Development of a nonlinear hierarchical model to describe the disposition of deuterium in mother-infant pairs to assess exclusive breastfeeding practice

Zheng Liu, Aly Diana, Christine Slater, Thomas Preston, Rosalind S Gibson, Lisa Houghton, Stephen B Duffull, Zheng Liu, Aly Diana, Christine Slater, Thomas Preston, Rosalind S Gibson, Lisa Houghton, Stephen B Duffull

Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first 6 months after birth. The deuterium oxide dose-to-the-mother (DTM) technique is used to distinguish EBF based on a cut-off (< 25 g/day) of water intake from sources other than breastmilk. This value is based on a theoretical threshold and has not been verified in field studies. The aim of this study was to estimate the water intake cut-off value that can be used to define EBF practice. One hundred and twenty-one healthy infants, aged 2.5-5.5 months who were deemed to be EBF were recruited. After administration of deuterium to the mothers, saliva was sampled from mother and infant pairs over a 14-day period. Validation of infant feeding practices was conducted via home observation over six non-consecutive days with caregiver recall. A fully Bayesian framework using a gradient-based Markov chain Monte Carlo approach implemented in Stan was used to estimate the cut-off of non-milk water intake of EBF infants. From the original data set, 113 infants were determined to be EBF and provided 1500 paired mother-infant observations. The deuterium saliva concentrations were best described by two linked 1-compartment models (mother and infant), with body weight as a covariate on the mother's volume of distribution and infant's body weight on infant's water clearance rate. The cut-off value was based on the 90th percentile of the posterior distribution of non-milk water intake and was 86.6 g/day. This cut-off value can be used in future field studies in other geographic regions to determine exclusivity of breast feeding practices in order to determine their potential public health needs.

Keywords: Bayesian; Breastfeeding; Deuterium-oxide turnover method; Human milk; MCMC; Pharmacokinetics; Stan.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
D2O disposition model for mother and infant. The term V denotes the D2O volume of distribution with subscript m and b for mother and infant; CLmb is the water clearance from mother to infant; CLbo is the water clearance from infant to out; the term CLmo represents the water clearance from mother to out
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual Visual Predictive Checks for model evaluation. Open circles are the observations. The solid lines represent the median, 2.5% and 97.5% quantiles of the posterior distribution of the model predicted response. The upper curves represent the mother and lower curves the infant. ID = 25 and 39 are later classified as EBF. ID = 1 and 12 are later classified as non-EBF
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The individual posterior densities of Rs and the Rs cut-off value (at 86.6 g/day). Black dot is the mean of individual Rs posterior distribution. Thick red line is the 25 and 75% quantiles and thin black line is the 2.5 and 97.5% quantiles (Color figure online)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The pooled probability density function of Rs and the identified cut-off value distinguishing EBF and non-EBF
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mass balance model structure of water in infant’s compartment

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, Franca GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC, Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
    1. World Health Organization . The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. International Food Policy Research Institute (2015) Global Nutrition Report 2015: actions and accountability to advance nutrition and sustainable development. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. . Accessed 22 Mar 2018
    1. Piwoz EG, Creed de Kanashiro H, Lopez de Romana G, Black RE, Brown KH. Potential for misclassification of infants’ usual feeding practices using 24-hour dietary assessment methods. J Nutr. 1995;125:57–65.
    1. World Health Organization: indicators for assessing breast-feeding practices: Reprinted report of an informal meeting, 11–12 June 1991 Geneva
    1. Menon P, Nguyen PH, Saha KK, Khaled A, Kennedy A, Tran LM, Sanghvi T, Hajeebhoy N, Baker J, Alayon S, Afsana K, Haque R, Frongillo EA, Ruel MT, Rawat R. Impacts on breastfeeding practices of at-scale strategies that combine intensive interpersonal counseling, mass media and community mobilization: results of cluster-randomized program evaluations in Bangladesh and Vietnam. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002159.
    1. Moore SE, Prentice AM, Coward WA, Wright A, Frongillo EA, Fulford AJC, Mander AP, Persson L-A, Arifeen SE, Kabir I. Use of stable-isotope techniques to validate infant feeding practices reported by Bangladeshi women receiving breastfeeding counselling. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1075–1082. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.4.1075.
    1. Samuel TM, Thomas T, Bhat S, Kurpad AV. Are infants born in baby-friendly hospitals being exclusively breastfed until 6 months of age? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66:459–465. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.179.
    1. Medoua GN, Nana ECS, Ndzana CA, Mkamto CS, Etame LS, Rikong HA, Oyono JLE. Breastfeeding practices of Cameroonian mothers determine by dietary recall since birth and the dose-to-the-mother deuterium-oxide turnover technique. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8:330–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00293.x.
    1. Mazariegos S, Chacón V, Cole A, Barnoya J. Nutritional quality and marketing strategies of fast food children’s combo meals in Guatemala. BMC Obes. 2016;3:52. doi: 10.1186/s40608-016-0136-y.
    1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2010) Stable isotope technique to assess intake of human milk in breastfed infants. IAEA human health series, ISSN 20175; no. 7. Vienna, Austria
    1. Stan Manual (2016) Modeling Language User’s Guide and Reference Manual, Version 2.12.0.
    1. Hoffman MD, Gelman A. The no-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15:1593–1623.
    1. Lunn DJ, Best N, Thomas A, Wakefield J, Spiegelhalter D. Bayesian analysis of population PK/PD models: general concepts and software. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2002;29:271–307. doi: 10.1023/A:1020206907668.
    1. Duffull SB, Kirkpatrick CMJ, Green B, Holford NHG. Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data using NONMEM and WinBUGS. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15:53–73. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200040824.
    1. Wendling T, Dumitras S, Ogungbenro K, Aarons L. Application of a Bayesian approach to physiological modelling of mavoglurant population pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015;42(6):639–657. doi: 10.1007/s10928-015-9430-4.
    1. Wendling T, Tsamandouras N, Dumitras S, Pigeolet E, Ogungbenro K, Aarons L. Reduction of a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to stabilise the Bayesian analysis of clinical data. AAPS J. 2016;18(1):196–209. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9840-7.
    1. WHO . Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Part 1: definitions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Maguire RP, Spyrou NM, Leenders KL. Whole body [O-15] water pharmacokinetics measured in blood. Physiol Meas. 2003;24(2):237–249. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/301.
    1. Shipley RA, Clark RE. Tracer methods for in vivo kinetics. Theory and applications. New York, London: Academic Press; 1972.
    1. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, Heitmann BL, Kent-Smith L, Melchior JC, Pirlich M, Scharfetter H, Schols AM, Pichard C, Composition of the ESPEN Working Group Bioelectrical impedance analysis—Part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004.
    1. Gibney MJ, Walsh M, Brennan L, Roche HM, German B, van Ommen B. Metabolomics in human nutrition: opportunities and challenges. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(3):497–503. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/82.3.497.
    1. Kreuzer-Martin HW, Lott MJ, Ehleringer JR, Hegg EL. Metabolic processes account for the majority of the intracellular water in log-phase Escherichia coli cells as revealed by hydrogen isotopes. Biochemistry. 2006;45(45):13622–13630. doi: 10.1021/bi0609164.
    1. Charra B. Fluid balance, dry weight, and blood pressure in dialysis. Hemodial Int. 2007;11(1):21–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00148.x.
    1. Haisma H, Coward WA, Albernaz E, Visser H, Wells JCK, Wright A, Victora CG. Breast milk and energy intake in exclusively, predominantly and partially breast-fed infants. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57:1633–1642. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601735.
    1. Wells JC, Davies PS. Correction for environmental water influx in measurement of milk volume intake by deuterium turnover in infants. Early Hum Dev. 1995;41:177–182. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(95)01623-B.
    1. Coward WA, Cole TJ, Sawyer MB, Prentice AM. Breast-milk intake measurement in mixed-fed infants by administration of deuterium oxide to their mothers. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1982;36:141–148.
    1. Orr-Ewing AK, Heywood PF, Coward WA. Longitudinal measurements of breast milk output by a 2H2O tracer technique in rural Papua New Guinean women. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1986;40:451–467.
    1. Lewandowski D, Kurowicka D, Joe H. Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method. J Multivar Anal. 2009;100:p1989. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008.
    1. Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and term breast milk. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-216.
    1. Morrison SD. A method for the calculation of metabolic water. J Physiol. 1953;122(2):399–402. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005009.
    1. Mellanby K. Metabolic water and desiccation. Nature. 1942;150:21. doi: 10.1038/150021a0.
    1. Wells JCK, Fewtrell MS, Davies PSW, Williams JE, Coward WA, Cole TJ. Prediction of total body water in infants and children. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:965–971. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.067538.
    1. Horita J, Wesolowski DJ. Liquid-vapor fractionation of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes of water from the freezing to the critical temperature. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1994;58:3425–3437. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90096-5.
    1. . Accessed May 2018
    1. . Accessed May 2018
    1. Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput. 2017;27:1413–1432. doi: 10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4.
    1. van der Linde A. DIC in variable selection. Stat Neerl. 2005;1:45–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00278.x.
    1. Plummer M. Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison. Biostatistics. 2008;9:523–539. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm049.
    1. Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J (2016) Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC.
    1. Lunn DJ, Wakefield J, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (1999) PKBugs User Guide: Vol Version 1.1. Imperial College, London
    1. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci. 1992;7(4):457–472. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136.
    1. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2013.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren