Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: A Pilot Study on Deep Learning for Hypoglycemic Events Detection based on ECG

Mihaela Porumb, Saverio Stranges, Antonio Pescapè, Leandro Pecchia, Mihaela Porumb, Saverio Stranges, Antonio Pescapè, Leandro Pecchia

Abstract

Tracking the fluctuations in blood glucose levels is important for healthy subjects and crucial diabetic patients. Tight glucose monitoring reduces the risk of hypoglycemia, which can result in a series of complications, especially in diabetic patients, such as confusion, irritability, seizure and can even be fatal in specific conditions. Hypoglycemia affects the electrophysiology of the heart. However, due to strong inter-subject heterogeneity, previous studies based on a cohort of subjects failed to deploy electrocardiogram (ECG)-based hypoglycemic detection systems reliably. The current study used personalised medicine approach and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to automatically detect nocturnal hypoglycemia using a few heartbeats of raw ECG signal recorded with non-invasive, wearable devices, in healthy individuals, monitored 24 hours for 14 consecutive days. Additionally, we present a visualisation method enabling clinicians to visualise which part of the ECG signal (e.g., T-wave, ST-interval) is significantly associated with the hypoglycemic event in each subject, overcoming the intelligibility problem of deep-learning methods. These results advance the feasibility of a real-time, non-invasive hypoglycemia alarming system using short excerpts of ECG signal.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed CNN based system illustrating the study objectives. To detect the low glucose levels using the ECG signal, we set three objectives: (OBJ 1) was to build a classifier (using a CNN network) for the low glucose levels detection task. Secondly, the chosen method for performing the classification (i.e., CNN) enables to investigate further the learned representation of the input heartbeats (OBJ 2), representation (embedding) that can be used in for data visualisation/clustering in lower-dimensional space. The method used for the nonlinear dimension reduction is t-SNE. The third objective (OBJ 3) was to investigate the important regions in the input time series (the heartbeat signal) that contribute the most to the final classification result (Grad-CAM method).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proposed CNN + RNN system for low blood glucose detection in a 5-minute window of time. The individual heartbeats were firstly isolated, then grouped into 5-minute segments. Each considered 5-minutes segment was chosen if it contained at least 200 heartbeats. This condition also implies that the glucose event (low/normal) should last for at least 5 minutes, thus each 5-minute ECG segment was associated with a single label: low/normal glucose. Each heartbeat was firstly transformed into a feature representation using a CNN network, representation that was fed as input to the sequence model (RNN cells). The outputs of the final RNN are the inputs to a linear layer with a softmax producing a distribution P over the two possible outputs: normal or low glucose values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hypoglycemia detection during the night using the heartbeat majority voting in the 10-minute window of time. The black waveform represents the glucose values recorded by the CGM, considered as ground truth glucose level in this study. The grey shaded regions illustrate a ± 10% error boundary for the CGM glucose readings, as it has been reported in previous studies. The colour of the points indicates the predicted class: red for the predicted low-glucose levels and green for the predicted normal-glucose levels. Moreover, dark colours indicate more certain predictions: dark red points accounted for low-glucose predictions with the predicted probability > 0.7, while light red accounted for low-glucose prediction with predicted probability ≤ 0.7; dark green accounted for normal-glucose prediction with predicted probability > 0.7 and light green accounted for normal-glucose prediction with a probability ≤ 0.7. Images a and b present the glucose levels predictions for a sample training day, while columns c and d present the glucose predictions for the same sample test day. The missing heartbeats are due to one of the following reasons: participant removing the sensor, artifact due to movement; missing glucose data, ECG pre-processing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Identification of the most relevant heartbeat segments for hypoglycemia detection using Grad-CAM method. The solid lines represent the mean of all the heartbeats that correspond to each subject in the training dataset: green during normal glucose levels, red during hypoglycemic events. The comparison among 4 different subjects highlighted the fact that each subject may have a different ECG waveform during hypoglycemic events for instance Subjects 1 and 2 present a visibly longer QT interval during hypoglycemic events, differently from subjects 3 and 4. The error bands represent the standard deviation of the considered heartbeats. The vertical bars represent the histograms of the sample points that were >0.9 in the normalised heatmaps obtained from applying Grad-CAM methods on all the training heartbeats.
Figure 5
Figure 5
t-SNE visualisation of the test heartbeats corresponding to subject 3 in the activation space representation. The red heartbeats correspond to a low glucose level (

References

    1. Schork NJ. Randomized clinical trials and personalized medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982. 2018;210:71–73.
    1. Deaton, A. & Cartwright, N. Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Trials. , 10.3386/w22595 (2016).
    1. Peck RW. Precision Medicine Is Not Just Genomics: The Right Dose for Every Patient. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018;58:105–122. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052446.
    1. Schork NJ. Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials. Nat. News. 2015;520:609. doi: 10.1038/520609a.
    1. Seyhan, A. A. & Carini, C. Are innovation and new technologies in precision medicine paving a new era in patients centric care? J. Transl. Med., 17, (2019).
    1. Clough AJ, Hilmer SN, Naismith SL, Kardell LD, Gnjidic D. N-of-1 trials for assessing the effects of deprescribing medications on short-term clinical outcomes in older adults: a systematic review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2018;93:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.015.
    1. Dugger SA, Platt A, Goldstein DB. Drug development in the era of precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:183–196. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.226.
    1. Yetisen Ali K., Martinez-Hurtado Juan Leonardo, Ünal Barış, Khademhosseini Ali, Butt Haider. Wearables in Medicine. Advanced Materials. 2018;30(33):1706910. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706910.
    1. Polisena J, et al. Health technology assessment methods guidelines for medical devices: how can we address the gaps? The international federation of medical and biological engineering perspective. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 2018;34:276–289. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000314.
    1. Montesinos L, Castaldo R, Pecchia L. Wearable Inertial Sensors for Fall Risk Assessment and Prediction in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2018;26:573–582. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2771383.
    1. Fröhlich H, et al. From hype to reality: data science enabling personalized medicine. BMC Med. 2018;16:150. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1122-7.
    1. Hulsen, T. et al. From Big Data to Precision Medicine. Front. Med., 6, (2019).
    1. Mesko B. The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine. Expert Rev. Precis. Med. Drug Dev. 2017;2:239–241. doi: 10.1080/23808993.2017.1380516.
    1. Aronson D. Hyperglycemia and the pathobiology of diabetic complications. Adv. Cardiol. 2008;45:1–16. doi: 10.1159/000115118.
    1. Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. The DCCT Research Group. Am. J. Med., 90, 450–459 (1991).
    1. Wagner J, Malchoff C, Abbott G. Invasiveness as a barrier to self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2005;7:612–619. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.612.
    1. Damiano ER, et al. A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: the Navigator, G4 Platinum, and Enlite. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014;8:699–708. doi: 10.1177/1932296814532203.
    1. Fokkert MJ, et al. Performance of the FreeStyle Libre Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care. 2017;5:e000320. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000320.
    1. Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, Klaff LJ, Alva S. The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015;17:787–794. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0378.
    1. Al Hayek AA, Robert AA, Al Dawish MA. Evaluation of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Glycemic Control, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Fear of Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Clin. Med. Insights Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2017;10:1–6.
    1. Premarket Approval (PMA). (2017).
    1. Beck RW, et al. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317:371. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
    1. Ajjan RA, et al. Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring technologies: Implications for clinical practice. Diab. Vasc. Dis. Res. 2018;15:175–184. doi: 10.1177/1479164118756240.
    1. Kropff J, et al. Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2015;17:343–349. doi: 10.1111/dom.12378.
    1. Bonora B, Maran A, Ciciliot S, Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2016;39:1391–1399. doi: 10.1007/s40618-016-0495-8.
    1. Freckmann G, et al. Measurement Performance of Two Continuous Tissue Glucose Monitoring Systems. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2018;20:541–549. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0105.
    1. Ekhlaspour L, et al. Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016;11:558–566. doi: 10.1177/1932296816672237.
    1. Pandey R, et al. Noninvasive Monitoring of Blood Glucose with Raman Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50:264–272. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00472.
    1. Gamsey S, Suri JT, Wessling RA, Singaram B. Continuous Glucose Detection Using Boronic Acid-Substituted Viologens in Fluorescent Hydrogels: Linker Effects and Extension to Fiber Optics. Langmuir. 2006;22:9067–9074. doi: 10.1021/la0617053.
    1. Larin KV, Eledrisi MS, Motamedi M, Esenaliev RO. Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring with optical coherence tomography: a pilot study in human subjects. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2263–2267. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2263.
    1. Chen, C. et al. Current and Emerging Technology for Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Sensors, 17, (2017).
    1. So C-F, Choi K-S, Wong TK, Chung JW. Recent advances in noninvasive glucose monitoring. Med. Devices Auckl. NZ. 2012;5:45–52.
    1. Tura A, Maran A, Pacini G. Non-invasive glucose monitoring: Assessment of technologies and devices according to quantitative criteria. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2007;77:16–40. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.10.027.
    1. Cichosz SL, Frystyk J, Hejlesen OK, Tarnow L, Fleischer J. A Novel Algorithm for Prediction and Detection of Hypoglycemia Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014;8:731–737. doi: 10.1177/1932296814528838.
    1. Sudharsan B, Peeples M, Shomali M. Hypoglycemia Prediction Using Machine Learning Models for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2015;9:86–90. doi: 10.1177/1932296814554260.
    1. Pappada SM, et al. Neural Network-Based Real-Time Prediction of Glucose in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011;13:135–141. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0104.
    1. Zanderigo F, Sparacino G, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C. Glucose Prediction Algorithms from Continuous Monitoring Data: Assessment of Accuracy via Continuous Glucose Error-Grid Analysis. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2007;1:645–651. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100508.
    1. Pappada SM, Cameron BD, Rosman PM. Development of a Neural Network for Prediction of Glucose Concentration in Type 1 Diabetes Patients. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2008;2:792–801. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200507.
    1. Sobel SI, Chomentowski PJ, Vyas N, Andre D, Toledo FGS. Accuracy of a Novel Noninvasive Multisensor Technology to Estimate Glucose in Diabetic Subjects During Dynamic Conditions. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014;8:54–63. doi: 10.1177/1932296813516182.
    1. Rollins DK, et al. Free-living inferential modeling of blood glucose level using only noninvasive inputs. J. Process Control. 2010;20:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.09.008.
    1. Ling SH, San PP, Nguyen HT. Non-invasive hypoglycemia monitoring system using extreme learning machine for Type 1 diabetes. ISA Trans. 2016;64:440–446. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2016.05.008.
    1. Nguyen, L. L., Su, S. & Nguyen, H. T. Identification of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia in Type 1 Diabetic patients using ECG parameters. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2716–2719 (2012).
    1. Lipponen, J. A. et al. Hypoglycemia detection based on cardiac repolarization features. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 4697–4700 (2011).
    1. Ling SSH, Nguyen HT. Genetic-Algorithm-Based Multiple Regression With Fuzzy Inference System for Detection of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2011;15:308–315. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2103953.
    1. Laitinen T, et al. Electrocardiographic alterations during hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in healthy subjects. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Holter Noninvasive Electrocardiol. Inc. 2008;13:97–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2008.00208.x.
    1. Koivikko ML, et al. Effects of controlled hypoglycaemia on cardiac repolarisation in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008;51:426–435. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0902-y.
    1. Robinson RTCE, et al. Mechanisms of Abnormal Cardiac Repolarization During Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia. Diabetes. 2003;52:1469–1474. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.6.1469.
    1. Lipponen JA, et al. Dynamic estimation of cardiac repolarization characteristics during hypoglycemia in healthy and diabetic subjects. Physiol. Meas. 2011;32:649–660. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/6/003.
    1. Robinson RTCE, Harris ND, Ireland RH, Lindholm A, Heller SR. Comparative effect of human soluble insulin and insulin aspart upon hypoglycaemia-induced alterations in cardiac repolarization. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2003;55:246–251. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01726.x.
    1. Meinhold J, Heise T, Rave K, Heinemann L. Electrocardiographic Changes During Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia in Healthy Subjects. Horm. Metab. Res. 1998;30:694–697. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978960.
    1. Wang K. Atlas of Electrocardiography. 2013.
    1. Lipponen JA, Tarvainen MP, Laitinen T, Lyyra-Laitinen T, Karjalainen PA. A Principal Component Regression Approach for Estimation of Ventricular Repolarization Characteristics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010;57:1062–1069. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2037492.
    1. Ling SH, Nguyen HT. Natural occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia detection using hybrid particle swarm optimized fuzzy reasoning model. Artif. Intell. Med. 2012;55:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.04.003.
    1. Ling, S. H., San, P. P., Lam, H. K. & Nguyen, H. T. Non-invasive detection of hypoglycemic episodes in Type 1 diabetes using intelligent hybrid rough neural system. in 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 1238–1242 (2014).
    1. Ireland RH, Robinson RT, Heller SR, Marques JL, Harris ND. Measurement of high resolution ECG QT interval during controlled euglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Physiol. Meas. 2000;21:295–303. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/21/2/309.
    1. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 1979;237:E214–223.
    1. Gertsch Marc. The ECG. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2004. The Normal ECG and its (Normal) Variants; pp. 19–43.
    1. Mahendrappa S, Sathyanarayana T. The normal variations in heart rate and QRS complex of healthy individuals in different age groups. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014;2:861. doi: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20140821.
    1. Zheng Y, Liu Q, Chen E, Ge Y, Zhao JL. Exploiting multi-channels deep convolutional neural networks for multivariate time series classification. Front. Comput. Sci. 2016;10:96–112. doi: 10.1007/s11704-015-4478-2.
    1. Cui, Z., Chen, W. & Chen, Y. Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Time Series Classification. ArXiv160306995 Cs (2016).
    1. Wang, Z., Yan, W. & Oates, T. Time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks: A strong baseline. In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 1578–1585 (2017).
    1. Bagnall, A., Lines, J., Bostrom, A., Large, J. & Keogh, E. The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 1–55 (2016).
    1. Zihlmann, M., Perekrestenko, D. & Tschannen, M. Convolutional recurrent neural networks for electrocardiogram classification. In 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC) 1–4 (2017).
    1. Kiranyaz S, Ince T, Gabbouj M. Real-Time Patient-Specific ECG Classification by 1-D Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016;63:664–675. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2468589.
    1. Pourbabaee B, Roshtkhari MJ, Khorasani K. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Learning ECG Features for Screening Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2017;PP:1–10.
    1. Hannun AY, et al. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat. Med. 2019;25:65. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0268-3.
    1. Attia ZI, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram. Nat. Med. 2019;25:70. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2.
    1. Mincholé A, Rodriguez B. Artificial intelligence for the electrocardiogram. In Nature Medicine. 2018;25:22. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0306-1.
    1. Selvaraju, R. R. et al. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 618–626 (2017).
    1. Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P. Representation Learning: A Review and New. Perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013;35:1798–1828. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50.
    1. Maaten, L. van der & Hinton, G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
    1. Christensen TF, et al. QT interval prolongation during spontaneous episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: the impact of heart rate correction. Diabetologia. 2010;53:2036–2041. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1802-0.
    1. Robinson RTCE, Harris ND, Ireland RH, Macdonald IA, Heller SR. Changes in cardiac repolarization during clinical episodes of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47:312–315. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1292-4.
    1. Chow E, et al. Risk of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk. Diabetes. 2014;63:1738–1747. doi: 10.2337/db13-0468.
    1. Ling SH, Nuryani N, Nguyen HT. Evolved fuzzy reasoning model for hypoglycaemic detection. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2010;2010:4662–4665.
    1. Ling SH, San PP, Lam HK, Nguyen HT. Hypoglycemia detection: multiple regression-based combinational neural logic approach. Soft Comput. 2017;21:543–553. doi: 10.1007/s00500-015-1809-z.
    1. San PP, Ling SH, Nguyen HT. Deep learning framework for detection of hypoglycemic episodes in children with type 1 diabetes. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2016;2016:3503–3506.
    1. Marques JL, et al. Altered ventricular repolarization during hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes. Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 1997;14:648–654. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199708)14:8<648::AID-DIA418>;2-1.
    1. Porumb, M., Iadanza, E., Massaro, S. & Pecchia, L. A convolutional neural network approach to detect congestive heart failure. Biomed. Signal. Process. Control55, 101597 (2020).
    1. ZephyrTM Performance Systems | Performance Monitoring Technology. .
    1. An Assessment of the Zephyr BioPatch and Its Ability to Monitor Patient Position | Smart Patients. .
    1. Performance Assessment of a Remote Patient Monitoring Device - ICH GCP - Clinical Trials Registry. .
    1. Blum A. Freestyle Libre Glucose Monitoring System. Clin. Diabetes Publ. Am. Diabetes Assoc. 2018;36:203–204. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0130.
    1. Zhang E, Cao Z. Coated glucose sensors dodge recalibration. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2018;2:881. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0329-4.
    1. Aberer F, et al. Evaluation of subcutaneous glucose monitoring systems under routine environmental conditions in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017;19:1051–1055. doi: 10.1111/dom.12907.
    1. Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kröger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2016;388:2254–2263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5.
    1. Batchvarov, V. Circadian Pattern of T Wave Morphology. In Dynamic Electrocardiography (eds. Malik, M. & Camm, A. J.) 358–370 (Blackwell Publishing, 2004), 10.1002/9780470987483.ch36.
    1. Koch HJ, Raschka C, Banzer W. Diurnal variation of ECG intervals and R or T amplitudes in healthy male subjects assessed by means of spectral and cosinor analysis. Jpn. Heart J. 1999;40:45–53. doi: 10.1536/jhj.40.45.
    1. Nakagawa M, et al. Circadian rhythm of the signal averaged electrocardiogram and its relation to heart rate variability in healthy subjects. Heart. 1998;79:493–496. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.5.493.
    1. American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:S11–S24. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S005.
    1. Yazdani S, Fallet S, Vesin J. A Novel Short-Term Event Extraction Algorithm for Biomedical Signals. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2018;65:754–762. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2718179.
    1. Abadi, M. et al. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. (2015).
    1. Glorot, X. & Bengio, Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 249–256 (2010).
    1. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (2015).
    1. Nair, V. & Hinton, G. E. Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning 807–814 (Omnipress, 2010).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren