Physical and psychosocial risk factors for lateral epicondylitis: a population based case-referent study

J P Haahr, J H Andersen, J P Haahr, J H Andersen

Abstract

Aims: To assess the importance of physical and psychosocial risk factors for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow).

Methods: Case-referent study of 267 new cases of tennis elbow and 388 referents from the background population enrolled from general practices in Ringkjoebing County, Denmark.

Results: Manual job tasks were associated with tennis elbow (odds ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 5.1). The self reported physical risk factors "posture" and "forceful work" were related to tennis elbow. Among women, work involving performing repeated movements of the arms was related to tennis elbow (OR 3.7, CI 1.7 to 8.3). Among men, work with precision demanding movements was related to tennis elbow (OR 5.2, CI 1.5 to 17.9). Among both males and females, the results for work with hand held vibrating tools were inconsistent, partly because of few exposed subjects. A physical strain index was established based on posture, repetition, and force. The adjusted ORs for tennis elbow at low, medium, and high strain were 1.4 (CI 0.8 to 2.7), 2.0 (CI 1.1 to 3.7), and 4.4 (CI 2.3 to 8.7). Low social support at work, adjusted for physical strain, was a risk factor among women (OR 2.4, CI 1.3 to 4.6).

Conclusion: Results indicate that being a new case of tennis elbow is associated with non-neutral postures of hands and arms, use of heavy hand held tools, and high physical strain measured as a combination of forceful work, non-neutral posture of hands and arms, and repetition. Furthermore, tennis elbow among women was associated with low social support at work. The results for precision demanding movements and for vibration were less consistent.

References

    1. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Apr;51(4):262-6
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Jan;53(1):30-4
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Apr;21(2):134-42
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 1996 Feb;38(2):190-201
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Dec;21(6):478-86
    1. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Mar;55(3):172-9
    1. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Apr;55(4):264-71
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1999 May;35(5):441-55
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Jun;25(3):246-54
    1. BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):676-9
    1. Scand J Rheumatol. 1974;3(3):145-53
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1979;5 suppl 3:25-38
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984 Jun;10(3):203-5
    1. Ergonomics. 1987 Mar;30(3):573-9
    1. J Occup Med. 1989 May;31(5):447-53
    1. J Rheumatol. 1990 Jul;17(7):958-64
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Feb;17(1):38-45
    1. Scand J Soc Med. 1992 Mar;20(1):31-6
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Jun;19(3):208-14
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1995 May;27(5):731-47

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren