anne Balloch, Tran Ngoc Huu, Edward Kim Mulholland

Abstract

Background: Few data are available to support the choice between the two currently available pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), ten-valent PCV (PCV10) and 13-valent PCV (PCV13). Here we report a head-to-head comparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of PCV10 and PCV13.

Methods: In this parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial, healthy infants from two districts in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, were randomly allocated (in a 3:3:5:4:5:4 ratio), with use of a computer-generated list, to one of six infant PCV schedules: PCV10 in a 3 + 1 (group A), 3 + 0 (group B), 2 + 1 (group C), or two-dose schedule (group D); PCV13 in a 2 + 1 schedule (group E); or no infant PCV (control; group F). Blood samples were collected from infants between 2 months and 18 months of age at various timepoints before and after PCV doses and analysed (in a blinded manner) by ELISA and opsonophagocytic assay. The trial had two independent aims: to compare vaccination responses between PCV10 and PCV13, and to evaluate different schedules of PCV10. In this Article, we present results pertaining to the first aim. The primary outcome was the proportion of infants with an IgG concentration of at least 0·35 μg/mL for the ten serotypes common to the two vaccines at age 5 months, 4 weeks after the two-dose primary vaccination series (group C vs group E, per protocol population). An overall difference among the schedules was defined as at least seven of ten serotypes differing in the same direction at the 10% level. We also assessed whether the two-dose primary series of PCV13 (group E) was non-inferior at the 10% level to a three-dose primary series of PCV10 (groups A and B). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01953510.

Findings: Of 1424 infants screened between Sept 30, 2013, and Jan 9, 2015, 1201 were allocated to the six groups: 152 (13%) to group A, 149 (12%) to group B, 250 (21%) to group C, 202 (17%) to group D, 251 (21%) to group E, and 197 (16%) to group F. 237 (95%) participants in group C (PCV10) and 232 (92%) in group E (PCV13) completed the primary vaccination series and had blood draws within the specified window at age 5 months, at which time the proportion of infants with IgG concentrations of at least 0·35 μg/mL did not differ between groups at the 10% level for any serotype (PCV10-PCV13 risk difference -2·1% [95% CI -4·8 to -0·1] for serotype 1; -1·3% [-3·7 to 0·6] for serotype 4; -3·4% [-6·8 to -0·4] for serotype 5; 15·6 [7·2 to 23·7] for serotype 6B; -1·3% [-3·7 to 0·6] for serotype 7F; -1·6% [-5·1 to 1·7] for serotype 9V; 0·0% [-2·7 to 2·9] for serotype 14; -2·1% [-5·3 to 0·9] for serotype 18C; 0·0% [-2·2 to 2·3] for serotype 19F; and -11·6% [-18·2 to -4·9] for serotype 23F). At the same timepoint, two doses of PCV13 were non-inferior to three doses of PCV10 for nine of the ten shared serotypes (excluding 6B). Reactogenicity and serious adverse events were monitored according to good clinical practice guidelines, and the profiles were similar in the two groups.

Interpretation: PCV10 and PCV13 are similarly highly immunogenic when used in 2 + 1 schedule. The choice of vaccine might be influenced by factors such as the comparative magnitude of the antibody responses, price, and the relative importance of different serotypes in different settings.

Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile Samples collected outside the visit window (27–43 days post-vaccination) were included only in the intention-to-treat analyses. The most common reason for participants to be without a blood sample was that the nurse was unable to successfully find a vein (18 [49%] of 37 missing blood draws). PCV=pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. PCV10=ten-valent PCV. PCV13=13-valent PCV. *PCV (and the hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B [DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB] vaccine) were administered at 9·5 months in participants from groups C and E because the Vietnamese Ministry of Health does not permit co-administration of measles and DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB (see appendix for full schedules of PCV and co-administered vaccines). †The 2-month blood sample from group A provided pre-PCV data; samples at this timepoint were only collected from one study group, with the assumption that all groups would be interchangeable at baseline as a result of randomisation. ‡125 participants from groups C and E contributed to the opsonophagocytic assay analyses, selected as the first 125 with both post-primary series and post-booster blood samples collected. §Participants allocated to groups A–E from the last 300 recruited provided a blood sample at 18 months of age, with the remainder providing a sample at an alternative timepoint (appendix).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative immunogenicity of PCV13 versus PCV10 at 4 weeks post-primary series Data are differences (PCV10 minus PCV13) in the proportions of patients with protective serotype-specific IgG concentrations (≥0·35 μg/mL) in patients who received PCV13 versus those who received PCV10. (A) Two-dose primary series of PCV13 (at 2 months and 4 months; group E) versus two-dose primary series of PCV10 (at 2 months and 4 months; group C). (B) Two-dose primary series of PCV13 (group E) versus three-dose primary series of PCV10 (at 2 months, 3 months, and 4 months; groups A and B). Bars represent 95% CIs for two-sided tests of difference (A) or 90% CIs for one-sided tests of non-inferiority (B), with solid vertical lines indicating the predefined thresholds for determining differences or non-inferiority between groups. PCV10=ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. PCV13=13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serotype-specific IgG concentrations before and after PCV10 or PCV13 vaccinations GMCs of serotype-specific IgG (lines) and proportion of participants with protective concentrations (≥0·35 μg/mL) of serotype-specific IgG (bars) over time, for the ten shared serotypes and the three additional serotypes in PCV13, with 95% CIs. Sources of data were as follows: group A at 2 months of age (pre-PCV); group D (PCV10) and group E (PCV13) at 3 months of age (after one dose); and group C (PCV10) and group E (PCV13) at 5 months (after two-dose primary series), 9 months (pre-booster), 10 months (post-booster), and 18 months of age (in a subset of participants). GMC=geometric mean concentration. PCV10=ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. PCV13=13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

References

    1. Wahl B, O'Brien KL, Greenbaum A. Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in children in the era of conjugate vaccines: global, regional, and national estimates for 2000–15. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e744–e757.
    1. Jokinen J, Rinta-Kokko H, Siira L. Impact of ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease in Finnish children—a population-based study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120290.
    1. Domingues CM, Verani JR, Montenegro Renoiner EI. Effectiveness of ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease in Brazil: a matched case-control study. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:464–471.
    1. Deceuninck G, De Serres G, Boulianne N, Lefebvre B, De Wals P. Effectiveness of three pneumococcal conjugate vaccines to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease in Quebec, Canada. Vaccine. 2015;33:2684–2689.
    1. Vesikari T, Wysocki J, Chevallier B. Immunogenicity of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) compared to the licensed 7vCRM vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(4 suppl):S66–S76.
    1. Yeh SH, Gurtman A, Hurley DC. Immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants and toddlers. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e493–e505.
    1. Kieninger DM, Kueper K, Steul K. Safety, tolerability, and immunologic noninferiority of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given with routine pediatric vaccinations in Germany. Vaccine. 2010;28:4192–4203.
    1. Pomat WS, van den Biggelaar AHJ, Wana S. Safety and immunogenicity of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in a high-risk population: a randomised controlled trial of 10-valent and 13-valent PCV in Papua New Guinean infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy743. published online Sept 3.
    1. Prymula R, Szenborn L, Silfverdal SA. Safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two investigational pneumococcal protein-based vaccines: results from a randomized phase II study in infants. Vaccine. 2017;35:4603–4611.
    1. Carmona Martinez A, Prymula R, Miranda Valdivieso M. Immunogenicity and safety of 11- and 12-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccines (11vPHiD-CV, 12vPHiD-CV) in infants: results from a phase II, randomised, multicentre study. Vaccine. 2019;37:176–186.
    1. Wijmenga-Monsuur AJ, van Westen E, Knol MJ. Direct comparison of immunogenicity induced by 10- or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine around the 11-month booster in Dutch infants. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0144739.
    1. WHO Pneumococcal vaccines WHO position paper—2012. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2012;87:129–144.
    1. Temple B, Toan NT, Uyen DY. Evaluation of different infant vaccination schedules incorporating pneumococcal vaccination (the Vietnam Pneumococcal Project): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019795.
    1. Balloch A, Licciardi PV, Leach A, Nurkka A, Tang ML. Results from an inter-laboratory comparison of pneumococcal serotype-specific IgG measurement and critical parameters that affect assay performance. Vaccine. 2010;28:1333–1340.
    1. Balloch A, Roalfe L, Ekstrom N. Interlaboratory comparison of the pneumococcal multiplex opsonophagocytic assays and their level of agreement for determination of antibody function in pediatric sera. mSphere. 2018;3:e00070–e00118.
    1. Goldblatt D, Southern J, Andrews NJ. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 13 delivered as one primary and one booster dose (1 + 1) compared with two primary doses and a booster (2 + 1) in UK infants: a multicentre, parallel group randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:171–179.
    1. Prymula R, Schuerman L. 10-valent pneumococcal nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae PD conjugate vaccine: Synflorix. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009;8:1479–1500.
    1. Nunes MC, Madhi SA. Review on the immunogenicity and safety of PCV-13 in infants and toddlers. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10:951–980.
    1. Jódar L, Butler J, Carlone G. Serological criteria for evaluation and licensure of new pneumococcal conjugate vaccine formulations for use in infants. Vaccine. 2003;21:3265–3272.
    1. Voysey M, Fanshawe TR, Kelly DF. Serotype-specific correlates of protection for pneumococcal carriage: an analysis of immunity in 19 countries. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:913–920.
    1. Andrews NJ, Waight PA, Burbidge P. Serotype-specific effectiveness and correlates of protection for the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: a postlicensure indirect cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:839–846.
    1. Dagan R, Juergens C, Trammel J. Modeling pneumococcal nasopharyngeal acquisition as a function of anticapsular serum antibody concentrations after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administration. Vaccine. 2016;34:4313–4320.
    1. Johnson HL, Deloria-Knoll M, Levine OS. Systematic evaluation of serotypes causing invasive pneumococcal disease among children under five: the pneumococcal global serotype project. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000348.
    1. Gounder PP, Bruce MG, Bruden DJ. Effect of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae–Alaska, 2008–2012. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1251–1258.
    1. Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Riahi F, Diekema DJ, Doern GV. Pneumococcal serotypes before and after introduction of conjugate vaccines, United States, 1999–2011(1.) Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1074–1083.
    1. Oligbu G, Hsia Y, Folgori L, Collins S, Ladhani S. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine failure in children: a systematic review of the literature. Vaccine. 2016;34:6126–6132.
    1. Black S, Shinefield H, Fireman B. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:187–195.
    1. De Wals P, Lefebvre B, Deceuninck G, Longtin J. Incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease before and during an era of use of three different pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Quebec. Vaccine. 2018;36:421–426.
    1. WHO Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in infants and children under 5 years of age: WHO position paper—February 2019. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2019;94:85–104.
    1. Slotved HC, Dalby T, Harboe ZB. The incidence of invasive pneumococcal serotype 3 disease in the Danish population is not reduced by PCV-13 vaccination. Heliyon. 2016;2:e00198.
    1. Tin Tin Htar M, Christopoulou D, Schmitt HJ. Pneumococcal serotype evolution in Western Europe. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:419.
    1. Yu X, Gray B, Chang S, Ward JI, Edwards KM, Nahm MH. Immunity to cross-reactive serotypes induced by pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in infants. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1569–1576.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren