Bedaquiline, moxifloxacin, pretomanid, and pyrazinamide during the first 8 weeks of treatment of patients with drug-susceptible or drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicentre, open-label, partially randomised, phase 2b trial

Conor D Tweed, Rodney Dawson, Divan A Burger, Almari Conradie, Angela M Crook, Carl M Mendel, Francesca Conradie, Andreas H Diacon, Nyanda E Ntinginya, Daniel E Everitt, Frederick Haraka, Mengchun Li, Christo H van Niekerk, Alphonse Okwera, Mohammed S Rassool, Klaus Reither, Modulakgotla A Sebe, Suzanne Staples, Ebrahim Variava, Melvin Spigelman, Conor D Tweed, Rodney Dawson, Divan A Burger, Almari Conradie, Angela M Crook, Carl M Mendel, Francesca Conradie, Andreas H Diacon, Nyanda E Ntinginya, Daniel E Everitt, Frederick Haraka, Mengchun Li, Christo H van Niekerk, Alphonse Okwera, Mohammed S Rassool, Klaus Reither, Modulakgotla A Sebe, Suzanne Staples, Ebrahim Variava, Melvin Spigelman

Abstract

Background: New anti-tuberculosis regimens that are shorter, simpler, and less toxic than those that are currently available are needed as part of the global effort to address the tuberculosis epidemic. We aimed to investigate the bactericidal activity and safety profile of combinations of bedaquiline, pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide in the first 8 weeks of treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, partially randomised, phase 2b trial, we prospectively recruited patients with drug-susceptible or rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis from seven sites in South Africa, two in Tanzania, and one in Uganda. Patients aged 18 years or older with sputum smear grade 1+ or higher were eligible for enrolment, and a molecular assay (GeneXpert or MTBDRplus) was used to confirm the diagnosis of tuberculosis and to distinguish between drug-susceptible and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Patients who were HIV positive with a baseline CD4 cell count of less than 100 cells per uL were excluded. Patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using numbered treatment packs with sequential allocation by the pharmacist to receive 56 days of treatment with standard tuberculosis therapy (oral isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; HRZE), or pretomanid (oral 200 mg daily) and pyrazinamide (oral 1500 mg daily) with either oral bedaquiline 400 mg daily on days 1-14 then 200 mg three times per week (BloadPaZ) or oral bedaquiline 200 mg daily (B200PaZ). Patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis received 56 days of the B200PaZ regimen plus moxifloxacin 400 mg daily (BPaMZ). All treatment groups were open label, and randomisation was not stratified. Patients, trial investigators and staff, pharmacists or dispensers, laboratory staff (with the exception of the mycobacteriology laboratory staff), sponsor staff, and applicable contract research organisations were not masked. The primary efficacy outcome was daily percentage change in time to sputum culture positivity (TTP) in liquid medium over days 0-56 in the drug-susceptible tuberculosis population, based on non-linear mixed-effects regression modelling of log10 (TTP) over time. The efficacy analysis population contained patients who received at least one dose of medication and who had efficacy data available and had no major protocol violations. The safety population contained patients who received at least one dose of medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02193776, and all patients have completed follow-up.

Findings: Between Oct 24, 2014, and Dec 15, 2015, we enrolled 180 patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (59 were randomly assigned to BloadPaZ, 60 to B200PaZ, and 61 to HRZE) and 60 patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. 57 patients in the BloadPaZ group, 56 in the B200PaZ group, and 59 in the HRZE group were included in the primary analysis. B200PaZ produced the highest daily percentage change in TTP (5·17% [95% Bayesian credibility interval 4·61-5·77]), followed by BloadPaZ (4·87% [4·31-5·47]) and HRZE group (4·04% [3·67-4·42]). The bactericidal activity in B200PaZ and BloadPaZ groups versus that in the HRZE group was significantly different. Higher proportions of patients in the BloadPaZ (six [10%] of 59) and B200PaZ (five [8%] of 60) groups discontinued the study drug than in the HRZE group (two [3%] of 61) because of adverse events. Liver enzyme elevations were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events and resulted in the withdrawal of ten patients (five [8%] in the BloadPaZ group, three [5%] in the B200PaZ group, and two [3%] in the HRZE group). Serious treatment-related adverse events affected two (3%) patients in the BloadPaZ group and one (2%) patient in the HRZE group. Seven (4%) patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis died and four (7%) patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis died. None of the deaths were considered to be related to treatment.

Interpretation: B200PaZ is a promising regimen to treat patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. The bactericidal activity of both these regimens suggests that they have the potential to shorten treatment, and the simplified dosing schedule of B200PaZ could improve treatment adherence in the field. However, these findings must be investigated further in a phase 3 trial assessing treatment outcomes.

Funding: TB Alliance, UK Department for International Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, US Agency for International Development, Directorate General for International Cooperation of the Netherlands, Irish Aid, Australia Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and the Federal Ministry for Education and Research of Germany.

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile Full listings of the reasons for screening failure are available in the appendix (p 7). AFB=acid-fast bacilli. ALT=alanine aminotransferase. AST=aspartate aminotransferase. BloadPaZ=bedaquiline (loading dose), pretomanid, and pyrazinamide. B200PaZ=bedaquiline (daily dose), pretomanid, and pyrazinamide. BPaMZ=bedaquiline (daily dose), pretomanid, and pyrazinamide plus moxifloxacin. HRZE=isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. *Primary reason for withdrawal during treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves of time to liquid (A) and solid (B) media sputum culture conversion the efficacy analysis population Patients censored at last available valid sample day if no sample was collected at day 56. (A) The difference between B200PaZ versus HRZE with respect to the cumulative probability of liquid media sputum culture conversion is significant. No other differences between treatment groups were significant. (B) No differences between treatment groups were significant with respect to the cumulative probability of solid media sputum culture conversion. p values calculated from a log-rank test for comparison of median time to liquid media sputum culture conversion. BloadPaZ=bedaquiline (loading dose), pretomanid, and pyrazinamide. B200PaZ=bedaquiline (daily dose), pretomanid, and pyrazinamide. BPaMZ=bedaquiline (daily dose), pretomanid, and pyrazinamide plus moxifloxacin. HR=hazard ratio. HRZE=isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol.

References

    1. WHO Global Tuberculosis Report. 2017.
    1. Fox W, Ellard GA, Mitchison DA. Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council Tuberculosis Units, 1946–1986, with relevant subsequent publications. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3:S231–S279.
    1. Floyd K, Glaziou P, Zumla A, Raviglione M. The global tuberculosis epidemic and progress in care, prevention, and research: an overview in year 3 of the End TB era. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:299–314.
    1. Banda H, Kang'ombe C, Harries AD. Mortality rates and recurrent rates of tuberculosis in patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis and tuberculous pleural effusion who have completed treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000;4:968–974.
    1. Hargreaves NJ, Kadzakumanja O, Whitty CJM, Salaniponi FML, Harries AD, Squire SB. ‘Smear-negative’ pulmonary tuberculosis in a DOTS programme: poor outcomes in an area of high HIV seroprevalence. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5:847–854.
    1. Dworkin MS, Adams MR, Cohn DL. Factors that complicate the treatment of tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39:464–470.
    1. Yee D, Valiquette C, Pelletier M, Parisien I, Rocher I, Menzies D. Incidence of serious side effects from first-line antituberculosis drugs among patients treated for active tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1472–1547.
    1. WHO Rapid Communication: key changes to treatment of multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) August, 2018.
    1. Rustomjee R, Lienhardt C, Kanyok T. A phase II study of the sterilising activities of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:128–138.
    1. Conde MB, Efron A, Loredo C. Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the initial treatment of tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomised, controlled phase II trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1183–1189.
    1. Burman WJ, Goldberg S, Johnson JL. Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the first 2 months of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Med Crit Care. 2006;174:331–338.
    1. Dorman SE, Johnson JL, Goldberg S. Substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:273–280.
    1. Dawson R, Diacon AH, Everitt D. Efficiency and safety of the combination of moxifloxacin, pretomanid (PA-824), and pyrazinamide during the first 8 weeks of antituberculosis treatment: a phase 2b, open-label, partly randomised trial in patients with drug-susceptible or drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet. 2015;385:1738–1748.
    1. Diacon AH, Pym A, Grobusch MP. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and culture conversion with bedaquiline. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:723–732.
    1. Diacon AH, Dawson R, Von Groote-Bidlingmaier F. Bactericidal activity of pyrazinamide and clofazimine alone and in combinations with pretomanid and bedaquiline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:943–953.
    1. Stinson KW, Eisenach K, Siddiqi S, editors. Mycobacteriology Laboratory Manual. Global Laboratory Initiative—a Working Group of the Stop TB Partnership; Geneva: 2014.
    1. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) Adult Toxicity Table November 2007 draft.
    1. Burger DA, Schall R, Chen D-G. Robust Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of time to positivity in tuberculosis trials. Pharm Stat. 2018;17:615–628.
    1. Burger DA, Schall R. Robust fit of Bayesian mixed effects regression models with application to colony forming unit count in tuberculosis research. Stat Med. 2018;37:544–556.
    1. Burger DA, Schall R. A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects regression model for the characterization of early bactericidal activity of tuberculosis drugs. J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25:1247–1271.
    1. Borisov SE, Dheda K, Enwerem M. Effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB: a multicentre study. Eur Respir J. 2017;49
    1. Ndjeka N, Schnippel K, Master I. High treatment success rate for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis using a bedaquiline-containing treatment regimen. Eur Respir J. 2018;52
    1. Fregonese F, Ahuja SD, Akkerman OW. Comparison of different treatments for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:265–275.
    1. Maartens G, Celum C, Lewin SR. HIV infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Lancet. 2014;384:258–271.
    1. Egelund EF, Dupree L, Huesgen E, Peloquin CA. The pharmacological challenges of treating tuberculosis and HIV coinfections. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017;10:213–223.
    1. Manosuthi W, Wiboonchutikul S, Sungkanuparph S. Integrated therapy for HIV and tuberculosis. AIDS Res Ther. 2016;13:22.
    1. Bastos ML, Hussain H, Weyer K. Treatment outcomes of patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis according to drug susceptibility testing to first- and second-line drugs: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1364–1374.
    1. Whitfield MG, Soeters HM, Warren RM. A global perspective on pyrazinamide resistance: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10
    1. Ingersoll KS, Cohen J. The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: a review of literature. J Behav Med. 2008;31:213–224.
    1. Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2
    1. Pontali E, Sotgiu G, Tiberi S, D'Ambrosio L, Centis R, Migliori GB. Cardiac safety of bedaquiline: a systematic and critical analysis of the evidence. Eur Respir J. 2017;50
    1. Tweed CD, Crook AM, Amukoye EI. Liver toxicity associated with tuberculosis chemotherapy in the REMoxTB study. BMC Med. 2018;16:46.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren