Exploring the Effects of In-App Components on Engagement With a Symptom-Tracking Platform Among Participants With Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-Engage): Protocol for a 2-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

Katie M White, Faith Matcham, Daniel Leightley, Ewan Carr, Pauline Conde, Erin Dawe-Lane, Yatharth Ranjan, Sara Simblett, Claire Henderson, Matthew Hotopf, Katie M White, Faith Matcham, Daniel Leightley, Ewan Carr, Pauline Conde, Erin Dawe-Lane, Yatharth Ranjan, Sara Simblett, Claire Henderson, Matthew Hotopf

Abstract

Background: Multi-parametric remote measurement technologies (RMTs) comprise smartphone apps and wearable devices for both active and passive symptom tracking. They hold potential for understanding current depression status and predicting future depression status. However, the promise of using RMTs for relapse prediction is heavily dependent on user engagement, which is defined as both a behavioral and experiential construct. A better understanding of how to promote engagement in RMT research through various in-app components will aid in providing scalable solutions for future remote research, higher quality results, and applications for implementation in clinical practice.

Objective: The aim of this study is to provide the rationale and protocol for a 2-armed randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of insightful notifications, progress visualization, and researcher contact details on behavioral and experiential engagement with a multi-parametric mobile health data collection platform, Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse (RADAR)-base.

Methods: We aim to recruit 140 participants upon completion of their participation in the RADAR Major Depressive Disorder study in the London site. Data will be collected using 3 weekly tasks through an active smartphone app, a passive (background) data collection app, and a Fitbit device. Participants will be randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to receive either an adapted version of the active app that incorporates insightful notifications, progress visualization, and access to researcher contact details or the active app as usual. Statistical tests will be used to assess the hypotheses that participants using the adapted app will complete a higher percentage of weekly tasks (behavioral engagement: primary outcome) and score higher on self-awareness measures (experiential engagement).

Results: Recruitment commenced in April 2021. Data collection was completed in September 2021. The results of this study will be communicated via publication in 2022.

Conclusions: This study aims to understand how best to promote engagement with RMTs in depression research. The findings will help determine the most effective techniques for implementation in both future rounds of the RADAR Major Depressive Disorder study and, in the long term, clinical practice.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04972474; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04972474.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/32653.

Keywords: app; engagement; major depressive disorder; mobile phone; remote measurement technologies; research.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: MH is the principal investigator of the RADAR-CNS consortium, a private-public pre-competitive consortium with research funding from Janssen, UCB, MSD, Biogen and Lundbeck. No further conflicts are declared.

©Katie M White, Faith Matcham, Daniel Leightley, Ewan Carr, Pauline Conde, Erin Dawe-Lane, Yatharth Ranjan, Sara Simblett, Claire Henderson, Matthew Hotopf. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 21.12.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design from screening to follow-up end point, including time points 0, 1, and 2. RADAR-MDD: Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Service user involvement in the design of the adapted app. RMT: remote measurement technology.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screenshots of the in-app components included in the adapted app.

References

    1. Liao Y, Thompson C, Peterson S, Mandrola J, Beg MS. The future of wearable technologies and remote monitoring in health care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:115–21. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_238919.
    1. Matcham F, Barattieri di San Pietro C, Bulgari V, de Girolamo G, Dobson R, Eriksson H, Folarin AA, Haro JM, Kerz M, Lamers F, Li Q, Manyakov NV, Mohr DC, Myin-Germeys I, Narayan V, Bwjh P, Ranjan Y, Rashid Z, Rintala A, Siddi S, Simblett SK, Wykes T, Hotopf M, RADAR-CNS consortium, et al Remote assessment of disease and relapse in major depressive disorder (RADAR-MDD): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z. 10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z
    1. Jones M, Johnston D. Understanding phenomena in the real world: the case for real time data collection in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16(3):172–6. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010016.jhsrp.2010.010016
    1. Naslund JA, Marsch LA, McHugo GJ, Bartels SJ. Emerging mHealth and eHealth interventions for serious mental illness: a review of the literature. J Ment Health. 2015;24(5):321–32. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1019054.
    1. Verduijn J, Verhoeven JE, Milaneschi Y, Schoevers RA, van Hemert AM, Beekman AT, Penninx BW. Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: full recovery is the exception rather than the rule. BMC Med. 2017 Dec 12;15(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8. 10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8
    1. Greenberg PE, Fournier A-A, Sisitsky T, Simes M, Berman R, Koenigsberg SH, Kessler RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018) Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jun;39(6):653–65. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01019-4. 10.1007/s40273-021-01019-4
    1. Gauthier G, Mucha L, Shi S, Guerin A. Economic burden of relapse/recurrence in patients with major depressive disorder. J Drug Assess. 2019;8(1):97–103. doi: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1612410. 1612410
    1. Mohr DC, Zhang M, Schueller SM. Personal sensing: understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 08;13:23–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-044949.
    1. Burchert S, Kerber A, Zimmermann J, Knaevelsrud C. Screening accuracy of a 14-day smartphone ambulatory assessment of depression symptoms and mood dynamics in a general population sample: comparison with the PHQ-9 depression screening. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244955. PONE-D-19-24772
    1. Moshe I, Terhorst Y, Opoku Asare K, Sander LB, Ferreira D, Baumeister H, Mohr DC, Pulkki-Råback L. Predicting symptoms of depression and anxiety using smartphone and wearable data. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 28;12:625247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.625247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.625247.
    1. Wells JE, Horwood LJ. How accurate is recall of key symptoms of depression? A comparison of recall and longitudinal reports. Psychol Med. 2004 Aug;34(6):1001–11. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703001843.
    1. RADAR-CNS: Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse – Central Nervous System. RADAR-CNS. [2021-12-05].
    1. Ranjan Y, Rashid Z, Stewart C, Conde P, Begale M, Verbeeck D, Boettcher S, Hyve. Dobson R, Folarin A, RADAR-CNS Consortium RADAR-Base: open source mobile health platform for collecting, monitoring, and analyzing data using sensors, wearables, and mobile devices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 01;7(8):e11734. doi: 10.2196/11734. v7i8e11734
    1. Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254–67. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1. 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1
    1. Simblett S, Matcham F, Siddi S, Bulgari V, Barattieri di San Pietro C, Hortas López J, Ferrão J, Polhemus A, Haro JM, de Girolamo G, Gamble P, Eriksson H, Hotopf M, Wykes T, RADAR-CNS Consortium Barriers to and facilitators of engagement with mHealth technology for remote measurement and management of depression: qualitative analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 30;7(1):e11325. doi: 10.2196/11325. v7i1e11325
    1. Girolamo G, Barattieri di San Pietro C, Bulgari V, Dagani J, Ferrari C, Hotopf M, Iannone G, Macis A, Matcham F, Myin‐Germeys I, Rintala A, Simblett S, Wykes T, Zarbo C. The acceptability of real‐time health monitoring among community participants with depression: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature. Depression Anxiety. 2020 Apr 27;37(9):885–97. doi: 10.1002/da.23023.
    1. A Framework for Recruiting into a Remote Measurement Technologies (RMTs) study: experiences from a major depressive disorder cohort. Center for Open Science. [2021-12-05].
    1. Anguera JA, Jordan JT, Castaneda D, Gazzaley A, Areán PA. Conducting a fully mobile and randomised clinical trial for depression: access, engagement and expense. BMJ Innov. 2016 Jan;2(1):14–21. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000098. bmjinnov-2015-000098
    1. Arean PA, Hallgren KA, Jordan JT, Gazzaley A, Atkins DC, Heagerty PJ, Anguera JA. The use and effectiveness of mobile apps for depression: results from a fully remote clinical trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 20;18(12):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6482. v18i12e330
    1. Simblett S, Greer B, Matcham F, Curtis H, Polhemus A, Ferrão J, Gamble P, Wykes T. Barriers to and facilitators of engagement with remote measurement technology for managing health: systematic review and content analysis of findings. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 12;20(7):e10480. doi: 10.2196/10480. v20i7e10480
    1. Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD): recruitment, retention, and data availability in a longitudinal remote measurement study. Research Square. [2021-12-05].
    1. Ranjan Y, Folarin AA, Stewart C, Conde P, Dobson R, Rashid Z. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers; UbiComp '19: The 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; Sep 9 - 13, 2019; London United Kingdom. 2019.
    1. Teague S, Youssef GJ, Macdonald JA, Sciberras E, Shatte A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Greenwood C, McIntosh J, Olsson CA, Hutchinson D, SEED Lifecourse Sciences Theme, et al Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7. 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7
    1. Druce KL, Dixon WG, McBeth J. Maximizing engagement in mobile health studies: lessons learned and future directions. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2019 May;45(2):159–72. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2019.01.004. S0889-857X(19)30004-3
    1. Van Til K, McInnis MG, Cochran A. A comparative study of engagement in mobile and wearable health monitoring for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2020 Mar;22(2):182–90. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12849.
    1. Bidargaddi N, Almirall D, Murphy S, Nahum-Shani I, Kovalcik M, Pituch T, Maaieh H, Strecher V. To prompt or not to prompt? A microrandomized trial of time-varying push notifications to increase proximal engagement with a mobile health app. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 29;6(11):e10123. doi: 10.2196/10123. v6i11e10123
    1. Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity. 2002 Dec;2002(December):2. doi: 10.1145/764008.763957.
    1. Bentley F, Tollmar K. The power of mobile notifications to increase wellbeing logging behavior. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Apr 27 - May 2, 2013; Paris, France. 2013.
    1. Bidargaddi N, Pituch T, Maaieh H, Short C, Strecher V. Predicting which type of push notification content motivates users to engage in a self-monitoring app. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Sep;11:267–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.07.004. S2211-3355(18)30117-7
    1. Morrison D, Mair FS, Yardley L, Kirby S, Thomas M. Living with asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: using technology to support self-management - An overview. Chron Respir Dis. 2017 Nov;14(4):407–19. doi: 10.1177/1479972316660977. 1479972316660977
    1. Freyne J, Yin J, Brindal E, Hendrie G, Berkovsky S, Noakes M. Push notifications in diet apps: influencing engagement times and tasks. Int J Human Comput Interact. 2017 Feb 06;33(10):833–45. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2017.1289725. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2017.1289725.
    1. Ptakauskaite N, Cox AL, Berthouse N. Knowing what you're doing or knowing what to do: how stress management apps support reflection and behaviour change. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; CHI '18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Apr 21 - 26, 2018; Montreal, QC, Canada. 2018.
    1. Li I, Dey AK, Forlizzi J. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing; Ubicomp '11: The 2011 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing; Sep 17 - 21, 2011; Beijing, China. 2011.
    1. Sherdell L, Waugh CE, Gotlib IH. Anticipatory pleasure predicts motivation for reward in major depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):51–60. doi: 10.1037/a0024945. 2011-17872-001
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. S1532-0464(08)00122-6
    1. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026.S0165-0327(08)00282-6
    1. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.
    1. Matcham F, Barattieri di San Pietro C, Bulgari V, de Girolamo G, Dobson R, Eriksson H, Folarin AA, Haro JM, Kerz M, Lamers F, Li Q, Manyakov NV, Mohr DC, Myin-Germeys I, Narayan V, Bwjh P, Ranjan Y, Rashid Z, Rintala A, Siddi S, Simblett SK, Wykes T, Hotopf M, RADAR-CNS consortium, et al Remote assessment of disease and relapse in major depressive disorder (RADAR-MDD): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z. 10.1186/s12888-019-2049-z
    1. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. United Kingdom: Silverback; 2014.
    1. Polhemus AM, Novák J, Ferrao J, Simblett S, Radaelli M, Locatelli P, Matcham F, Kerz M, Weyer J, Burke P, Huang V, Dockendorf MF, Temesi G, Wykes T, Comi G, Myin-Germeys I, Folarin A, Dobson R, Manyakov NV, Narayan VA, Hotopf M. Human-centered design strategies for device selection in mHealth programs: development of a novel framework and case study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 07;8(5):e16043. doi: 10.2196/16043. v8i5e16043
    1. Bot M, Middeldorp CM, de Geus EJ, Lau HM, Sinke M, van Nieuwenhuizen B, Smit JH, Boomsma DI, Penninx BW. Validity of LIDAS (LIfetime Depression Assessment Self-report): a self-report online assessment of lifetime major depressive disorder. Psychol Med. 2017 Jan;47(2):279–89. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002312.S0033291716002312
    1. Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR, Jarrett RB, Trivedi MH. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):477–86. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035558.
    1. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun B, Wittchen H. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview short-form (CIDI-SF) Int J Method Psychiat Res. 2006 Nov;7(4):171–85. doi: 10.1002/mpr.47.
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.166/10/1092
    1. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JM. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:461–4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461.S0007125000160878
    1. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.S0022-3999(05)00491-5
    1. Brugha T, Bebbington P, Tennant C, Hurry J. The List of Threatening Experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychol Med. 1985 Feb;15(1):189–94. doi: 10.1017/s003329170002105x.
    1. Beecham J, Martin K. Measuring Mental Health Needs. London: Gaskell/Royal College of Psychiatrists; 1992. Costing psychiatric interventions.
    1. Holdener M, Gut A, Angerer A. Applicability of the user engagement scale to mobile health: a survey-based quantitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 03;8(1):e13244. doi: 10.2196/13244. v8i1e13244
    1. Killian KD. Development and validation of the Emotional Self-Awareness Questionnaire: a measure of emotional intelligence. J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jul;38(3):502–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00233.x.
    1. Zhou L, Bao J, Setiawan IM, Saptono A, Parmanto B. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): development and validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e11500. doi: 10.2196/11500. v7i4e11500
    1. O'Brien HL, Toms EG. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2009 Oct 19;61(1):50–69. doi: 10.1002/asi.21229.
    1. O’Brien HL, Cairns P, Hall M. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. Int J Human Comput Stud. 2018 Apr;112:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004.
    1. Probst P, Grummich K, Heger P, Zaschke S, Knebel P, Ulrich A, Büchler MW, Diener MK. Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study. Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 24;5:48. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0226-4. 10.1186/s13643-016-0226-4
    1. Unlock insights in your data with powerful analysis. NVivo. [2021-12-05]. .
    1. Rennie D. CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):2006–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.2006.jed10017
    1. Behar JA, Liu C, Kotzen K, Tsutsui K, Corino VD, Singh J, Pimentel MA, Warrick P, Zaunseder S, Andreotti F, Sebag D, Kopanitsa G, McSharry PE, Karlen W, Karmakar C, Clifford GD. Remote health diagnosis and monitoring in the time of COVID-19. Physiol Meas. 2020 Nov 10;41(10):10TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/abba0a.
    1. Najam S. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):e34. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30238-8.
    1. Owens AP, Ballard C, Beigi M, Kalafatis C, Brooker H, Lavelle G, Brønnick KK, Sauer J, Boddington S, Velayudhan L, Aarsland D. Implementing remote memory clinics to enhance clinical care during and after COVID-19. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:579934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579934.
    1. Torous J, Lipschitz J, Ng M, Firth J. Dropout rates in clinical trials of smartphone apps for depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:413–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.167.S0165-0327(19)32606-0
    1. Zhang Y, Folarin AA, Sun S, Cummins N, Ranjan Y, Rashid Z, Conde P, Stewart C, Laiou P, Matcham F, Oetzmann C, Lamers F, Siddi S, Simblett S, Rintala A, Mohr DC, Myin-Germeys I, Wykes T, Haro JM, Penninx BW, Narayan VA, Annas P, Hotopf M, Dobson RJ. Predicting depressive symptom severity through individuals' nearby bluetooth device count data collected by mobile phones: preliminary longitudinal study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 30;9(7):e29840. doi: 10.2196/29840. v9i7e29840
    1. Remote smartphone-based speech collection: acceptance and barriers in individuals with major depressive disorder. . 2021. [2021-12-05]. .
    1. Szinay D, Jones A, Chadborn T, Brown J, Naughton F. Influences on the uptake of and engagement with health and well-being smartphone apps: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17572. doi: 10.2196/17572. v22i5e17572

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren