Smartphone-based financial incentives to promote smoking cessation during pregnancy: A pilot study

Allison N Kurti, Katherine Tang, Hypatia A Bolivar, Carolyn Evemy, Norman Medina, Joan Skelly, Tyler Nighbor, Stephen T Higgins, Allison N Kurti, Katherine Tang, Hypatia A Bolivar, Carolyn Evemy, Norman Medina, Joan Skelly, Tyler Nighbor, Stephen T Higgins

Abstract

Cigarette smoking during pregnancy increases risk for pregnancy complications, growth restriction, and other adverse health outcomes. The most effective intervention for reducing smoking during pregnancy is financial incentives contingent on biochemically-verified smoking abstinence. The present study examined the efficacy of a smartphone-based intervention whereby smoking monitoring and incentive delivery occurred remotely using a mobile app. If efficacious, this remote intervention would allow pregnant women residing in geographically remote areas to benefit from incentives-based cessation interventions. Sixty U.S. pregnant smokers were recruited between May 2018 to May 2019 via obstetrical clinics, Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) offices, and Facebook. Participants were assigned sequentially to one of two treatments: best practices alone (N = 30) or best practices plus financial incentives (N = 30). Outcomes were analyzed using repeated measures analysis based on generalized estimating equations (GEE). Seven-day point prevalence abstinence rates were greater in the incentives versus best practices arms early- (46.7% vs 20.0%, OR = 3.50, 95%CI = 1.11,11.02) and late-antepartum (36.7% vs 13.3%, OR = 3.76, 95%CI = 1.04,13.65), and four- (36.7% vs 10.0%, OR = 5.21, 95%CI = 1.28,21.24) and eight-weeks postpartum (40.0% vs 6.7%, OR = 9.33, 95%CI = 1.87,46.68), although not at the 12- (23.3% vs 10.0%, OR = 2.74, 95%CI = 0.63,11.82) or 24-week (20.0% vs 6.7%, OR = 3.50, 95%CI = 0.65,18.98) postpartum assessments likely due to this pilot study being underpowered for discerning differences at the later assessments, especially 24-weeks postpartum which was three months after treatment completion. These results support the efficacy of this remote, incentives-based intervention for pregnant smokers. Further research evaluating its efficacy and cost-effectiveness in a well-powered, randomized controlled trial appears warranted.

Keywords: Cigarette smoking; Financial incentives; Pregnancy; Smartphone; Smoking cessation; mHealth.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None to declare.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The flow of participants through the study. Participants were pregnant smokers recruited locally in greater Burlington, VT, and nationally via Facebook, between 2018-2019.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Map showing the reach of the intervention. Each dot on the map denotes the hometown of an individual participant.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
7-day point-prevalence abstinence rates for each treatment condition across antepartum and postpartum assessments. Participants were 60 pregnant smokers recruited locally in greater Burlington, VT, and nationally via Facebook, between 2018-2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren