Efficacy of Curcumin on Treating Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome in Locally or Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomised Phase IIa Trial (CurChexia)

Tawasapon Thambamroong, Kasan Seetalarom, Siriwimon Saichaemchan, Yanisa Pumsutas, Naiyarat Prasongsook, Tawasapon Thambamroong, Kasan Seetalarom, Siriwimon Saichaemchan, Yanisa Pumsutas, Naiyarat Prasongsook

Abstract

Background: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CAS) is a significant comorbidity among all patients with cancer, increasing the mortality rate. Almost all patients with head and neck cancer experience this syndrome. CAS causes increased energy expenditure by increasing systemic inflammation and decreasing energy consumption due to anorexia. It leads to skeleton muscle breakdown and reduces the quality of life. Nutritional interventions and primary cancer treatment are the mainstays to manage this situation. However, a vicious cycle causes CAS to persist, especially in head and neck cancer, where tumour location and its treatment interfere with nutritional interventions. Curcumin shows anti-inflammatory effects, including modulated CAS in animal and in vitro studies.

Objective: The study aimed to determine the effect of curcumin to treat cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome among current patients with locally advanced or advanced head and neck cancer.

Methods: This constitutes a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa study. Twenty patients with CAS in locally advanced or advanced head and neck cancer adequately nourished via a feeding tube were enrolled and randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive oral curcumin (at a dose of 4000 mg daily) (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was body composition (muscle mass, body fat mass, and basal metabolic rate). The secondary endpoints were handgrip muscle strength, body mass index, absolute lymphocyte count, and safety and toxicity.

Result: There was a statistically significant benefit from curcumin on improving muscle mass compared with placebo (2.16% [95% confidence interval; CI, -0.75 to 5.07] vs. -3.82% [95% CI, -8.2 to 0.57]; P=0.019). The other parameters of body composition were not significant but tended to favour curcumin benefit. The body fat mass (-0.51 [95% CI, -21.89 to 20.86] vs. -8.97% [95% CI, -19.43 to 1.49]; P=0.432) and percentage of mean change in the basal metabolic rate were noted (BMR) (0.54% [95% CI, -1.6 to 2.67] vs. -1.61% [95% CI, -4.05 to 0.84]; P=0.153). Notably, patients treated with curcumin exhibited less reduction in handgrip muscle strength and absolute lymphocyte count but was not significant. Similarly, most adverse events were grade 1 in both groups.

Conclusion: The curcumin add-on resulted in a significant increase in muscle mass than standard nutritional support. Furthermore, it may improve and delay a decrease in the other body composition parameters, handgrip strength, and absolute lymphocyte count. Curcumin was safe and well tolerated. This constitutes an unmet need for clinical trials. This trial is registered with NCT04208334.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Copyright © 2022 Tawasapon Thambamroong et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort flow diagram showing patients included in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison between the primary outcomes on the percentage of mean change of muscle mass, body fat mass, and basal metabolic rate between the curcumin and placebo groups. statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between the secondary outcomes on the percentage of mean change in handgrip strength, body mass index, and absolute lymphocyte count between the curcumin and placebo groups, statistically significant (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Fearon K., Strasser F., Anker S. D., et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. The Lancet Oncology . 2011;12(5):489–495. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70218-7.
    1. Laviano A., Seelaender M., Sanchez-Lara K., Gioulbasanis I., Molfino A., Fanelli F. R. Beyond anorexia -cachexia. Nutrition and modulation of cancer patients’ metabolism: supplementary, complementary or alternative anti-neoplastic therapy? European Journal of Pharmacology . 2011;668:S87–S90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.06.060.
    1. Dewys W. D., Begg C., Lavin P. T., et al. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior tochemotherapy in cancer patients. The American Journal of Medicine . 1980;69(4):491–497. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3.
    1. Teunissen S. C. C. M., Wesker W., Kruitwagen C., de Haes H. C. J. M., Voest E. E., de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management . 2007;34(1):94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015.
    1. Evans W. K., Makuch R., Clamon G. H., et al. Limited impact of total parenteral nutrition on nutritional status during treatment for small cell lung cancer. Cancer Research . 1985;45(7):3347–3353.
    1. Argilés J. M., Busquets S., Stemmler B., López-Soriano F. J. Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis. Nature Reviews Cancer . 2014;14(11):754–762. doi: 10.1038/nrc3829.
    1. Solis-Martinez O., Alvarez-Altamirano K., Cardenas D., Trujillo-Cabrera Y., Fuchs-Tarlovsky V. Cancer cachexia affects patients with head and neck cancer in all stages of disease: a prospective cross-sectional study. Nutrition and Cancer . 2021;74:82–89. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1869792.
    1. Muscaritoli M., Arends J., Bachmann P., et al. ESPEN practical guideline: clinical Nutrition in cancer. Clinical Nutrition . 2021;40(5):2898–2913. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005.
    1. Currow D. C., Glare P., Louw S., et al. A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of megestrol acetate or dexamethasone in treating symptomatic anorexia in people with advanced cancer. Scientific Reports . 2021;11(1):p. 2421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82120-8.
    1. Saeteaw M., Sanguanboonyaphong P., Yoodee J., et al. Efficacy and safety of pharmacological cachexia interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care . 2021;11(1):75–85. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002601.
    1. Puigserver P., Rhee J., Lin J., et al. Cytokine stimulation of energy expenditure through p38 MAP kinase activation of PPARγ coactivator-1. Molecular Cell . 2001;8(5):971–982. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00390-2.
    1. Martin L., Birdsell L., Macdonald N., et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2013;31(12):1539–1547. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.2722.
    1. Meriggi F. Cancer cachexia: one step ahead. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials . 2015;10(3):246–250. doi: 10.2174/1574887110666150916141351.
    1. Argilés J. M., López-Soriano F. J. The ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway in skeletal muscle: its role in pathological states. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences . 1996;17(6):223–226. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(96)10021-3.
    1. Constantinou C., Fontes de Oliveira C. C., Mintzopoulos D., et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance in conjunction with functional genomics suggests mitochondrial dysfunction in a murine model of cancer cachexia. International Journal of Molecular Medicine . 2011;27(1):15–24. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2010.557.
    1. Srivastava D. S., Dhaulakhandi D. B. Role of NF-KB in loss of skeletal muscle mass in cancer cachexia and its therapeutic targets. American Journal of Cancer Biology . 2013;1(1):p. 16.
    1. Siddiqui R. A., Hassan S., Harvey K. A., et al. Attenuation of proteolysis and muscle wasting by curcumin c3 complex in MAC16 colon tumour-bearing mice. British Journal of Nutrition . 2009;102(7):967–975. doi: 10.1017/s0007114509345250.
    1. Gil da Costa R. M., Aragão S., Moutinho M., et al. HPV16 induces a wasting syndrome in transgenic mice: amelioration by dietary polyphenols via NF-κB inhibition. Life Sciences . 2017;169:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.10.031.
    1. Panahi Y., Saadat A., Beiraghdar F., Sahebkar A. Adjuvant therapy with bioavailability-boosted curcuminoids suppresses systemic inflammation and improves quality of life in patients with solid tumors: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Phytotherapy Research . 2014;28(10):1461–1467. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5149.
    1. Prasongsook N., Sitalarom K., Saichaemchan S., Peechatanan K., Chaiworramukkul A. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized phase II study: evaluating the effect of curcumin for treatment of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome in solid cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2019;37 doi: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e23151.e23151
    1. Reagan-Shaw S., Nihal M., Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. The FASEB Journal . 2008;22(3):659–661. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9574lsf.
    1. Bera T. K. Bioelectrical impedance methods for noninvasive health monitoring: a review. Journal of Medical Engineering . 2014;2014:28. doi: 10.1155/2014/381251.381251
    1. Crawford J. What are the criteria for response to cachexia treatment? Annals of Palliative Medicine . 2019;8(1):43–49. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.12.08.
    1. Busquets S., Carbó N., Almendro V., Quiles M. T., López-Soriano F. J., Argilés J. M. Curcumin, a natural product present in turmeric, decreases tumor growth but does not behave as an anticachectic compound in a rat model. Cancer Letters . 2001;167(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00456-6.
    1. Sharma R. A., McLelland H. R., Hill K. A., et al. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of oral Curcuma extract in patients with colorectal cancer. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research . 2001;7(7):1894–1900.
    1. Cheng A. L., Hsu C. H., Lin J. K., et al. Phase I clinical trial of curcumin, a chemopreventive agent, in patients with high-risk or pre-malignant lesions. Anticancer Research . 2001;21:2895–2900.
    1. Sharma R. A., Euden S. A., Platton S. L., et al. Phase I clinical trial of oral curcumin. Clinical Cancer Research . 2004;10(20):6847–6854. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0744.
    1. Fabbri E., Chiles Shaffer N., Gonzalez-Freire M., et al. Early body composition, but not body mass, is associated with future accelerated decline in muscle quality. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle . 2017;8(3):490–499. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12183.
    1. Chen L., Nelson D. R., Zhao Y., Cui Z., Johnston J. A. Relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength, and the impact of comorbidities: a population-based, cross-sectional study of older adults in the United States. BMC Geriatrics . 2013;13(1):p. 74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-74.
    1. Yue G. G. L., Chan B. C. L., Hon P.-M., et al. Evaluation of in vitro anti-proliferative and immunomodulatory activities of compounds isolated from Curcuma longa. Food and Chemical Toxicology . 2010;48:2011–2020. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.039.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren