Corticospinal output and loss of force during motor fatigue

Kai M Rösler, O Scheidegger, M R Magistris, Kai M Rösler, O Scheidegger, M R Magistris

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze central motor output changes in relation to contraction force during motor fatigue. The triple stimulation technique (TST, Magistris et al. in Brain 121(Pt 3):437-450, 1998) was used to quantify a central conduction index (CCI = amplitude ratio of central conduction response and peripheral nerve response, obtained simultaneously by the TST). The CCI removes effects of peripheral fatigue from the quantification. It allows a quantification of the percentage of the entire target muscle motor unit pool driven to discharge by a transcranial magnetic stimulus. Subjects (n = 23) performed repetitive maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of abductor digiti minimi (duration 1 s, frequency 0.5 Hz) during 2 min. TST recordings were obtained every 15 s, using stimulation intensities sufficient to stimulate all cortical motor neurons (MNs) leading to the target muscle, and during voluntary contractions of 20% of the MVC to facilitate the responses. TST was also repetitively recorded during recovery. This basic exercise protocol was modified in a number of experiments to further characterize influences on CCI of motor fatigue (4 min exercise at 50% MVC; delayed fatigue recovery during local hemostasis, "stimulated exercise" by 20 Hz trains of 1 s duration at 0.5 Hz during 2 min). In addition, the cortical silent period was measured during the basic exercise protocol. Force fatigued to approximately 40% of MVC in all experiments and in all subjects. In all subjects, CCI decreased during exercise, but this decrease varied markedly between subjects. On average, CCI reductions preceded force reductions during exercise, and CCI recovery preceded force recovery. Exercising at 50% for 4 min reduced muscle force more markedly than CCI. Hemostasis induced by a cuff delayed muscle force recovery, but not CCI recovery. Stimulated exercise reduced force markedly, but CCI decreased only marginally. Summarized, force reduction and reduction of the CCI related poorly quantitatively and in time, and voluntary drive was particularly critical to reduce the CCI. The fatigue induced reduction of CCI may result from a central inhibitory phenomenon. Voluntary muscle activation is critical for the CCI reduction, suggesting a primarily supraspinal mechanism.

References

    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jan;94(1):108-18
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Feb;104(2):542-50
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Aug;81(4):257-62
    1. Sports Med. 2001;31(13):935-52
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Aug;81(4):251-6
    1. Muscle Nerve. 1986 Oct;9(8):704-10
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1973 May;36(3):458-71
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:97-103
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1990 Nov;64(5):1380-9
    1. Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(2):255-62
    1. J Physiol. 2001 Aug 1;534(Pt 3):903-12
    1. Neuroreport. 1999 Feb 25;10(3):579-83
    1. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Apr;19(2):232-41
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1995;105(2):276-82
    1. J Physiol. 1999 Mar 1;515 ( Pt 2):599-607
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;116(7):1628-37
    1. Muscle Nerve. 1998 Oct;21(10):1309-16
    1. Brain. 1999 Feb;122 ( Pt 2):265-79
    1. J Physiol. 1998 Mar 15;507 ( Pt 3):919-25
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1985 May;53(5):1303-22
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jul;58(1):125-37
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:212-23
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jul;127(1):108-15
    1. Brain. 1998 Mar;121 ( Pt 3):437-50
    1. Exp Brain Res. 2000 Mar;131(1):135-43
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov;115(11):2493-501
    1. J Physiol. 1990 Oct;429:17-27
    1. J Physiol. 1986 Oct;379:451-9
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;81(3):240-2
    1. J Physiol. 2003 Aug 15;551(Pt 1):345-56
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(1):181-4
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 May;112(5):938-49
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Oct;105(5):352-6
    1. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Jul;23(7):1044-50
    1. J Physiol. 1996 Jan 15;490 ( Pt 2):519-28
    1. J Physiol. 1977 Nov;272(3):769-78
    1. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Apr;170(2):191-8
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(4):278-83
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Dec;111(12):2208-18
    1. J Physiol. 2000 Jun 15;525 Pt 3:793-801
    1. Muscle Nerve. 1996 Nov;19(11):1429-34
    1. J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:397-419
    1. J Physiol. 1999 Dec 15;521 Pt 3:749-59
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 May;92(5):2131-8
    1. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Oct;10(4):505-12
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;113(11):1680-7
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1986 Aug 4;68(3):327-33

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren