Facial muscle activity, Response Entropy, and State Entropy indices during noxious stimuli in propofol-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide-remifentanil anaesthesia without neuromuscular block
A J Aho, A Yli-Hankala, L-P Lyytikäinen, V Jäntti, A J Aho, A Yli-Hankala, L-P Lyytikäinen, V Jäntti
Abstract
Background: Entropy is an anaesthetic EEG monitoring method, calculating two numerical parameters: State Entropy (SE, range 0-91) and Response Entropy (RE, range 0-100). Low Entropy numbers indicate unconsciousness. SE uses the frequency range 0.8-32 Hz, representing predominantly the EEG activity. RE is calculated at 0.8-47 Hz, consisting of both EEG and facial EMG. RE-SE difference (RE-SE) can indicate EMG, reflecting nociception. We studied RE-SE and EMG in patients anaesthetized without neuromuscular blockers.
Methods: Thirty-one women were studied in propofol-nitrous oxide (P) or propofol-nitrous oxide-remifentanil (PR) anaesthesia. Target SE value was 40-60. RE-SE was measured before and after endotracheal intubation, and before and after the commencement of surgery. The spectral content of the signal was analysed off-line. Appearance of EMG on EEG was verified visually.
Results: RE, SE, and RE-SE increased during intubation in both groups. Elevated RE was followed by increased SE values in most cases. In these patients, spectral analysis of the signal revealed increased activity starting from low (<20 Hz) frequency area up to the highest measured frequencies. This was associated with appearance of EMG in raw signal. No spectral alterations or EMG were seen in patients with stable Entropy values.
Conclusions: Increased RE is followed by increased SE at nociceptive stimuli in patients not receiving neuromuscular blockers. Owing to their overlapping power spectra, the contribution of EMG and EEG cannot be accurately separated with frequency analysis in the range of 10-40 Hz.
Figures
References
- Johansen JW, Sebel PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1336–44.
- Vivien B, Di Maria S, Ouattara A, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B. Overestimation of Bispectral Index in sedated intensive care unit patients revealed by administration of muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:9–17.
- Paloheimo M, Edmonds HL, Jr, Wirtavuori K, Tammisto T. Assessment of anaesthetic adequacy with upper facial and abdominal wall EMG. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1989;6:111–9.
- Jäntti V, Sloan T. EEG and anesthetic effects. Intraoperative monitoring of neural function. In: Nuwer MR, editor. Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV; 2008. pp. 77–93.
- Viertiö-Oja H, Maja V, Särkelä M, et al. Description of the Entropy™ algorithm as applied in the Datex-Ohmeda S/5™ Entropy module. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:154–61.
- Vakkuri A, Yli-Hankala A, Talja P, et al. Time–frequency balanced spectral entropy as a measure of anesthetic drug effect in central nervous system during sevoflurane, propofol, and thiopental anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:145–53.
- Paloheimo MPJ, Wilson RC, Edmonds HL, Jr, Lucas LF, Triantafillou AN. Comparison of neuromuscular blockade in upper facial and hypothenar muscles. J Clin Monit. 1988;4:256–60.
- Wheeler P, Hoffman WE, Baughman VL, Koenig H. Response entropy increases during painful stimulation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17:86–90.
- Valjus M, Ahonen J, Jokela R, Korttila K. Response Entropy™ is not more sensitive than State Entropy™ in distinguishing the use of esmolol instead of remifentanil in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:32–9.
- Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:24–33.
- Brown SL, Schwartz GE. Relationships between facial electromyography and subjective experience during affective imaginery. Biol Psychol. 1980;11:49–62.
- Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K. Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp sub 50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:213–27.
- Katoh T, Ikeda K. The minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in humans. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:301–3.
- Kimura T, Watanebe S, Asakura N, Inomata S, Okada M, Taguchi M. Determination of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in adults. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:378–81.
- Wilson-Pauwels L, Akesson EJ, Stewart PA. Cranial Nerves, Anatomy and Clinical Comments. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc.; 1988.
- van Boxtel A. Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity on facial, jaw, oral and neck muscles. Psychophysiology. 2001;38:22–34.
- Komatsu R, Turan AM, Orhan-Sungur M, McGuire J, Radke OC, Apfel CC. Remifentanil for general anaesthesia: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:1266–80.
Source: PubMed