Evaluation of gender differences in postoperative sore throat and hoarseness following the use of Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask: the randomised controlled LadyLAMA trial study protocol

Katharina Epp, Uli Przybylski, Carla Luz, Marc Kriege, Eva Wittenmeier, Irene Schmidtmann, Nina Pirlich, Katharina Epp, Uli Przybylski, Carla Luz, Marc Kriege, Eva Wittenmeier, Irene Schmidtmann, Nina Pirlich

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a comparatively minor but very common side effect of general anaesthesia with a supraglottic airway device. The patient considers these side effects a mirror of the quality of anaesthesia. The aims of this study are to evaluate gender-specific differences in the incidence of POST and to assess whether the effects of known risk factors vary between genders.

Methods and analysis: The LadyLAMA trial is a single-centre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients requiring ophthalmological surgery under general anaesthesia with a second generation Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask are randomly allocated to either cuff pressure of 45 cmH2O or cuff pressure of 60 cmH2O. We estimate the difference in POST between the genders at 20% and we hypothesised that a reduction of cuff pressure would reduce POST by 10%. A total of 800 patients will be recruited, with each subgroup including 200 patients to achieve 80% power for detecting a difference at the 5% significance level. Primary endpoints are gender differences in the incidence of POST within 24 hours postoperatively, as well as comparison of cuff pressure 45 cmH2O to 60 cmH2O with respect to POST. The main secondary objective is the effect of cuff pressure on POST stratified by gender. Further secondary endpoints are gender-specific differences in POST and hoarseness in postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) at 48 and 72 hours (or until freedom of discomfort). The parameter cuff pressure serves as key-secondary endpoint.

Ethics and dissemination: The project is approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of the Rhineland Palatine state (Nr. 2021-15835). The results of this study will be made available in the form of manuscripts for publication and presentations at national and international meetings.

Trial registration number: NCT04915534.

Keywords: adult anaesthesia; anatomy; pain management.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart of recruitment and intervention schedule according to CONSORT guidelines. BMI, body mass index; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; LM, laryngeal masks; RSA, rapid sequence induction; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; PACU, postanaesthesia care unit.

References

    1. Jaensson M, Gupta A, Nilsson U. Gender differences in sore throat and hoarseness following endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway: a prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 2014;14:56. 10.1186/1471-2253-14-56
    1. El-Boghdadly K, Bailey CR, Wiles MD. Postoperative sore throat: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2016;71:706–17. 10.1111/anae.13438
    1. L'Hermite J, Dubout E, Bouvet S, et al. . Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017;34:417–24. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000539
    1. Reier CE. Bleeding, dysphagia, dysphonia, dysarthria, severe sore throat, and possible recurrent laryngeal, hypoglossal, and lingual nerve injury associated with routine laryngeal mask airway management: where is the vigilance? Anesthesiology 2004;101:1241–2. 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00034
    1. Higgins PP, Chung F, Mezei G. Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:582–4. 10.1093/bja/88.4.582
    1. van Esch BF, Stegeman I, Smit AL. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: a systematic review on airway complications. J Clin Anesth 2017;36:142–50. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.004
    1. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask--a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983;55:801–5. 10.1093/bja/55.8.801
    1. Piepho T, Cavus E, Noppens R, et al. . S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Anaesthesist 2015;64 Suppl 1:27–40. 10.1007/s00101-015-0109-4
    1. Timmermann A, Byhahn C, Dörges V. S1 Leitlinie prähospitales Atemwegsmanagement. Sonderbeiträge 2019. 10.19224/ai2019.316
    1. Park H-P. Supraglottic airway devices: more good than bad. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019;72:525–6. 10.4097/kja.19417
    1. Schünke MS, E; Schumacher U, Hals P-. Kopf und Neuroanatomie. vol 5. Auflage, 2018.
    1. Daniel MM, Lorenzi MC, da Costa Leite C, et al. . Pharyngeal dimensions in healthy men and women. Clinics 2007;62:5–10. 10.1590/S1807-59322007000100002
    1. Brooks LJ, Strohl KP. Size and mechanical properties of the pharynx in healthy men and women. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:1394–7. 10.1164/ajrccm/146.6.1394
    1. Schwab J. Sex differences and sleep apnoea. Thorax 1999;54:284–5. 10.1136/thx.54.4.284
    1. Maruyama K, Sakai H, Miyazawa H, et al. . Sore throat and hoarseness after total intravenous anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:541–3. 10.1093/bja/aeh098
    1. Mencke T, Zitzmann A, Machmueller S, et al. . Anesthesia with propofol versus sevoflurane: does the longer neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia reduce laryngeal injuries? Anesthesiol Res Pract 2013;2013:1–6. 10.1155/2013/723168
    1. Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S, et al. . Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1049–56. 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00005
    1. Middleton P. Insertion techniques of the laryngeal mask airway: a literature review. J Perioper Pract 2009;19:31–5. 10.1177/175045890901900104
    1. Krishna HM, Kamath S, Shenoy L. Insertion of LMA Classic™ with and without digital intraoral manipulation in anesthetized unparalyzed patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012;28:481–5. 10.4103/0970-9185.101923
    1. Subedi A, Tripathi M, Pokharel K, et al. . Effect of intravenous lidocaine, dexamethasone, and their combination on postoperative sore throat: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2019;129:220–5. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003842
    1. Zhao X, Cao X, Li Q. Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative sore throat: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2015;27:45–50. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.06.014
    1. Nott MR, Noble PD, Parmar M. Reducing the incidence of sore throat with the laryngeal mask airway. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998;15:153–7. 10.1111/j.0265-0215.1998.00257.x
    1. Li B-B, Yan J, Zhou H-G, et al. . Application of minimum effective cuff inflating volume for laryngeal mask airway and its impact on postoperative pharyngeal complications. Chin Med J 2015;128:2570–6. 10.4103/0366-6999.166034
    1. Ali A, Altun D, Sivrikoz N, et al. . Comparison of different cuff pressure use with the Supreme laryngeal mask airway on haemodynamic response, seal pressure and postoperative adverse events: a prospective randomized study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2018;46:151–7. 10.5152/TJAR.2017.89587
    1. Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, et al. . Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2010;112:652–7. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf4346
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren