The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?

Dwayne T Brandon, Lydia A Isaac, Thomas A LaVeist, Dwayne T Brandon, Lydia A Isaac, Thomas A LaVeist

Abstract

Objectives: To examine race differences in knowledge of the Tuskegee study and the relationship between knowledge of the Tuskegee study and medical system mistrust.

Methods: We conducted a telephone survey of 277 African-American and 101 white adults 18-93 years of age in Baltimore, MD. Participants responded to questions regarding mistrust of medical care, including a series of questions regarding the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male (Tuskegee study).

Results: Findings show no differences by race in knowledge of or about the Tuskegee study and that knowledge of the study was not a predictor of trust of medical care. However, we find significant race differences in medical care mistrust.

Conclusions: Our results cast doubt on the proposition that the widely documented race difference in mistrust of medical care results from the Tuskegee study. Rather, race differences in mistrust likely stem from broader historical and personal experiences.

References

    1. Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):81-4
    1. Cancer. 2001 Jan 1;91(1 Suppl):233-6
    1. Mt Sinai J Med. 1999 Sep;66(4):236-40
    1. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 25;162(21):2458-63
    1. Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):358-65
    1. Hosp Top. 2003 Spring;81(2):33-8
    1. Am J Med Sci. 2001 Nov;322(5):248-50
    1. Am J Public Health. 1997 Nov;87(11):1773-8
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 6;90(9):644-5
    1. Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):85-95
    1. Postgrad Med. 2004 Dec;116(6):51-3
    1. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Dec;9(10):1061-70
    1. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Mar;52(5):797-808
    1. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Aug;96(8):1051-64

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren